Chapter 7
(Re)mapping “authentic” London
Iain Sinclair’s London Overground (2015) and the
semiotic landscape of London’s East End
Busse and Warnke’s (2015) Urban Linguistic research paradigm is a seminal and precise answer to recent calls for interdisciplinary investigations of urban space/place that include semiotic and linguistic aspects. The methodological, technical and technological consequences of implementing interdisciplinary urban research, however, are manifold and highly complex. This exploratory case study is an attempt to showcase qualitative analyses of how ‘place-making practices’ (cf. Busse and Warnke 2015) manifest in two urban data types. Ideally, such small-scale investigations need to be complemented and contextualised by further quantitative methods and big data sets, such as the heiURBAN corpus by Busse (cf. e.g., Busse 2020). This chapter combines literary analysis of Iain Sinclair’s London Overground (2015) with descriptions of the semiotic landscape of Shoreditch, one of the most prominent gentrifying/gentrified neighbourhoods in London’s East End. It is embedded into my doctoral research of Shoreditch’s semiotic landscape and the analysis hints at how urban places are situated in discourses of urbanity, gentrification, change, authenticity, and commodification. The scope of this article remains small and exploratory but provides insight into some of the aforementioned methodological issues as well as an outlook of what further investigations may focus on.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical deliberations: Making (urban) places
- 3.Sinclair’s London
- 4.The semiotic landscape of Shoreditch
- 5.Literary place-making in London Overground
- 6.Conclusion
-
References
References (43)
References
Agha, A. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Androutsopoulos, J. 2014. Mediatization and sociolinguistic change: Key concepts,
research traditions, open issues. In Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change, J. Androutopoulos (ed.), 3–48. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auer, P. & Schmid, J. E. 2010. Introduction. In Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic
Variation: Volume 1: Theories and Models. P. Auer & J. E. Schmid (eds), vii–xvi. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berning, N., Schulte, P. & Schwanecke, C. 2014. Experiencing Space – Spacing Experience: Concepts, Practices and
Materialities. Trier: WVT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blommaert, J. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Büscher, M. & Urry, J. 2009. Mobile methods and the empirical. European Journal of Social Theory 12(1): 99–116. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Busse, B. 2019. Patterns of Discursive Urban Place-Making in Brooklyn,
New York. In Corpus Linguistics, Context and Culture, V. Wiegand & M. Mahlberg (eds), 13–42. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Busse, B., Smith, J. & Warnke, I. H. 2020. Declaring Places, Placing Declaratives – An
Introduction. In Place Making in the Declarative City, B. Busse, J. Smith & I. H. Warnke, 1–9. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Busse, B. & Warnke, I. H. 2015. Sprache im urbanen Raum. In Handbuch Sprache und Wissen, E. Felder & A. Gardt (eds), 519–538. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chayka, K. 2016. Same old, same old: How the hipster aesthetic is taking
over the world. theguardian.com, 7 August 2016, < [URL]> (18 October 2017).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coupland, N. (ed.). 2013. The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresswell, T. 2004. Place: A Short Introduction. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Debord, G. 1955 [2008]. Introduction to a critique of urban
geography. In Critical Geographies: A Collection of Readings, H. Bauder & S. Engel-Di Mauro (eds), K. Knabb (translator), 23–27. Kelowna: Praxis ePress.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elgin, C. 2007. The laboratory of the mind. In A Sense of the World: Essays on Fiction, Narrative and
Knowledge, W. Huemer, J. Gibson & L. Pocci (eds), 43–54. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Entrikin, J. N. 1991. The Betweenness of Place: Towards a Geography of
Modernity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedmann, J. 2010. Place and place-making in cities: A global
perspective. Planning Theory & Practice 11(2): 149–165. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodman, N. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Hassocks: Harvester Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gorter, D. (ed.). 2006. Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hall, T. & Barrett, H. 2012. Urban Geography. 4th edn. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaworski, A. & Thurlow, C. 2010. Introduction. In Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (eds), 1–40. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, G. R., & van Leeuwen, T. 2001. Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landry, R. & Bourhis, R. Y. 1997. Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An
empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16(1): 23–49. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lees, L., Slater, T. & Wyly, E. K. 2008. Gentrification. New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Macfarlane, R. 2011. Iain Sinclair’s struggles with the city of
London.
theguardian.com, 15 July 2011, < [URL]> (18 October 2017).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, N. 2015. Noise, Neoliberalism and the Matter of London. London: Bloomsbury.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
No Author. No date. London Overground Film with Iain Sinclair. [URL] (18
October 2017).
Pennycook, A. 2010. Language as a Local Practice. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pennycook, A. & Otsuji, E. 2015. Metrolingualism: Language in the City. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. 2003. Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J. A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. Trier: Linguistic Agency, University of Trier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Shohamy, E. & Gorter, D. 2009. Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, I. 2011. Ghost Milk. London: Hamish Hamilton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, I. 2015. London Overground: A Day’s Walk around the Ginger Line. London: Hamish Hamilton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, J. Forthcoming. Semiotic Landscapes. In Handbook of Language and Space, B. Busse & I. H. Warnke (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Smith, J. in preparation. Authenti·City: Discursive Urban Place-Making Strategies in
Shoreditch, London.
Trinch, S. & Snajdr, E. 2017. What the signs say: Gentrification and the disappearance
of capitalism without distinction in Brooklyn. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(1): 64–89. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tuan, Y.-F. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Urban Humanities Initiative. No date. Urban Humanities, <[URL]> (18 October 2017).
Westphal, B. 2011. Geocriticism: Real and Fictional Spaces, R. T. Tally Jr (translator). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westphal, B. 2013. The Plausible World: A Geocritical Approach to Space, Place, and
Maps, A. Wells (translator). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weston, D. 2015. “Against the Grand Project”: Iain Sinclair’s local
London. Contemporary Literature 56(2): 255–279. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weston, D. 2016. Contemporary Literary Landscapes. The Poetics of Experience. London, New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilkens, M. 2015. Digital humanities and its application in the study of
literature and culture. Comparative Literature 67(1): 11–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Price, Hazel
2022.
The year’s work in stylistics 2021.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4
► pp. 519 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.