Part of
Style and Reader Response: Minds, media, methods
Edited by Alice Bell, Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons and David Peplow
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 36] 2021
► pp. 8198
References (59)
References
Barsalou, L. 2016. Situated conceptualization offers a theoretical account of social priming. Current Opinion in Psychology 12: 6–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennardo, G., & de Munck, V. C. 2014. Cultural Models: Genesis, Methods, and Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caracciolo, M. 2014. The Experientiality of Narrative: An Enactivist Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culler, J. D. 2002 [1973]. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. 2001. Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow England, N.Y: Longman.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. & Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. 2017. Fictional characterisation. In Handbooks of Pragmatics [HOPS]: Vol. 12. Pragmatics of Fiction, M. A. Locher (ed.), 93–128. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eder, J. 2008. Die Figur im Film: Grundlagen der Figurenanalyse. Marburg: Schüren.Google Scholar
Eder, J., Jannidis, F. & Schneider, R. 2010. Characters in fictional worlds. An introduction. In Revisionen: Vol. 3. Characters in Fictional Worlds. Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media, J. Eder, F. Jannidis, & R. Schneider (eds), 3–66. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Emmott, C. 2004 [1999]. Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finney, B. 2002. Bonded by language: Jeanette Winterson’s Written on the Body. Women and Language 15(2): 23–31.Google Scholar
Fish, S. 1980. Is There a Text in this Class: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. 1999. The continuum model: Ten years later. In Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, 3rd ed., S. Chaiken & S. Trope (eds), 231–254. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. 2003. Decontextualizing and recontextualizing tendencies in 20th century linguistics and literary theory. In Anglistentag 2002 Bayreuth: Proceedings, E. Mengel, H-J. Schmid & M. Steppat (eds), 369–379. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Allbritton, D. W. 1990. The construction of literary character: A view from cognitive psychology. Style 24 (3): 32–43.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. Contextualization revisited. In The Contextualization of Language, P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (eds), 39–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herman, D. 2011. Post-cartesian approaches to narrative and mind: A response to Alan Palmer’s target essay on “social minds”. Style: A Quarterly Journal of Aesthetics, Poetics, Stylistics, and Literary Criticism 45(2): 265–271.Google Scholar
Iser, W. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, ML: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jannidis, F. 2004. Figur und Person: Beitrag zu einer historischen Narratologie. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, K. 2016. Bayesian bodies: The predictive dimension of embodied cognition and culture. In The Cognitive Humanities: Embodied Mind in Literature and Culture, P. Garratt (ed.), 153–167. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kukkonen, K. & Caracciolo, M. 2014. Cognitive literary study: Second generation approaches [special issue]. Style: A Quarterly Journal of Aesthetics, Poetics, Stylistics, and Literary Criticism 48(3): 261–424.Google Scholar
Kutsch, C. forthcoming. Empirically Investigating (Triggers of) Experientiality: A Contribution to Cognitive Narratology . PhD Thesis. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen.
Lindenmeyer, Antje. 1999. Postmodern concepts of the body in Jeanette Winterson’s Written on the Body. Feminist Review 63: 48–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M., Stockwell, P., Joode, J. d., Smith, C. & O’Donnell, M. B. 2016. CLiC Dickens: Novel uses of concordances for the integration of corpus stylistics and cognitive poetics. Corpora 11(3): 433–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margolin, U. 1986. The doer and the deed: Action as a basis for characterization in narrative. Poetics Today 7(2): 205–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Character. In The Cambridge Companion to Narrative, D. Herman (ed.), 66–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martel, Y. 2016 [2002]. Life of Pi. Edinburgh: Canongate.Google Scholar
McAvan, E. 2011. Ambiguity and apophatic bodies in Jeanette Winterson’s Written on the Body . Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 52(4): 434–43.Google Scholar
McCabe, J., Tanner, A. E. & Heiman, J. R. 2010. The Impact of gender expectations on meanings of sex and sexuality: Results from a cognitive interview study. Sex Roles 62(3): 252–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M. 1979. A framework for representing knowledge. In Frame Conceptions and Text Understanding, D. Metzing (ed.), 1–25. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. 2004. Fictional Minds. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Pfister, M. 1993 [1988]. The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phelan, J. 1989. Reading People, Reading Plots: Character Progression and the Interpretation of Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reali, C., Esaulova, Y., Öttl, A. & von Stockhausen, L. 2015. Role descriptions induce gender mismatch effects in eye movements during reading. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhys, J. 2017 [1976]. I used to live here once. In The Collected Short Stories, 387–388. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Roepstorff, A., Niewöhner, J. & Beck, S. 2010. Enculturing brains through neural networks. Neural Networks 23: 1051–1059. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H-J. 2003. An outline of the role of context in comprehension. In Anglistentag Bayreuth 2002: Proceedings, E. Mengel, H-J. Schmid & M. Steppat (eds), 435–445. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
Schneider, R. 2000. Grundriss zur kognitiven Theorie der Figurenrezeption am Beispiel des viktorianischen Romans. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2001. Toward a cognitive theory of literary character: The dynamics of mental-model construction. Style 35(4): 607–640.Google Scholar
2013. The cognitive theory of character reception: An updated proposal. Anglistik 24(2): 117–134.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. 2009. Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. & Mahlberg, M. 2015. Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield . Language and Literature 24(2): 129–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strasen, S. 2008a. Rezeptionstheorien: Literatur-, sprach- und kulturwissenschaftliche Ansätze und kulturelle Modelle. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
2008b. Cultural models, cognitive environments, and the reading of literary texts: Towards a cognitive re-invigoration of reader-response theory. In Anglistentag Münster 2007: Proceedings, K. Stierstorfer (ed.), 199–207. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
2013. The return of the reader: The disappearance of literary reception theories and their revival as a part of a cognitive theory of culture. Anglistik 24(2): 31–48.Google Scholar
Strauss, C. & Quinn, N. 1997. A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thorne, J., Rowling, J. K. & Tiffany, J. 2016. Harry Potter and the Cursed Child: Parts One and Two. New York, NY: Arthur A. Levine Books.Google Scholar
Toolan, M. J. 1988. Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trienekens, L. & Rosenow, C. 2018. Readers’ emotional response as triggered by socio-cultural conceptualizations in fictional literature: A multimodal approach. European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference 2018 , Pavia, 5 July 2018.
Vaeßen, J. 2018. Cultural Models and the Construction of Literary Character. Toward a Cognitive and Cultural Theory of Reception . Unpublished PhD Thesis. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen.
van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
van Peer, W., Hakemulder, F. & Zyngier, S. 2012. Scientific Methods for the Humanities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vermeule, B. 2010. Why Do We Care about Literary Characters? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Winterson, J. 1993. Written on the Body. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. & Lauer, G. 2015. How culture shapes the reading of fairy tales: A cross-cultural approach. Comparative Literature Studies 52(4): 663–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zunshine, L. 2006. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. 2014. Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18(5): 229–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23: 1028–1034. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Ghasseminejad, Melina & María-Ángeles Martínez
2024. Secondary storyworld possible selves: narrative response and cultural (un)predictability. Frontiers of Narrative Studies 10:1  pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Drakopoulos, Georgios, Ioanna Giannoukou, Phivos Mylonas & Spyros Sioutas
2022. Self organizing maps for cultural content delivery. Neural Computing and Applications 34:22  pp. 19547 ff. DOI logo
Price, Hazel
2022. The year’s work in stylistics 2021. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4  pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Ralf
2021. Iconographies of ‘Childness’ and the Contemporary British Novel: Book Covers, Discourses, and Cultural Models. Anglia 139:4  pp. 710 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.