Chapter 10
“She enjoys being stroked”, “They are affectionate, lively and
interactive boys”
An ecostylistic scrutiny of animal agency and alternative discourse in
Battersea Dogs & Cats Home website
This chapter analyses animal agency in a corpus of texts from the website of Battersea Dogs & Cats Home, an English charity rehoming dogs and cats, more precisely from the cat rehoming gallery. The chapter firstly provides definitions of alternative discourse and of agency in the disciplines of human-animal studies and Hallidayan functional grammar. Secondly, the theoretical framework and methodology of functional grammar are applied to the corpus in order to classify all the processes performed by the cats into the six Hallidayan process types and to examine their stylistic representation. In accordance with the aims and scope of ecostylistics, the main research purpose is to demonstrate that the website constructs an environmentally-conscious alternative discourse instilling respect for the Battersea cats and paying tribute to them as independent living beings with their own experiences and priorities.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The need for alternative discourses on animals and the
environment
- 3.Agency in human-animal studies and functional grammar
- 4.Methodological notes on the corpus
- 5.Methodological notes on the data
- 6.Ecostylistic analysis
- 6.1Relational process type
- 6.2Material process type
- 6.3Mental process type
- 6.4Behavioural, Verbal and Existential process types
- 7.Concluding remarks
-
References
References (27)
References
Anthony, L. 2017. AntConc (Version 3.5.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University, available at <[URL]>.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, S. 1993. Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity and
Representation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Battersea Dogs & Cats Home. No date. “Meet the Cats” rehoming gallery, <[URL]> (corpus built April 2018).
Baudrillard, J. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bekoff, M. (ed.). 2007a. Encyclopedia of Human-Animal Relationships: A Global Exploration
of Our Connections with Animals. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bekoff, M. 2007b. The Emotional Lives of Animals. Novato, CA: New World Library.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burke, M. (ed.). 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, D. 1976. Paralinguistic behaviour as continuity between animal and
human communication. In Language and Man: Anthropological Issues, W. C. McCormack & S. A. Wurm (eds), 13–27. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeMello, M. 2010. Teaching the Animal: Human–Animal Studies Across the
Disciplines. Herndon, VA: Lantern Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th edn. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herman, D. (ed.). 2016. Creatural Fictions: Human-Animal Relationships in Twentieth- and
Twenty-First-Century Literature. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hribal, J. C. 2007. Animals, agency, and class: Writing the history of
animals from below. Human Ecology Review 14(1): 101–112.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hurn, S. 2012. Humans and Other Animals. London: Pluto Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiang, S. Y. 2016. Friendship; or, representing more-than-human
subjectivities and spaces in J.R. Ackerley’s My Dog
Tulip
. In Creatural Fictions: Human-Animal Relationships in Twentieth- and
Twenty-First-Century Literature, D. Herman (ed.), 127–148. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Painter, C. 1997. Working with Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McFarland, S. E. & Hediger, R. (eds). 2009. Animals and Agency: An Interdisciplinary Exploration. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nyman, J. 2016. Horsescapes: Space, nation, and human-horse relations in
Jane Smiley’s Horse Heaven
. In Creatural Fictions: Human-Animal Relationships in Twentieth- and
Twenty-First-Century Literature, D. Herman (ed.), 217–239. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Singer, P. 1975. Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for our Treatment of
Animals. New York: Random House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sotirova, V. (ed.). 2015. The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stibbe, A. 2012. Animals Erased: Discourse, Ecology, and Reconnection with the
Natural World. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stibbe, A. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live
By. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stockwell, P. & Whiteley, S. (eds). 2014. The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stubbs, M. 2005. Conrad in the computer: Examples of quantitative
stylistics methods. Language and Literature 14(1): 5–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Virdis, D. F. 2015. Hybrid animals and hybridizing representational
strategies in R. Bach’s Jonathan Livingston
Seagull: A functional grammatical
investigation. In Tiere – Texte – Transformationen: Kritische Perspektiven der
Human-Animal Studies, R. Spannring, R. Heuberger, G. Kompatscher, A. Oberprantacher, K. Schachinger & A. Boucabeille (eds), 213–226. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Federici, Annalisa
2024.
Transitivity and agency in Richard Jefferies’s rural essays: an ecostylistic analysis.
Journal of Literary Semantics 53:1
► pp. 67 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Turci, Monica
2022.
Daniela Francesca Virdis: Ecological stylistics: Ecostylistic approaches to discourses of nature, the environment and sustainability
.
Journal of World Languages 8:3
► pp. 645 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Vermeulen, Karolien
2022.
Growing the green city: A cognitive ecostylistic analysis of Third Isaiah’s Jerusalem (Isaiah 55–66).
Journal of World Languages 8:3
► pp. 567 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.