Part of
Style, Rhetoric and Creativity in Language: In memory of Walter (Bill) Nash (1926-2015)Edited by Paul Simpson
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 34] 2019
► pp. 57–76
Edited by Paul Simpson
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 34] 2019
► pp. 57–76
Chapter 3The doubling of design in Walter Nash’s Rhetoric
The Wit of Persuasion
This chapter takes as its point of departure a simple diagram which appears at the beginning of Walter Nash’s (1989) Rhetoric: The Wit of Persuasion. As argued, this diagram offers a key to understanding Nash’s unique conception of classical, renaissance and modern rhetoric. Focusing upon the rhetorical canon of taxis/disposition, or arrangement, the chapter explores how Nash celebrates the skill of writers of canonical literary texts, and of canny speakers in everyday situations, to design powerful schemes of persuasion. It is suggested that listeners and readers appreciate the aesthetic realization of language designed to persuade. The author observes how Nash’s approach is to encourage receivers of language actively to take power in rhetorical situations by parodying and rewriting, in order to critically understand and creatively revise these schemes of persuasion. These observations are complemented by an analysis of a press conference held by US President Donald Trump’s first press secretary, Sean Spicer.
Keywords: CNN, disposition (in rhetoric analysis), ‘mythogram’, persuasion, political speech, rhetorical,
taxis
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Rhetoric, basically defined
- 3.A complication in the definition, a problem in the theory
- 4.Power in parody
- 5.Diagrammatic taxis
- 6.“And Jim Acosta Joins Us Now”: Diagrammatic taxis at CNN
- 7.Conclusion: Design within design = “observing ourselves, while acting”
-
References
References
Anderson Cooper Transcripts
Booth, W. C.
1961 [1984] The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Burke, K.
1937 [1984] Attitudes toward History. 3rd edn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
CNN
Cockcroft, R. & Cockcroft, S. M.
1992 Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. London: MacMillan. 
Eagleton, T.
2014 How to Read Literature. New Haven, NJ: Yale UP.
Fahnestock, J.
2005 Rhetorical stylistics. Language and Literature 14(3): 215–230.
The Forest of Rhetoric
Haskins, E.
2007 Between archive and participation: Public memory in a
digital age. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 37(4): 401–422.
Nash, W.
1989 Rhetoric: The Wit of Persuasion. Oxford: Blackwell.
1992 An Uncommon Tongue: The Uses and Resources of English. London: Routledge.
Los Angeles Times
2017a Citing no evidence, Trump accuses Obama of tapping his
phones during the election. Los Angeles Times 4 March 2017 [URL] (27 March 2019)
Phelan, J.
1996 Narrative as Rhetoric: Technique, Audiences, Ethics,
Ideology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Pope, R.
1995 Textual Intervention: Critical and Creative Strategies for
Literary Studies. London: Routledge.
Ramage, J. D.
2006 Rhetoric: A User’s Guide. New York: Pearson.
Spicer, S.
2017 Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean
Spicer. The White
House 16 March 2017 [URL] (2 March 2018).
Wardy, R.
2016 Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato and Their Successors. London: Routledge.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 454 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.