Part of
The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter
Edited by Manuel Jobert and Sandrine Sorlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 30] 2018
► pp. 119
Abrams, Meyer Howard
1981[1941]A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Brimley, George
1968[1852]Henry Esmond. In The Critical Heritage, Geoffrey Tillotson & Donald Hawes (eds), 136–144. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen
1987[1978]Politeness – Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas
1832Biography. Fraser’s Magazine 5: 253–60.Google Scholar
Catalan, Zelma
2009The Politics of Irony in Thackeray’s Mature Fiction: Vanity Fair, The History of Henry Esmond, The Newcomes. Sofia: St Kliment Ohridski University Press.Google Scholar
Cuddon, John Anthony
1977Dictionary of Literay Terms and Literary Theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Forster, John
1968[1848] Review on W. M. Thackeray . In The Critical Heritage, Geoffrey Tillotson & Donald Hawes (eds), 53–61. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greig, John Young Thomson
1959Thackeray, A Reconsideration. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jankélévitch, Vladimir
1964L’Ironie. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1996La Conversation. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Las Vergnas, Raymond
1932W. M. Thackeray. L’homme – le penseur – le romancier. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Lecercle, Jean-Jacques
2008Y a-t-il de l’humour dans Alice? Libres Cahiers pour la Psychanalyse 17 : 73–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morreall, John
1983Taking Laughter Seriously. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan
2011Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1786–1800. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, Catherine
1999Thackeray, a Writer’s Life. Phoenix Mill, Thrupp, Stroud: Sutton Publishing.Google Scholar
Ray, Gordon
(ed.) 1946The Letters of W. M. Thackeray, Vol. IV. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1979The logical status of fictional discourse. In Expression and Meaning, 58–75. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1981Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Radical Pragmatics, 295–318. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992On verbal irony. Lingua 7: 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, John
1983 Introduction and notes to Vanity Fair . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1994 Introduction and notes to The History of Pendennis . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan
2015[1729]A Modest Proposal. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace
1909[1842]Novels by Eminent Hands. In The Works of W. M. Thackeray in Thirteen Volumes, Vol. 6, 456–537. London: Smith, Elder and Co.Google Scholar
1911[1842]The Irish Sketch Book. New York NY: Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
1984[1844, revised in 1856]The History of Barry Lyndon. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1945[1848]The Book of Snobs. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
1983[1848]Vanity Fair, A Novel Without a Hero. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1994[1850]The History of Pendennis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1912[1852]Charity and Humour. London: Dent.Google Scholar
1995[1855]The Newcomes. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1961[1860]The Virginians. London: Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
1946[1860]Thorn in the Cushion. In Roundabout Papers, 55–65. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony
1925[1879]Thackeray. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4  pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.