Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter
Edited by Manuel Jobert and Sandrine Sorlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 30] 2018
► pp. 1–19

Chapter 7
The face-value of place-work in William Makepeace Thackeray’s handling of irony

| Université Paris-8 Saint-Denis
Irony is admittedly a well-established and well-documented feature in William Makepeace Thackeray’s works, but the present contribution undertakes to study its textual mechanisms in light of pragmatic theories complemented with a specific , referred to as “place-work.” The purpose is to highlight that from the perspectives of both creation and reception, the mechanisms of Thackerayan irony involve the distribution of one, two or three “places,” alternately or cumulatively occupied by the and his addressee(s), whether narrator, commentator, characters, and readers alike. This ever-changing “topology” of irony results in the constant reshuffling of roles and places typically at work in Thackeray’s writings, and underlines as well the structural instability of irony.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Topology of irony: Placework and speaker’s strategy
    • 2.1The one-place structure of self-directed irony
    • 2.2The two-place structure of irony directed to others
    • 2.3The three-place structure of redirected irony
  • 3.Topography of irony: Placework and hearer’s reception
    • 3.1The one-place structure of of irony
    • 3.2The two-place structure of flagged irony
    • 3.3The three-place configuration of sign-posted irony
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.30.07fro
References (36)
References
Abrams, Meyer Howard. 1981[1941]. A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Brimley, George. 1968[1852]. Henry Esmond. In The Critical Heritage, Geoffrey Tillotson & Donald Hawes (eds), 136–144. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen. 1987[1978]. Politeness – Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. 1832. Biography. Fraser’s Magazine 5: 253–60.Google Scholar
Catalan, Zelma. 2009. The Politics of Irony in Thackeray’s Mature Fiction: Vanity Fair, The History of Henry Esmond, The Newcomes. Sofia: St Kliment Ohridski University Press.Google Scholar
Cuddon, John Anthony. 1977. Dictionary of Literay Terms and Literary Theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Forster, John. 1968[1848]. Review on W. M. Thackeray . In The Critical Heritage, Geoffrey Tillotson & Donald Hawes (eds), 53–61. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greig, John Young Thomson. 1959. Thackeray, A Reconsideration. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jankélévitch, Vladimir. 1964. L’Ironie. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1996. La Conversation. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Las Vergnas, Raymond. 1932. W. M. Thackeray. L’homme – le penseur – le romancier. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Lecercle, Jean-Jacques. 2008. Y a-t-il de l’humour dans Alice? Libres Cahiers pour la Psychanalyse 17 : 73–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morreall, John. 1983. Taking Laughter Seriously. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2011. Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1786–1800. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, Catherine. 1999. Thackeray, a Writer’s Life. Phoenix Mill, Thrupp, Stroud: Sutton Publishing.Google Scholar
Ray, Gordon (ed.). 1946. The Letters of W. M. Thackeray, Vol. IV. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1979. The logical status of fictional discourse. In Expression and Meaning, 58–75. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Radical Pragmatics, 295–318. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. On verbal irony. Lingua 7: 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, John. 1983. Introduction and notes to Vanity Fair . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1994. Introduction and notes to The History of Pendennis . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan. 2015[1729]. A Modest Proposal. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. 1909[1842]. Novels by Eminent Hands. In The Works of W. M. Thackeray in Thirteen Volumes, Vol. 6, 456–537. London: Smith, Elder and Co.Google Scholar
. 1911[1842]. The Irish Sketch Book. New York NY: Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
. 1984[1844, revised in 1856]. The History of Barry Lyndon. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1945[1848]. The Book of Snobs. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
. 1983[1848]. Vanity Fair, A Novel Without a Hero. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1994[1850]. The History of Pendennis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1912[1852]. Charity and Humour. London: Dent.Google Scholar
. 1995[1855]. The Newcomes. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1961[1860]. The Virginians. London: Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
. 1946[1860]. Thorn in the Cushion. In Roundabout Papers, 55–65. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. 1925[1879]. Thackeray. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4 ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.