This chapter examines how ironic utterances in online news forums are used for the purpose of collective positioning of the commenting readers in opposition to other groups. Approaching irony as an act of echoic
interpretation, the analysis focuses on how readers echo both the representations made by the media texts and the beliefs and ideologies presumed to be held by other social actors. It is argued that through irony, readers express their oppositional attitudes, disaffiliating themselves from the ironized social actors and their real or assumed representations. Simultaneously, ironists enforce their own opinions and standpoints, which are not just personal but – as argued in the paper – representative of a larger group to which the commenter belongs. By tracing how irony is used in reader comments to delegitimize dissonant views and emphasize contrastive self-positioning, this paper seeks to extend the application of an interactional pragmatic approach to irony by adding a critical discourse analytical dimension to it.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.Online comments and discussion forums
3.Data and analysis
3.1Irony and echoic mention
3.1.1
Echoic mention of primary media texts
3.1.2
Echoic mention of non-media texts and intertextuality
Už i Rakousko staví plot. Chce usměrnit proud běženců ze Slovinska. [Even Austria is building a fence. It wants to channel the flow of migrants from Slovenia]. idnes.cz, 13November2015. <[URL]>
Rakušané v Alpách postaví 370 metrů dlouhý plot, Itálii se to nelíbí. [Austrians to build a 370-metre fence in the Alps, Italy does not like it]. idnes.cz, 27April2016. <[URL]>
Prevence proti uprchlíkům. Rakousko chystá plot na hranicích s Maďarskem. [Prevention against refugees. Austria prepares a fence on borders with Hungary]. idnes.cz, 20September2016. <[URL]>
References
Alba-Juez, Laura & Attardo, Salvatore. 2014. The evaluative palette of verbal irony. In Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242], Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds), 93–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Attardo, Salvatore. 2000. Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32(6): 793–826.
Attardo, Salvatore. 2001. Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Attardo, Salvatore. 2006. Irony. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Keith Eward Brown (ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, Michael Holquist (ed.). Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Burgers, Christian, van Mulken, Margot & Schellens, Peter Jan. 2011. Finding irony: An introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol 26(3): 186–205.
Cap, Piotr. 2008. Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 17–41.
Chovanec, Jan. 2012a. Conversational humour and joint fantasizing in online journalism. In Language and Humour in the Media, Jan Chovanec & Isabel Ermida (eds), 139–161. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Chovanec, Jan. 2012b. Implicit meaning and racism in political advertising. In Discourse Interpretation: Approaches and Applications, Olga Dontcheva-Navratilova & Renata Povolná (eds), 55–77. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Chovanec, Jan. 2017a. Participating with media. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Media, Colleen Cotter & Daniel Perrin (eds), 505–522. London: Routledge.
Clift, Rebecca. 1999. Irony in conversation. Language in Society 28: 528–553.
Dynel, Marta. 2014. Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humor 27(4): 619–639.
Dynel, Marta. 2017. The irony of irony: Irony based on truthfulness. Corpus Pragmatics 1(1): 3–36.
El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2001. Metaphors we discriminate by: Naturalized themes in Austrian newspaper articles about asylum seekers. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(3): 352–371.
El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2005. ‘Our purebred ethnic compatriots’: Irony in newspaper journalism. Journal of Pragmatics 37(6): 781–797.
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
Goodman, Simon & Rowe, Lottie. 2014. ‘Maybe it is prejudice… but it is NOT racism’: Negotiating racism in discussion forums about Gypsies. Discourse & Society 25(1): 32–46.
Hardaker, Claire. 2010. Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research 6: 215–252.
Harré, Rom & Van Langenhove, Luk. 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science. New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hopkinson, Christopher. 2013. Trolling in online discussions: From provocation to community-building. Brno Studies in English 39(1): 5–25.
Johansson, Marjut. 2015. Bravo for this editorial! Users’ comments in discussion forums. In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 60], Elda Weizman & Anita Fetzer (eds), 83–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kapogianni, Eleni. 2011. Irony via “surrealism”. In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210], Marta Dynel (ed.), 51–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kotthoff, Helga. 2003. Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35(9): 1387–1411.
Laineste, Liisi. 2013. Funny or aggressive? Failed humour in internet comments. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore 53: 29–46.
Laineste, Liisi. 2017. Othering in Estonian online discussions about refugees. In Representing the Other in European Media Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 74], Jan Chovanec & Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska (eds), 281–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Moghaddam, Fathali & Harré, Rom. 2010. Words, conflicts and political processes. In Words of Conflict, Words of War: How the Language We Use in Political Processes Sparks Fighting, Fathali Moghaddam & Rom Harré (eds), 1–27. Santa Barbara CA: Praeger.
Musolff, Andreas. 2010. Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic. London: Routledge.
Partington, Alan. 2006. The Linguistics of Laughter. A corpus-assisted study of laughter-talk. New York: Routledge.
Partington, Alan. 2007. Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3): 1547–1569.
Reisigl, Martin & Wodak, Ruth. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-semitism. London: Routledge.
Santa Ana, Otto. 1999. ‘Like an animal I was treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society 10(2): 191–224.
Shilikhina, Ksenia. 2018. Discourse markers as guides to understanding spontaneous humor and irony. InThe Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters [Topics in Humor Research 7], Villy Tsakona & Jan Chovanec (eds), 57–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stallone, Letícia & Haugh, Michael. 2016. Joint fantasising as relational practice in Brazilian Portuguese interactions. Language & Communication 55: 10–23.
Tsakona, Villy. 2018. Online joint fictionalization. In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters [Topics in Humor Research 7], Villy Tsakona & Jan Chovanec (eds), 229–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Dijk, Teun. 1998. Opinions and ideologies in the press. In Approaches to Media Discourse, Allan Bell & Peter Garrett (eds), 21–63. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse and Communication 1: 91–112.
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?Lingua 116(10): 1722–1743.
Wirth-Koliba, Victoria. 2016. The diverse and dynamic world of ‘us’ and ‘them’ in political discourse. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 8(1): 23–37.
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The discourse-historical approach. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 63–94. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. Suppression of the Nazi past, coded languages, and discourses of silence: Applying the discourse-historical approach to post-war anti-semitism in Austria. In Political Languages in the Age of Extremes, Willibald Steinmetz (ed.), 351–379. Oxford: OUP.
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth, de Cillia, Rudolf, Reisigl, Martin & Liebhart, Karin. 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: EUP.
2023. Irony in Linguistic Communication. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 129 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.