Cover not available
Part of
Free Indirect Style in Modernism: Representations of consciousness
Eric Rundquist
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 29] 2017
► pp. 183–194

References

Aczel, R. 1998. Hearing voices in narrative texts. New Literary History 29(3): 467–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001a. Understanding as over-hearing: Towards a dialogics of voice. New Literary History 32(2): 597–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001b. Commentary: Throwing voices. New Literary History 32(3): 703–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adamson, S. 1998. Literary language. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. IV, S. Romaine (ed.), 589–692. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1995. Empathetic narrative: A literary linguistic perspective. In Syntax and the Literary System, W. Ayres-Bennet & P. O’Donovan (eds), 17–42. Cambridge: Cambridge French Colloquia.Google Scholar
1994a. From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: Stylization and (de)subjectivization as processes of language change. Transactions of the Philological Society 92(1): 55–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994b. Subjectivity in narration: Empathy and echo. In Subjecthood and Subjectivity, M. Yaguello (ed.), 193–208. Ophrys: Paris.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. 1953[2003]. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aydede, M. 2010. The language of thought hypothesis. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2010 edn, E. Zalta (ed.). <[URL]> (5 August 2012).
Bakhtin, M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, C. Emerson (trans. & ed.). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
1981. Discourse in the novel. In The Dialogic Imagination, C. Emerson & M. Holquist (trans.), M. Holquist (ed.), 259–422. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bal, M. 1985. Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Bally, C. 1912. Free indirect style in Modern French. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 4: 549–606.Google Scholar
1914. Figures of thought and linguistic forms, Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 6: 405–422.Google Scholar
Banfield, A. 2007. Remembrance and tense past. In The Cambridge Companion to the Modernist Novel, M. Shiach (ed.), 48–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. No-narrator theory. In Routledge Encyclopaedia of Narrative Theory, D. Herman, M. Jahn & M. Ryan (eds), 396–397. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1991. L’ecriture et le non-dit. Diacritics 21(4): 21–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1981. Reflective and non-reflective consciousness in the language of fiction. Poetics Today 2(2): 61–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, H. 2002. Helen Baron on disseminated consciousness. In D. H. Lawrence, H. Bloom (ed.), 29–32. Broomall PA: Chelsea House Publishers.Google Scholar
1998. Disseminated consciousness in Sons and Lovers . Essays in Criticism 48(4): 357–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. 1977. The death of the author. In Image, Music, Text, S. Heath (trans.), 142–148. New York NY: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Beeretz, S. 1998. Tell us in Plain Words: Narrative Strategies in James Joyce’s Ulysses. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bell, M. 1992. D.H. Lawrence: Language and Being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benstock, B. & Benstock, S. 1982. The Benstock principle. In The Seventh of Joyce, B. Benstock (ed.) 10–21. Brighton: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics, M. Meek (trans.). Miami FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste 1958. Subjectivity in language. Journal de Psychologie 55: 223–230.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 1891 [2001]. Time and Free Will: Essays on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. Mineola NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Bersani, L. 1980. Against Ulysses . Raritan 8: 201–229.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. 2013. Voice and expressivity in Free Indirect Thought representations: Imitation and representation. Mind and Language 28(5): 579–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Communication and the representation of thought: The use of audience-directed expressions in Free Indirect Thought representations. Journal of Linguistics 46(3): 575–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Parentheticals and point of view in Free Indirect Style. Language and Literature 18: 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bockting, I. 1994. Mind-style as an Interdisciplinary approach to characterisation. Language and Literature 3(3): 157–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowling, L. 1950. What is the stream of consciousness technique? PMLA 50: 333–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, M. 1973. Possibilities: Essays on the State of the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bray, J. 2014. Speech and thought presentation in stylistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, M. Burke (ed.), 222–236. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2007. The dual voice of Free Indirect Discourse: A reading experiment. Language and Literature 16(1): 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. The Epistolary Novel: Representations of Consciousness. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. 1980. Represented perception: A study in narrative style. Poetics 9: 363–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Non-anaphoric reflexives in Free Indirect Style: Expressing the subjectivity of the non-speaker. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, S. Wright & D. Stein (eds), 173–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, L. 2009. The morphing metaphor and the question of narrative voice. Narrative 17(2): 200–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bunyan, J. 1666[2010]. Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners. New York NY: Merchant Books.Google Scholar
Burden, R. 2000. Radicalizing Lawrence: Critical Interventions in the Reading and Reception of D.H. Lawrence’s Narrative Fiction. Amsterdam: Costerus.Google Scholar
Butte, G. 2004. I Know that you Know: Narrating Subjects from Moll Flanders to Marnie. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. 2011. Evolution, science and the study of literature. Language and literature 20(1): 59–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canning, P. & Whitely, S. (eds). 2017. Special issue: Stylistic Approaches to Reader Response Research . Language and Literature 26(2).Google Scholar
Caracciolo, M. 2012. Fictional consciousness: A reader’s manual. Style 46(1): 42–69.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. 2002. The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 657–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. 1982. Style and Interpretation in Hemingway’s “Cat in the Rain.” In Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Stylistics, R. Carter (ed.), 65–80. London: Allen.Google Scholar
Chatman, S. 1978. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1972. Language and the Mind. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace, Javanovich.Google Scholar
Clark, B. 2013. Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohn, D. (trans.). 2005. Early discussions of Free Indirect Style. Poetics Today 26(3): 501–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978. Transparent Minds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, E. & Connors, R. 1999. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cui, Y. 2014. Parentheticals and the presentation of multipersonal consciousness: A stylistic analysis of Mrs Dalloway . Language and Literature 23(2): 175–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culler, J. 1981. The Pursuit of Signs. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Currie, M. 2007. About Time: Narrative, Fiction and the Philosophy of Time. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2013. The Unexpected: Narrative Temporality and the Philosophy of Surprise. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1975. Thought and talk. In Mind and Language, S. Guttenplan (ed.), 7–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1982. Rational animals. In Actions and Events, E. Lepore & B. McLaughlin (eds), 473–480. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Daleski, H. M. 2009. Narratorial border crossings in major early-twentieth-century English novels. Poetics Today 30(2): 237–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York NY: Penguin Putnam.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained. New York NY: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1967. Of Grammatology, G. Spivak (trans.). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1910. How We Think. Lexington MA: D.C. Heath. <[URL]> (24 November 2014). DOI logo
Dillon, G. & Kirchhoff, F. 1976. On the form and function of Free Indirect Style. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature 1: 431–440.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. 1991. Charles Bally and pragmatics. Diacritics 21(4): 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dummett, M. 1981. The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
1989. Language and communication. In Reflections on Chomsky, A. George (ed.). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. 2005. The English Novel: An Introduction. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, S. 1990. Point of View: A Linguistic Analysis of Literary Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellmann, R. 1982. James Joyce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1981. Ideal readers and real readers. In Proceedings of the 32nd Georgetown Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics, D. Tannen (ed.), 248–270. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1976. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fink, B. 2009. A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischman, S. 1990. Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. 2009. An Introduction to Narratology. Abingdon: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
2001. New wine in old bottles? Voice, focalization and new writing. New Literary History 32(3): 619–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. The linguistic illusion of alterity: The free indirect as paradigm of discourse representation. Diacritics 25(4): 89–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1986. Narrative and its development in Ulysses . The Journal of Narrative Technique 16: 15–40.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979. What is an author? In Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, J. Harari (ed.), 141–160. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1966. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. 1996. Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1981. Linguistic criticism. In Literature as Social Discourse, 24–45. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
1977. Linguistics and the Novel. Bungay: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
French, M. 1976. The Book as World: James Joyce’s Ulysses. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedemann, K. 1910[1965]. Die Rolle des Erzählers in der Epik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Friedman, A. 1966. The Turn of the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, M. 1995. Deictic shift theory and the poetics of involvement. In Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, J. Duchan, B. Gail & L. Hewitt (eds), 19–59. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gavins, J. 2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J. & Stockwell, P. 2012. About the heart, where it hurt exactly, and how often. Language and Literature 21(1): 33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. 1988. Narrative Discourse Revisited, J. Lewin (trans.). Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1972[1980]. Narrative Discourse, J. Lewin (trans.) Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Golomb, H. 1968. Combined Speech – A major technique in the prose of S. J. Agnon: Its use in the story “A different face”. Ha-Sifrut 1: 251–62.Google Scholar
Grady, J. 2005. Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, B. Hampe & J. Grady (eds), 35–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, S. 2008. Id: The Quest for Identity in the 21st Century. London: Sceptre.Google Scholar
Gunn, D. 2004. Free Indirect Discourse and narrative authority in Emma . Narrative 12(1): 35–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J. and Koopman, M. 2010. Readers closing in on immoral characters’ consciousness: effects of free indirect discourse on response to literary narratives. Journal of Literary Theory 4(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, G. 2014a. Stylistics as literary criticism. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whitely (eds), 87–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b. Stylistics and literary theory. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, V. Sotirova (ed.), 244–262. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
1971. Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors . In Literary Style, a Symposium, S. Chatman (ed.), 330–368. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. & Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2012. Diegesis-mimesis. In The Living Handbook of Narratology, P. Hühn, J. C. Meister, J. Pier & W. Schmid (eds). Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. <[URL]> (13 April 2013).
Hamburger, K. 1973. The Logic of Literature, M. J. Rose (trans.). Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, C. 2017. Cognitive Grammar in Contemporary Fiction [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 26]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Attentional windowing in David Foster Wallace’s “The soul is not a smithy”. In Harrison et al., 53–68.Google Scholar
Harrison, C., Nuttall, L., Stockwell, P. & Yuan, W. (eds) 2014. Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F. & Van Peer, W. 2016. Empirical stylistics. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, V. Sotirova (ed.), 380–399. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hayman, D. 1970[1982]. Ulysses, The Mechanics of Meaning. Madison WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1959. What is Called Thinking? New York NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Hemingway, E. 1952[1994]. The Old Man and the Sea. New York NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Herman, D. 2011a. Introduction to The Emergence of Mind , D. Herman (ed.), 1–42. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
2011b. 1880–1945: Re-minding modernism. In The Emergence of Mind, D. Herman (ed.), 243–272. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillis Miller, J. 1983. The rhythm of creativity in To the Lighthouse . In Modernism Reconsidered, R. Kiely (ed.), 168–188. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, P. C. 2013. Parallel processing and the human mind: Re-understanding consciousness with James Joyce’s Ulysses . Journal of Literary Semantics 42(2): 149–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, D. 1992. Where D.H. Lawrence Was Wrong About Women. Lewisburg PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Holtby, W. 1932. Virginia Woolf: A Critical Memoir. London: Wishart and Co.Google Scholar
Hoover, D. 2016. Mind-style. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, V. Sotirova (ed.), 325–340. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hough, G. 1970. Narrative and dialogue in Jane Austen. Critical Quarterly 12(3): 201–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, R. 1954. Stream of Consciousness in the Modern Novel. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, V. 1992. The Risen Adam: D.H. Lawrence’s Revisionist Typology. State College PA: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Ikeo, R. 2007. Unambiguous Free Indirect Discourse? Language and Literature 16: 367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. A corpus stylistic study of To the Lighthouse . <[URL]> (12 October 2012).
Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jahn, M. 2005. Narrative situations. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M. Ryan (eds), 364–366. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1992. Contextualising represented speech and thought. Journal of Pragmatics 17: 347–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1971. On realism and art. In Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and structuralist views, L. Matejka & K. Pomorska (eds), 38–46. McLean IL: Dalkey Archive Press.Google Scholar
James, H. 1897[1984]. What Maisie Knew. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
James, W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. New York NY: Henry Holt and Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jameson, F. 1972. The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, A. 1980. The place of Free Indirect Discourse in the poetics of fiction: With examples from Joyce’s “Eveline”. Essays in Poetics 5(1): 36–47.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. 2007. Tradition and revelation: Moments of being in Virginia Woolf’s major novels. In The Cambridge Companion to the Modernist Novel, M. Shiach (ed.), 112–125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. 2005. The philosophical significance of image schemas. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, B. Hampe (ed.), 15–33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, A. 2013. Lacan. In The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, E. Zalta (ed.). <[URL]> (20 September 2014).
Joseph, J. 2004. The linguistic sign. In The Cambridge Companion to Saussure, C. Sanders (ed.), 59–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, J. 1922[2010]. Ulysses. Ware: Wordsworth Editions.Google Scholar
1916[2005]. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. London: Collector’s Library, CRW Publishing.Google Scholar
1966. The Letters of James Joyce, Vol. I, II and III. New York NY: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Kahler, E. 1973. The Inward Turn of Narrative. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kalepky, T. 1913. On “Free Indirect Style” (“veiled discourse”). Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 5: 608–619.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. 1974. Scylla and Charybdis. In James Joyce’s Ulysses: Critical Essays, C. Hart & D. Hayman (ed), 147–180. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. 1988. Narrative Strategies in Joyce’s Ulysses. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Research Press.Google Scholar
Kenner, H. 1978. Joyce’s Voices. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kern, S. 2011. The Modernist Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kershner, R. B. 1989. Joyce, Bakhtin, and Popular Culture: Chronicles of Disorder. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S. Y. 1973. Where epistemology, style, and grammar meet. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds), 337–391. New York NY: Holt Rinehart and Wilson.Google Scholar
1976. Reflections on the foundations of narrative theory. In Pragmatics of Language and Literature, T. A. van Dijk (ed.), 107–140. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. 2008. My Teaching. London: Verso.Google Scholar
1966[2007]. Ecrits. New York NJ: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought, 2nd edn, A. Ortony (ed.), 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanham, R. 1990. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lanser, S. 1992. Fictions of Authority. Women Writers and Narrative Voice. Ithaca CA: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, K. 1981. The Odyssey of Style in Ulysses. Princeton NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. 1915[1995]. The Rainbow. London: Wordsworth.Google Scholar
1922[2009]. Aaron’s Rod. Memphis, TN: General Books, LLC.Google Scholar
Leech, G. & Short, M. 1981[2007]. Style in Fiction, 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Lerch, L. 1914. The stylistic meaning of the imperfect of discourse (Free Indirect Style). GRM 6: 470–489.Google Scholar
Levitt, M. 2006. The Rhetoric of Modernist Fiction: From a New Point of View. Lebanon NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Lodge, D. 2002. Consciousness and the Novel. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
1990. After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1977. The Modes of Modern Writing. Birkenhead: Willmer Brothers.Google Scholar
Lorck, E. 1921. Die ‘Erlebte Rede’. Eine sprachliche Untersuchung, Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Lubbock, P. 1921. The Craft of Fiction. New York NJ: Jonathan Cape and Harrison Smith.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1994. Subjecthood and subjectivity. In Subjecthood and Subjectivity, M. Yaguello (ed.), 9–17. Ophrys: Paris.Google Scholar
1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, T. 1912[1960]. Der Tod in Venedig, Gesammelte Werke, Vol. VIII. Frankfurt: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
Mansfield, K. 1922[2007]. The Garden Party. In The Garden Party and Other Stories, 59–82. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Margolin, U. 2011. Narrator. In The Living handbook of Narratology, P. Hühn, J. C. Meister, J. Pier & W. Schmid (eds). Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. <[URL]> (13 April 2012).
Marnette, S. 2005. Speech and Thought Presentation in French: Concepts and Strategies [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 133]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. The French theorie de l’enonciation and the study of speech and thought presentation. Language and Literature 10(3): 243–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McHale, B. 2005a. Free Indirect Discourse. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, D. Herman, M. Jahn & M. Ryan (eds), 188–189. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005b. Dual voice hypothesis. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, D. Herman, M. Jahn & M. Ryan (eds), 127. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1987. Postmodernist Fiction. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983. Unspeakable sentences, unnatural acts: Linguistics and poetics revisited. Poetics Today 4(1): 17–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978. Free Indirect Discourse: A survey of recent accounts. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature 3: 249–78.Google Scholar
Mey, J. 1998. When Voices Clash: A Study in Literary Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Michels, J. 1983. Scylla and Charybdis: Revenge in James Joyce’s Ulysses . The James Joyce Quarterly 20(2): 175–192.Google Scholar
Nakabayashi, M. 2011. The Rhetoric of the Unselfconscious in D.H. Lawrence: Verbalising the Non-verbal in the Lady Chatterley Novels. New York NY: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Neumann, A. 1986. Characterisation and comment in Pride and Prejudice: Free Indirect Discourse and “double voiced” verbs of speaking, thinking and feeling. Style 20(3): 364–394.Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, K. 2010. Viewpoint and construction grammar: The case of past + now. Language and Literature 19: 265–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nørgaard, N. et al. 2010. Key Terms in Stylistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Nuttall, L. 2017. Online readers between the camps: A text-world theory analysis of ethical positioning in Let’s Talk about Kevin . Language and Literature 26(2): 153–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Attributing minds to vampires in Richard Matheson’s I am Legend . Language and Literature 24(1): 23–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED 2015. “think”. OED Online. Oxford University Press (25 January 2015).Google Scholar
2015. “represent”. OED Online. Oxford University Press (9 March 2015).Google Scholar
O’Brien, G. & Opie, J. 2002. Internalizing communication. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 694–5.Google Scholar
Pallarés-Garcia, E. 2014. Narrated Perception and Point of View in the Novels of Jane Austen. PhD dissertation, The University of Sheffield. <[URL]> (2 March 2015).
2012. Narrated perception revisited: The case of Jane Austen’s Emma . Language and Literature 21(2): 170–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. 2011a. Ontologies of consciousness. In The Emergence of Mind, D. Herman (ed.), pp. 243–72. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b. Social minds in fiction and criticism. Style 45(2): 96–143.Google Scholar
2010. Social Minds in the Novel. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
2004. Fictional Minds. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
2002. The construction of fictional minds. Narrative 10(1): 22–46 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascal, R. 1977. The Dual Voice. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Peplow, D. & Carter, R. 2014. Stylistics and real readers. In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, M. Burke (ed.), 440–454. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 1954. Language and thought from the genetic point of view. In Language in Thinking, P. Adams (ed.), 170–179. Baltimore MD: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 2007. The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
1994. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: HarperCollins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plato. 360 B.C.E. [1994–2000]. The Republic. Jowett, B. (tr). In The Internet Classics Archive, D. Stevenson (ed.). <[URL]> (15 April 2013).
Porter, S. 1881. Is thought possible without language? Case of a deaf-mute. The Princeton Review, 104–129. <[URL]> (12 March 2015).
Random House Dictionary. 1983. “ludic”. New York NY: Random House.Google Scholar
. 1983. “ludicrous”. New York NY: Random HouseGoogle Scholar
Reid, S. 1991. To the Lighthouse. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, T. 1996. The (Tom) Swiftean comedy of “Scylla and Charybdis”. In Joyce and Popular Culture, R. Kershner (ed.), 116–124. Gainesville FL: The University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Richter, H. 1970. Virginia Woolf: The Inward Voyage. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, S. 1983. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics, 2nd edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riquelme, J. 1983. Teller and Tale in Joyce’s Fiction: Oscillating Perspectives. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ron, M. 1981. Free Indirect Discourse, mimetic language games, and the subject of fiction. Poetics Today 2(2): 17–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rundquist, E. 2016. Representations of consciousness in Woolf, Lawrence and Joyce: Modernist experimentations with the Free Indirect Style. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, V. Sotirova (ed.), 380–399. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2014. How is Mrs Ramsay thinking? The semantic effects of consciousness presentation categories within the Free Indirect Style. Language and Literature 23(2): 159–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 1940[2013]. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ryu, D. 2005. D.H. Lawrence’s The Rainbow and Women in Love: A Critical Study . Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. 2004. The Paris years. In The Cambridge Companion to Saussure, C. Sanders (ed.), 30–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E. 1983. Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality, D. Mandelbaum (ed). Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne and Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Scheiffer, R. 1992. Modernism and Time: The Logic of Abundance in Literature, Science and Culture 1880–1930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. 2010. Narratology: An Introduction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schönert, J. 2011. Author. In The Living Handbook of Narratology, P. Hühn, J. C. Meister, J. Pier & W. Schmid (eds). Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. <[URL]> (13 April 2012).
Schwarz, D. 2005. Reading the Modern British and Irish Novel: 1890–1930. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. 2007. Mind-style twenty-five years on. Style 41(2): 153–173.Google Scholar
Semino, E. & Short, M. 2004. Corpus Stylistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Semino, E. & Swindlehurst, K. 1996. Metaphor and mind-style in Ken Kesey’s One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Style 30(1): 143–166.Google Scholar
Sheehan, P. 2002. Modernism, Narrative and Humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shore, B. 1987. Is language a prisonhouse? Biological and Cultural Anthropology at Emory University 2(1): 115–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Short, M. 2007. Thought presentation twenty-five years on. Style 41(2): 225–244.Google Scholar
Simpson, P. 1993. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Somer, J. 1994. The self-reflexive arranger in the initial style of James Joyce’s Ulysses . The James Joyce Quarterly 31(2): 65–79.Google Scholar
Sotirova, V. 2013. Consciousness in Modernist Fiction: A Stylistic Study. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. D.H. Lawrence and Narrative Viewpoint. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2007. Woolf’s experiments with consciousness in fiction. In Contemporary Stylistics, P. Stockwell & M. Lambrou (eds), 7–18. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2006. Reader responses to narrative point of view. Poetics 34: 108–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Connectives in Free Indirect Style: Continuity or shift? Language and Literature 13: 216–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Leo 1928. Zur Entstehung der sogenannten “erlebten Rede”, Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 16: 327–32.Google Scholar
Stanzel, F. 1984. A Theory of Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1955[1971]. Narrative Situations in the Novel: Tom Jones, Moby Dick, The Ambassadors, Ulysses. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, E. 1985. Author! Author! James Joyce Quarterly 22(4): 419–425.Google Scholar
Stevens, H. 2007. D. H. Lawrence: organicism and the Modernist novel. In The Cambridge Companion to the Modernist Novel, M. Shiach (ed.), 137–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R. 1992. Modernist Fiction: An Introduction. Louisville KY: The University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. 2014. War, worlds and cognitive grammar. In Harrison et al. (eds), 17–34.Google Scholar
2009. Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. & Mahlberg, M. 2015. Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield . Language and Literature 24 (2): 129–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P. & Whitely, S. 2014. Introduction to The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics , P. Stockwell & S. Whitely (eds), 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Susman, M. 1910. Das Wesen der Modernen deutschen Lyric. Stuttgart: Strecker & Strecker.Google Scholar
Taine, H. 1870. De l’intelligence, Vol. 2. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 2003. Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Toolan, M. 2001. Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1996. Language in Literature: An Introduction to Stylistics. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Pratt, M. L. 1980. Linguistics for Students of Literature. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Trotter, D. 1999. The Modernist novel. In The Cambridge Companion to Modernism, M. Levenson (ed), 69–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. The English Novel in History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turner, M. 1987. Death is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1991. Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Uspensky, B. 1973. A Poetics of Composition: The Structure of the Artistic Text and Typology of Compositional Form, V. Savarin & S. Wittig (trans.) Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, L. 2009. Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive Functional analysis. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verdonk, P. 2002. Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V. N. 1929[1973]. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik (trans.). New York NY: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1962. Thought and word. In Language in Thinking, P. Adams (ed.), 180–213. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Wales, K. 2001. A Dictionary of Stylistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1992. The Language of James Joyce. New York NY: St. Martin’s Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallace, J. 2007. Modernists on the art of fiction. In The Cambridge Companion to the Modernist Novel, M. Shiach (ed.), 15–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh, R. 1997. Who is the narrator? Poetics Today 18: 495–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waugh, P. 1984. Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-conscious Fiction. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Wexler, J. P. 1977. Who Paid for Modernism?: Art, Money, and Fiction of Conrad, Joyce, and Lawrence. Fayetteville AR: The University of Arkansas Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, J. Carroll (ed.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wicht, W. 2009. At the Frontiers of Narrative: James Joyce’s Ulysses’. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 57(2): 153–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. & Beardsley, M. 1946[1954]. The intentional fallacy. In The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry, W. Wimsatt & M. Beardsley (eds), 3–18. Louisville KY: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1921. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1953. Philosophical Investigations. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woolf, V. 1985. A sketch of the past. In Moments of Being, J. Schulkind (ed.), 63–139. New York NY: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
1927[1994]. To the Lighthouse. London: Wordsworth.Google Scholar
1924. Mr Bennet and Mrs Brown, London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
1919a. Modern Novels. The Times Literary Supplement. April 10, 1919. <[URL]> (20 July 2014)
1919b[1984]. Modern fiction. In The Essays of Virginia Woolf, Vol. 4, A. McNeille (ed.), 160–169. San Diego CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Worthen, J. 1979. D.H. Lawrence and the Idea of the Novel. London: The Macmillan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. 1995a. The subject, the speaker and experiential syntax. In Subjecthood and Subjectivity, M. Yaguello (ed.), 148–167. Paris: Ophrys. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995b. Subjectivity and experiential syntax. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, S. Wright & D. Stein (eds), 151–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žižek, S. 1997. The big Other doesn’t exist. Journal of European Psychoanalysis. <[URL]> (12 June 2015)
Zunshine, L. 2011. Style brings in mental states. Style 45(2): 349–356.Google Scholar
2006. Why We Read Fiction. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar