Chapter 5
A cognitive and cultural reader response theory of character construction
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Context, literary reading, and cultural models
- 3.A cognitive and cultural reader response theory of character construction
- 3.1Cultural models in character construction: Categorical knowledge and interpretive patterns
- 3.2
The cultural model of character
- 4.Toward the (empirical) analysis of cultural models at work
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (59)
References
Barsalou, L. 2016. Situated conceptualization offers a theoretical account of social priming. Current Opinion in Psychology 12: 6–11. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bennardo, G., & de Munck, V. C. 2014. Cultural Models: Genesis, Methods, and Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caracciolo, M. 2014. The Experientiality of Narrative: An Enactivist Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culler, J. D. 2002 [1973]. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, J. 2001. Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow England, N.Y: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, J. & Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. 2017. Fictional characterisation. In Handbooks of Pragmatics [HOPS]: Vol. 12. Pragmatics of Fiction, M. A. Locher (ed.), 93–128. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eder, J. 2008. Die Figur im Film: Grundlagen der Figurenanalyse. Marburg: Schüren.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eder, J., Jannidis, F. & Schneider, R. 2010. Characters in fictional worlds. An introduction. In Revisionen: Vol. 3. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media, J. Eder, F. Jannidis, & R. Schneider (eds), 3–66. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emmott, C. 2004 [1999]. Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Finney, B. 2002. Bonded by language: Jeanette Winterson’s Written on the Body. Women and Language 15(2): 23–31.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fish, S. 1980. Is There a Text in this Class: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. 1999. The continuum model: Ten years later. In Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, 3rd ed., S. Chaiken & S. Trope (eds), 231–254. New York, NY: Guilford.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D. 2003. Decontextualizing and recontextualizing tendencies in 20th century linguistics and literary theory. In Anglistentag 2002 Bayreuth: Proceedings, E. Mengel, H-J. Schmid & M. Steppat (eds), 369–379. Trier: WVT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gerrig, R. J., & Allbritton, D. W. 1990. The construction of literary character: A view from cognitive psychology. Style 24 (3): 32–43.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gumperz, J. J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gumperz, J. J. 1992. Contextualization revisited. In The Contextualization of Language, P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (eds), 39–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herman, D. 2011. Post-cartesian approaches to narrative and mind: A response to Alan Palmer’s target essay on “social minds”. Style: A Quarterly Journal of Aesthetics, Poetics, Stylistics, and Literary Criticism 45(2): 265–271.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iser, W. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, ML: Johns Hopkins University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jannidis, F. 2004. Figur und Person: Beitrag zu einer historischen Narratologie. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kukkonen, K. 2016. Bayesian bodies: The predictive dimension of embodied cognition and culture. In The Cognitive Humanities: Embodied Mind in Literature and Culture, P. Garratt (ed.), 153–167. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kukkonen, K. & Caracciolo, M. 2014. Cognitive literary study: Second generation approaches [special issue]. Style: A Quarterly Journal of Aesthetics, Poetics, Stylistics, and Literary Criticism 48(3): 261–424.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kutsch, C. forthcoming.
Empirically Investigating (Triggers of) Experientiality: A Contribution to Cognitive Narratology
. PhD Thesis. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen.
Lindenmeyer, Antje. 1999. Postmodern concepts of the body in Jeanette Winterson’s Written on the Body. Feminist Review 63: 48–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mahlberg, M., Stockwell, P., Joode, J. d., Smith, C. & O’Donnell, M. B. 2016. CLiC Dickens: Novel uses of concordances for the integration of corpus stylistics and cognitive poetics. Corpora 11(3): 433–463. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Margolin, U. 1986. The doer and the deed: Action as a basis for characterization in narrative. Poetics Today 7(2): 205–225. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Margolin, U. 2007. Character. In The Cambridge Companion to Narrative, D. Herman (ed.), 66–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martel, Y. 2016 [2002]. Life of Pi. Edinburgh: Canongate.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McAvan, E. 2011. Ambiguity and apophatic bodies in Jeanette Winterson’s Written on the Body
. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 52(4): 434–43.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCabe, J., Tanner, A. E. & Heiman, J. R. 2010. The Impact of gender expectations on meanings of sex and sexuality: Results from a cognitive interview study. Sex Roles 62(3): 252–63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Minsky, M. 1979. A framework for representing knowledge. In Frame Conceptions and Text Understanding, D. Metzing (ed.), 1–25. Berlin: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, A. 2004. Fictional Minds. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pfister, M. 1993 [1988]. The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Phelan, J. 1989. Reading People, Reading Plots: Character Progression and the Interpretation of Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reali, C., Esaulova, Y., Öttl, A. & von Stockhausen, L. 2015. Role descriptions induce gender mismatch effects in eye movements during reading. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1607. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rhys, J. 2017 [1976]. I used to live here once. In The Collected Short Stories, 387–388. London: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roepstorff, A., Niewöhner, J. & Beck, S. 2010. Enculturing brains through neural networks. Neural Networks 23: 1051–1059. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, H-J. 2003. An outline of the role of context in comprehension. In Anglistentag Bayreuth 2002: Proceedings, E. Mengel, H-J. Schmid & M. Steppat (eds), 435–445. Trier: WVT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schneider, R. 2000. Grundriss zur kognitiven Theorie der Figurenrezeption am Beispiel des viktorianischen Romans. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schneider, R. 2001. Toward a cognitive theory of literary character: The dynamics of mental-model construction. Style 35(4): 607–640.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schneider, R. 2013. The cognitive theory of character reception: An updated proposal. Anglistik 24(2): 117–134.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stockwell, P. 2009. Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stockwell, P. & Mahlberg, M. 2015. Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield
. Language and Literature 24(2): 129–147. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strasen, S. 2008a. Rezeptionstheorien: Literatur-, sprach- und kulturwissenschaftliche Ansätze und kulturelle Modelle. Trier: WVT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strasen, S. 2008b. Cultural models, cognitive environments, and the reading of literary texts: Towards a cognitive re-invigoration of reader-response theory. In Anglistentag Münster 2007: Proceedings, K. Stierstorfer (ed.), 199–207. Trier: WVT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strasen, S. 2013. The return of the reader: The disappearance of literary reception theories and their revival as a part of a cognitive theory of culture. Anglistik 24(2): 31–48.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strauss, C. & Quinn, N. 1997. A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thorne, J., Rowling, J. K. & Tiffany, J. 2016. Harry Potter and the Cursed Child: Parts One and Two. New York, NY: Arthur A. Levine Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Toolan, M. J. 1988. Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trienekens, L. & Rosenow, C. 2018. Readers’ emotional response as triggered by socio-cultural conceptualizations in fictional literature: A multimodal approach.
European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference 2018
, Pavia, 5 July 2018.
Vaeßen, J. 2018.
Cultural Models and the Construction of Literary Character. Toward a Cognitive and Cultural Theory of Reception
. Unpublished PhD Thesis. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen.
van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vermeule, B. 2010. Why Do We Care about Literary Characters? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winterson, J. 1993. Written on the Body. London: Vintage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Y. & Lauer, G. 2015. How culture shapes the reading of fairy tales: A cross-cultural approach. Comparative Literature Studies 52(4): 663–681. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zunshine, L. 2006. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwaan, R. A. 2014. Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18(5): 229–234. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwaan, R. A. 2016. Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23: 1028–1034. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Drakopoulos, Georgios, Ioanna Giannoukou, Phivos Mylonas & Spyros Sioutas
2022.
Self organizing maps for cultural content delivery.
Neural Computing and Applications 34:22
► pp. 19547 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Price, Hazel
2022.
The year’s work in stylistics 2021.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4
► pp. 519 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Schneider, Ralf
2021.
Iconographies of ‘Childness’ and the Contemporary British Novel: Book Covers, Discourses, and Cultural Models.
Anglia 139:4
► pp. 710 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.