Part of
The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter
Edited by Manuel Jobert and Sandrine Sorlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 30] 2018
► pp. 119
References (65)
References
Attardo, Salvatore. 2000a. Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 793–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000b. Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. RASK: Internationalt Tidsskrift for Sprogog Kommunikation 12: 3–20.Google Scholar
Barbe, Katharina. 1993. Isn’t it ironic that…? Explicit irony markers. Journal of Pragmatics 20: 578–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Irony in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 34]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, Elizabeth. 2006. Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. 1974. A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian. 1990. Listening to Spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Gerrig, Richard. 1984. On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1): 121–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert & O’Brien, Jennifer. 2000. Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1557–1583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert L. 2007. Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. In Irony in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader, Raymond W. Gibbs & Herbert L. Colston (eds), 319–338. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Crystal, David & Quirk, Randolph. 1964. Systems of Prosodic and Paralinguistic Features in English. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Kaplan, Joan & Winner, Ellen. 2007. Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. In Irony in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader, Raymond W. Gibbs & Herbert L. Colston (eds), 297–317. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1980. Les Echelles argumentatives. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
. 2010. Ironie et négation. In Ironie et un peu plus. Hommage à Oswald Ducrot pour son 80ème anniversaire, Vahram Atayan & Ursula Wienen (eds), 169–179. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2008. No aggression, only teasing: The pragmatics of teasing and banter. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4(2): 241–261 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2011. The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Irony from a neo-Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature. Intercultural Pragmatics 10: 403–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humor 27(4): 619–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Pejoration via sarcastic irony and sarcasm. In Pejoration [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 228], Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer & Heike Wiese (eds), 219–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontanier, Pierre. 1830[1977]. Les figures du discours. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Fox, Kate. 2004. Watching the English. The Hidden Rule of English Behaviour. London: Hodder.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2002. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 457–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 1995. On irony and negation. Discourse Processes 19: 239–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Discourse coherence and the theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 17–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Will anticipating irony facilitate it immediately? In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, Marta Dynel (ed.), 19–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer. 1999. On understanding familiar and less familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1601–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Fein, Ofer, Laadan, Dafna, Wolfson, Jon, Zeituny, Michal, Kidrons, Ran, Kaufman, Ronnie & Shaham, Ronit. 2007. Expecting irony: Context vs. salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol 22(2): 119–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2000. Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies 2(2): 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keltner, Dacher, Young, Randall C., Heery, Erin A., Oeming, Carmen & Monarch, Natalie D. 1998. Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(5): 1231–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keltner, Dacher, Capps, Lisa, Kring, Ann M., Young, Randall C. & Heerey, Erin A. 2001. Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin 127(2): 229–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1980. L’ironie comme trope. Poétique 41: 108–127.Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J. & Glucksberg, Sam. 1989. How to be sarcastic: The reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 112–120.Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger, Long, Debra & Church, Mary. 1991. On being ironic: Pragmatic and mnemonic implications. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 6: 149–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Glucksberg, Sam & Brown, Mary. 2007. How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. In Irony in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader, Raymond W. Gibbs & Herbert L. Colston (eds), 57–95. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Studies in the Black Vernacular. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Le Guern, Michel. 1975. Eléments pour une histoire de la notion d’ironie. Linguistique et Semiology 2: 47–59.Google Scholar
Louw, Bill. 1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 157–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacInnes, Paul. 2011. The Art of Banter: ‘It’s like a boxing match. It can be bruising’. The Guardian, Tuesday 8 November.Google Scholar
Morini, Massimiliano. 2010. The poetics of disengagement: Jane Austen and echoic irony. Language and Literature 19(4): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Irony. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Styistics, Violeta Sotirova (ed.), 553–566. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Muecke, Douglas C. 1970. Irony. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2007. Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1547–1569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peleg, Orna, Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer. 2008. Resisting contextual information: You can’t put a salient meaning down. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4: 13–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm & Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. 1954. Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Shelley, Cameron. 2001. The bicoherence theory of situational irony. Cognitive Science 25: 775–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 2011. “That’s not ironic, that’s just stupid.” Towards an eclectic account of the discourse of irony. In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, Marta Dynel (ed.), 33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seto, Ken-ichi. 1998. On non-echoic irony. In Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 37], Robyn Carston & Seiji Uchida (eds), 240–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 295–318. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. On verbal irony. Lingua 87: 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toplak, Mary & Katz, Albert. 2000. On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1467–1488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Utsumi, Akira. 2000. Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1777–1806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Overbeke, Maurits. 2004. Quand rire, c’est “faire rire aux dépens”. Notes sur l’ironie. In Seduction, Community, Speech [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 127], Frank Brisard, Michael Meeuwis & Bart Vandenabeele (eds), 97–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo and pretence? Lingua 116: 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 59: 40–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Sorlin, Sandrine & Tuija Virtanen
2024. Chapter 2. A pragmatic model of hypocrisy. In The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 343],  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
2020. Covert hate speech. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2  pp. 262 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.