Cover not available
Part of
Narrative Absorption
Edited by Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Ed S. Tan, Katalin Bálint and Miruna M. Doicaru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 27] 2017
► pp. 199–215

Chapter 10
Elaboration, emotion, and transportation

Implications for conceptual analysis and textual features

| University of Alberta
| University of Alberta
A central component of absorption is the compelling metaphor of “transportation into the story world.” Here, we considered four variables related to transportation and absorption more generally: evoked realism, emotional response, and personal memories as well as transportation. We collected data on these variables from a large crowd-sourced survey of readers’ reactions to their most recently read novel. To provide insight into the causal relations among these variables, we identified the best-fitting structural equation model for these data. The model indicated that transportation was a function of emotional responses, and emotional responses were a function of both evoked realism and personal memories. This analysis was interpreted in terms of the cognitive process of story world elaboration.
Keywords: emotion, elaboration, transportation, structural equation modeling, memory, crowd-sourced survey
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Components of absorption
    • 2.1Transportation
    • 2.2Evoked realism
    • 2.3Emotional responses
    • 2.4Personal memories
  • 3.Evidence on functional relations
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Materials
    • 4.2Respondents
    • 4.3Analysis
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1The role of elaboration
    • 6.2Textual features for absorption
    • 6.3Concluding remarks
  • References
Published online: 9 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.11dix
References (32)
References
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (2015). Transport: Challenges to the metaphor. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive literary studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CrowdFlower, Inc. (n.d.). CrowdFlower. [Web page]. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Cupchik, G., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P. (1998). Emotional effects of reading excerpt from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics, 25, 363–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fish, S. (1988). Interpreting the varorium. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (pp. 319–329). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Gavins, J. (2007). Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(2005). The scope of memory-based processing. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3), 225–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graaf, A. de, Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, H. (2009). The role of dimensions of narrative engagement in narrative persuasion. Communications, 34(4), 385–405. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Bowers, C., Olde, B., White, K., & Person, N. K. (1999). Who knows what? Propagation of knowledge among agents in a literary story world. Poetics, 26(3), 143–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 247–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–342). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. (1997). What emotions really are: The problem of psychological categories. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iser, W. (1988). The reading process: A phenomenological approach. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (pp. 212–228). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the novel. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K. (2002). Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 39–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Palencik, J. T. (2008). Emotions and the force of fiction. Philosophy and Literature, 32(2), 258–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing [Web page]. Retrieved from: <[URL]>
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarry, E. (1995). On vivacity: The difference between daydreaming and imagining-under-authorial instruction. Representations, 52, 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications (Ch.1). Washinton, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, W. (1997). Toward a poetics of emotion. In M. Hjort & S. Laver (Eds.), Emotion and the arts (pp. 215–24). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Walsh, R. (2007). The rhetoric of fictionality: Narrative theory and the idea of fiction. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

de Graaf, Anneke
2023. The role of identification and self-referencing in narrative persuasion. Communications 48:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Ready, Jonathan L.
2023. Immersion, Identification, and the Iliad, DOI logo
Panagiotidou, Maria-Eirini
2022. Transposition: Cognitive Facets of the Ekphrastic Experience. In The Poetics of Ekphrasis, ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.