Part of
Transformative Reading
Olivia Fialho
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 42] 2024
► pp. 225245
Abbott, H. P.
2002The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ABTE
2003Report by the Associação Brasileira de Tecnologia Educacional [Report by the Brazilian Association of Educational Technology]. 〈[URL] and [URL]〉 (25 November 2009)
2004Report by the Associação Brasileira de Tecnologia Educacional [Report by the Brazilian Association of Educational Technology]. [URL]; [URL] (25 November 2009)
Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K.
1984Cluster Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andringa, E.
1990Verbal data on literary understanding: A proposal for protocol analysis on two levels. Poetics 19: 231–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arbib, M. A., Billard, A., Iacoboni, M., & Oztop, E.
2000Synthetic brain imaging: Grasping, mirror neurons and imitation. Neural Networks 13: 975–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, D., & Culpeper, J.
Aristotle
1984Poetics. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, J. Barnes (ed.), Vol. II. Princeton: Bollingen Series LXXI.2, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, P.
2013How Literature Plays with the Brain: The Neuroscience of Reading and Art. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arzouan, Y., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M.
2007‘Brain Waves are Stethoscopes’: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research 1160: 69–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atwood, M.
1995Me, She, and It. In Who’s Writing This? Notations on the Authorial I with Self-Portraits, D. Halpern (ed.), 16–18. Hogewell: Ecco Press.Google Scholar
Auracher, J.
2006Biological Correlates of Suspense: an Empirical Investigation. 10th IGEL Conference (International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature and Media) (pp.5–9 Aug.). Chiemsee, Germany: Conference Presentation.Google Scholar
Aurell, C. G.
1989Man’s triune conscious mind. Perceptual and Motor Skills 68(3): 747–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bachmann, T.
2000Microgenetic Approach to the Conscious Mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, K. D.
1975Cluster analysis. In Sociological Methodology, D. R. Heise (ed.), 59–128. San Francisco: Jossey-Bas. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage University Papers Series Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R.
1977[1968]The death of the author. In Roland Barthes: Image Music Text, S. Heath (trans.), 142–149. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, A., Kalch, A., & Oliver, M. B.
2014Moved to think: The role of emotional media experiences in stimulating reflective thoughts. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 26(3): 125–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, H.
1940Constructive typology in the social sciences. In Contemporary Social Theory, H. E. Barnes, H. Becker & F. B. Becker (eds.). New York: D. Appleton Century.Google Scholar
Beckner, M.
1959The Biological Way of Thought. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ben-Ze’ev, A.
2000The Subtlety of Emotions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B. K., & Chang, N. C.
2005Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In M. Fried & J. Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive and Cross-Language Dimensions, 147–190. [Constructional Approaches to Language 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergsma, A.
2008Do self-help books help?. Journal of Happiness Study 9: 341–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlina, A.
2016Viktor Shklovsky: A Reader. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Blair, H.
1762[2005]Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, L. Ferreira-Buckley & M. S. Halloran (eds.). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P.
2003Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literary Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowen, E.
1956A living writer. Cornhill Magazine, 169: 120–34.Google Scholar
Bridgman, R.
1966The Colloquial Style in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A.
2009When You and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 20(1): 27–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, M., Fialho, O., & Zyngier, S.
(eds.) 2016Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments. [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 24]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, M., & Troscianko, E. T.
2017Cognitive Literary Science: Dialogues Between Literature and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, C.
1985Systemic Linguistics: Theory and Applications. London: Batsford Academic and Educational.Google Scholar
Caracciolo, M., Guédon, C., Kukkonen, K., & Müller, S.
2017The promise of an embodied narratology: Integrating cognition, representation and interpretation. In Emerging Vectors of Narratology. P. K. Hansen, J. Pier, P. Roussin, & W. Schmid (eds.), 435–459. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caracciolo, M., & Van Duuren, T.
2015Changed by literature? A critical review of psychological research on the effects of reading fiction. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, 17(4): 517–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R.
1963The philosopher replies. In The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, P. A. Schilpp (ed.), 859–1013. Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
Carter, R.
1999Common language: Corpus, creativity and cognition. Language and Literature, 8(3): 195–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, R., & McRae, J.
1996Language, Literature and the Learner: Creative Classroom Practice. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Carter, R., & Nash, W.
1990Seeing through Language: A Guide to Styles of English Writing. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carvalho, M. M.
2001Ler por prazer/ler por estudo: Uma dicotomia viável? In Conhecimento e Imaginação: Coletânia dos Trabalhos do I ECEL, S. Zyngier, P. Pinheiro, & R. Figueiredo (eds.), 150–166. Rio de Janeiro: Serviço de Publicações Faculdade de Letras da UFRJ.Google Scholar
Chace, W. M.
2009The decline of the English department: How it happened and what could be done to reverse it. American Scholar, 78(4), 〈[URL]
Channell, J.
1994Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coady, R. J., & Johannessen, J.
2006The Book that Changed my Life: 71 Remarkable Writers Celebrate the Books that Matter Most to Them. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar
Cohen, T.
1999Identifying with metaphor: Metaphors of personal identification. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57: 399–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleridge, S. T.
1817[1907]Biographia Literaria, E. J. Shawcross (ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collini, S.
2013Introduction. In The Two Cultures, C. Snow. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connell, L., & Lynott, D.
2011Modality switching costs emerge in concept creation as well as retrieval. Cognitive Science 35: 763–778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, G.
1994Discourse and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. K., & Sawaf, A.
2003Emotional Intelligence in Leadership. Istanbul, Turkey: Sistem Press.Google Scholar
Copeland, R.
2021Emotion and the History of Rhetoric in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corson, H.
1896The Voice and Spiritual Education. New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D.
1964The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence. New York: WiIey.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M.
1990Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Cuijpers, P.
1997Bibliotherapy in unipolar depression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experiential Psychiatry 28: 139–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culler, J.
1975Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London: Routledge & K. Paul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J.
Cupchik, G. C., & László, J.
1994The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action. Cognition & Emotion 8(4): 297–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cupchik, G. C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P.
1998Emotional effects of reading: Excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics: Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media and the Arts 25(6): 363–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daiches, D.
1993Katherine Mansfield and the search for truth. In Critical Essays on Katherine Mansfield, R. B. Nathan (ed.). New York, Maxwell MacMillan International.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R.
1999The Feeling of what Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
2003Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Orlando: Harcourt.Google Scholar
2010Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
de Beaugrande, R.
1985Poetry and the Ordinary Reader: A Study in Literary Response. Empirical Studies in the Arts 3: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Certeau, M.
1984Reading as poaching. In The Practice of Everyday Life, M. de Certeau, & T. S. Rendall, 165–176. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S.
2009Reading in the Brain. New York: Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C.
1991Consciousness Explained. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Dimberg, U., & Petterson, M.
2000Facial reactions to happy and angry facial expressions: Evidence for right hemisphere dominance. Psychophysiology 37(5): 693–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K.
2000Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society 11(1): 86–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C., & Leung, A.
1993Literary processing and interpretation: towards empirical foundations. Poetics 22: 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
dos Anjos, M. J. F. G.
(2024) O Modelo Transformative Reading na Interpretacao de Obras Literarias e na Percepcao de Si e dos Outros: Projeto Artistico Interdisciplinar do 1.o Ciclo – Colegio de Sao Jose – Ramalhao. PhD dissertation, Universidade da Beira Interior.
Dreyfus, H. L.
1972[1992]What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Driver, H. E., & Kroeber, A. L.
1932Quantitative Expression of Cultural Relationships. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eco, U.
1979The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W. V.
1983Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions. Science, NS 221.4616: 1208–1210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J. M.
1997Literature Lost: Social Agendas and the Corruption of The Humanities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. D.
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H.
2008The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(1): 107–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmott, C.
1997Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999Embodied in a constructed world: Narrative processing, knowledge representation, and indirect anaphora. In Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics, K. van Hoek, A. A. Kibrik, & L. Noordman (eds.), 2–27. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 176]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everitt, B., Landau, S., & Leese, M.
2001Cluster Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Felski, R.
2008Uses of Literature. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009After suspicion. Profession 2009: 28–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, M., Weststrate, N., & Petro, A.
2013Stories of wisdom to live by: Developing wisdom in a narrative mode. In Scientific Study of Personal Wisdom: From Contemplative Traditions to Neuroscience, M. Ferrari & N. M. Weststrate (eds.), 137–164. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Fialho, O.
2002A influência do professor e do monitor no processo de conscientização literária. In Fatos e Ficções – Estudos Empíricos De Literatura, S. Zyngier & A. C. Valente (eds.), 163–177. Rio de Janeiro: Serviço de Publicações da Faculdade de Letras da UFRJ.Google Scholar
2005Pelos Caminhos Da Leitura: Estudo Empírico Sobre Refamiliarização e Afeto [Through the Paths of Reading: An Empirical Study of Refamiliarization and Affect]. M.A. Thesis, UFRJ, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
2007Foregrounding and refamiliarization: Understanding readers’ response to literary texts. Special issue on Foregrounding. Language & Literature 16(2): 105–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Self-Modifying Experiences in Literary Reading: A Model for Reader Response. PhD Dissertation, University of Alberta. 〈[URL]
2016Transformative reading experiences: A descriptive phenomenological study. Summary paper submitted to the IGEL Conference, Chicago, USA, July 6-9, 2016.
2017Transformative reading: Literary experience and the awareness of empathy in fiction and in life. Paper presented at the Conference on Literacy, Empathy and Social Sustainability. Halmstad University, Sweden, 7 September 2017.
2018Deepening readers’ perceptions of self and others: The role of enactment-imagery, resonance, and sympathy. Paper presented at the IGEL Conference, Stavanger, Norway, July 27, 2018.
2019What is literature for? The role of transformative reading. Cogent Arts and Humanities. Special Issue on The Place of the Cognitive in Literary Studies. Ed. Karin Kukkonen, Anežka Kuzmičová, Steen Ledet Christiansen, Merja Polvinen 6(1): 1692532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fialho, O., & van Zundert, J.
(2023) Reconceptualizing Processes in Transformative Reading. Paper presented at IGEL 2023, Monopoli, Italy, 28–30 September, 2023.
Fialho, O. & Hoeken, H.
in prep.). Transformative reading: An empirical model.
Fialho, O., & Zyngier, S.
2003Reading preferences: A comparative study. In Pontes & Transgressões: Estudos Empíricos de Processos Culturais, S. Zyngier, P. Pinheiro & R. Figueiredo (eds.), 56–66. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Fialho, O., Moffat, C., & Miall, D. S.
2010An Empirical Study of Students’ Concepts of Literary Education. IGEL Conference (International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature and Media), (7–11 Jul. 2010). Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Fialho, O., Zyngier, S., & Miall, D. S.
2011aInterpretation and experience: Two pedagogical interventions observed. English in Education 45(3): 236–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011bPedagogische strategieën voor literaire educatie: Een empirische studie. In De Stralende Lezer: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Naar De Invloed Van Het Lezen, F. Hakemulder (ed.), 246–266. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
2012Experiencing or interpreting literature: Wording instructions. In Pedagogical Stylistics: Current Trends in Language, Literature and ELT, M. Burke, S. Csabi, L. Week & J. Zerkowitz (eds.), 58–74. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Field, T. M., Woodson, R., Greenberg, R., & Cohen, D.
1982Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates. Science 218.4568: 179–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R.
1957Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. London and Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A.
2006Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(6): 825–850. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fish, S. E.
1970Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics. New Literary History 2(1): 123–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980Is there a Text in this Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fitts, K., & Lalicker, W. B.
2004Invisible hands: A manifesto to resolve institutional and curricular hierarchy in English studies. College English 66(4): 427–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, J. L., & Zubin, J.
1969On the methods and theory of clustering. Multivariate Behavioral Research 4: 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fogassi, L., & Ferrari, P. F.
2007Mirror neurons and the evolution of embodied language. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(3): 136–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foroni, F., & Semin, G.
2009Language that puts you in touch with your bodily feelings: The multimodal responsiveness of affective expressions. Psychological Science 20(8): 974–980. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M.
1995What is an Author?. In Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern, S. Burke (ed.), 233–46. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Freire, P.
1987 [1970]Pedagogia do Oprimido (33rd edn). Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
1980Conscientização: Teoria e Prática da Libertação. São Paulo: Editora Moraes.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, K.
1986Katherine Mansfield. [Key Women Writers]. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, M.
1995Deictic shift theory and the poetics of involvement in narrative. In Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. E. Hewitt (eds.), 19–59. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S., & Marcel, A. J.
1999The self in contextualized action. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(4): 4–30.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D.
2008The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gallese, V.
2006Intentional attunement: A neurophysiological perspective on social cognition and its disruption in autism. Brain Research 1079: 15–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., & Goldman, A.
1998Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(12): 493–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G.
2005The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22(3–4): 455–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallup Organization
1978Book Reading and Library Usage: A Study of Habits and Perceptions / Conducted for the American Library Association. Princeton, NJ: Gallup Organization.Google Scholar
Gargano, J. W.
1960‘Mansfield’s “Miss Brill”’. The Explicator 19(2, art. n. 10): 25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garvin, P.
(ed.) 1964A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure and Style. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gendlin, E. T.
1978Befindlichkeit: Heidegger and the philosophy of psychology. Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry 16: 1–3.Google Scholar
1997Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning: A Philosophical and Psychological Approach to the Subjective. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J.
1993Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
1994The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2008The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Lima, P., & Francozo, E.
2004Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics 36(7): 1189–1210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J.
1966The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
1979The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S.
1930[1969]James Joyce’s Ulysses. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Giorgi, A.
1985Phenomenology and Psychological Research. Pittsburgh; NJ: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
1992Description versus interpretation: Competing alternative strategies for qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 23(2): 119–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The Descriptive Phenomenological Method in Psychology: A Modified Husserlian Approach. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Gold, J.
1990Read for Your Life: Literature as a Life Support System. Markham, Ont.: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.Google Scholar
Goldie, P.
2000The Emotions: A Philosophical Exporation. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Goleman, D.
1998Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
Goleman, D. P.
1995Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More than IQ for Character, Health and Lifelong achievement. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Gottschall, J.
2008aLiterature, Science, and a New Humanities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008bMeasure for measure. Boston Globe, 11 May 2008, 〈[URL]〉 (5 June 2011).
Gould, S. J.
2011The Hedgehog, the Fox and the Magister’s Pox: Mending the Gap Between Science and the Humanities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Graff, G.
1987Professing Literature: An Institutional History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, M. C.
2004Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal 38(2): 247–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
2000The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(5): 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, S.
2003Introduction. Profession: 7–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gribble, J.
1983Literary Education: A Revaluation. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y., & Friederici, A. D.
2006Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16(2): 240–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosz, E. A.
1995Space, Time, and Perversion: Essays on the Politics of Bodies. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001How to make alle menschen brüder: Literature in a multicultural and multiform society. In Psychology and Sociology of Literature, D. Schram & G. J. Steen (eds.), 225–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Foregrounding and its effects on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes 38(2): 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Imagining what could happen: Effects of taking the role of a character on social cognition. In Directions in Empirical Literary Studies, S. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, A. Chesnokova, & J. Auracher (eds.), 139–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F.
2020Finding meaning through literature: ‘Foregrounding’as an emergent effect. Anglistik 31(1): 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F. & van Peer, W.
2016Empirical stylistics. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, V. Sotirova (ed.), 189–207. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hakemulder, F., Fialho, O., & Bal, M.
2016Learning from literature: Empirical research on readers in schools and at the workplace. In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments, M. Burke, O. Fialho, & S. Zyngier (eds.), 19–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M. M., Tan, E. S., Balint, K., & Doicaru, M. M.
(eds.) 2017Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., Brokerhof Schrijvers, M., Koek, I., & Rijlaarsdam, G.
in prep.). Wat Kan Je Doen Met Literatuur? Zelfinzicht En Mensenkennis Door Lezen En Groepsactiviteiten In Onderwijs En Op De Werkvloer.
Halasz, L., Short, M., & Varga, Á.
2002A cross-cultural study of fictional and non-fictional text understanding. Poetics 30(3): 195–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, G.
2001The poetics of everyday language. CAUCE: Revista de Filología y su Didáctica 24: 69–86.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A.
1970Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6(3): 322–361.Google Scholar
1978Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Languageand Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R.
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hannevik, A.
2001Fra Litteraturhistorie Til Litteraturvitenskap: Allmenn Litteraturvitenskap Ved Universitetet I Oslo: Skisse Av En Faghistorie. Vol. 2/2001 Skriftserie (Forum for Universitetshistorie: Trykt Utg.). Oslo: Forum for Universitetshistorie, Universitetet I Oslo.Google Scholar
Harker, W. J.
1996Toward a defensible psychology of literary interpretation. In Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics, E. R. MacNealy (ed.), 645–658. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hasan, R.
1984The nursery tale as a genre. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 13. [Reprinted in Hasan, R. 1996 Ways of Saying: Ways of Meaning – Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, C. Cloran, D. Butt, & G. Williams (eds.), 51–72. London: Cassell.]Google Scholar
1985Linguistics, Language and Verbal Art. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F.
2004Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Human Brain Mapping 21(3): 191–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermuller, F.
2004Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41(2): 301–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henry, M.
1975Philosophy and Phenomenology of the Body. (T. G. Etzkorn, ed.) The Hague: Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herman, D.
1994Textual “you” and double deixis in Edna O’Brien’s “A Pagan Place”. Style 28(3): 378–410.Google Scholar
2002Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hickok, G.
2014The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition. W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Hoey, M.
1991Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, P. C.
1997Literary universals. Poetics Today 18: 223–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J.
1994What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist 49(6): 493–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, N. N.
19755 Readers Reading. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
2003The willing suspension of disbelief: A neuro-pscychoanalytic view. PsyArt: A Hyperlink Journal for the Psychological Study of the Arts. 22 January 2003, 〈[URL]〉 (19 July 2023).
Huber, M.
2014Towards a New, Dynamic Concept of Health: Its Operationalisation and Use in Public Health and Healthcare, and in Evaluating Health Effects of Food. PhD Dissertation. Maastricht: Maastricht University.
Husserl, E.
1913[1983]Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology (Vol. 1). (F. Kersten, trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
1931[2012]Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Routledge.Google Scholar
1931[1970]Cartesian Meditations. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
1970The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. (T. D. Evanston, ed.) IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
1971[1980]Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Third Book: Phenomenology and the Foundations of the Sciences (Vol. 3). (T. E. Klein, & W. E. Pohl, trans.) The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
1973[1997)]Thing and Space: Lectures of 1907. (T. R. Rojcewicz, ed.) Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
1913[2001]Logical Investigations (from the Second German Edition of Logische Untersuchungen, 1913). (T. J. Moran, ed.) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iacoboni, M.
2005Neural mechanisms of imitation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15: 632–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
IDEB
2011Índice de Desenvolvimento da Educação Básica [Index of the Development of Basic Education]. INEP. [URL] (10 August 2011)
Ingarden, R.
1973The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature. (T. G. Grabowicz, ed.) Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
1989The Ontology of the Work of Art. Ohio: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Iser, W.
1974The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M.
2015Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16(9). 16 April 2015 〈 DOI logo〉 (19 July 2023)Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1960Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language. E. T. Sebeok (ed.), Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
James, H.
1884, Sept.. The art of fiction. Longman’s Magazine 4.Google Scholar
Jandre, J., & Fialho, O.
2005Flow + Foregrounding: A possible relation? In Venturas & Desventuras: Coletânea Dos Trabalhos do V ECEL, S. Zyngier, V. Viana, & F. Fausto (eds.), 87–96. Rio de Janeiro: Setor de Publicações Faculdade de Letras, UFRJ.Google Scholar
Jauss, H. R.
1982Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. (T. Bahti, trans.) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M.
1994The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, 1874244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, L.
2008The role of style in reader-involvement: Deictic shifting in contemporary poems. Journal of Literary Semantics 37(1): 69–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.
2012Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences 52: 150–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jung-Beeman, M.
2005Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(11): 512–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K.
2012Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keen, S.
2007Empathy and the Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
2013Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science 342(6156): 377–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kneepkens, E. W., & Zwaan, R. A.
1994Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics 23: 125–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, E.
2016aReading Suffering: An Empirical Enquiry into Empathic and Reflective Responses to Literary Narratives. PhD Dissertation. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit.
Krijnen, A. F.
2007There Is More (s) in Television: Studying the Relationship between Television and Moral Imagination. PhD Dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. DOI logo
Kuijpers, M. M., & Hakemulder, F.
2018Understanding and appreciating literary texts through rereading. Discourse Processes 55(7): 619–641. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M., & Miall, D. S.
2011Bodily involvement in literary reading: An experimental study of readers’ bodily experiences during reading. In De Stralende Lezer: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Naar De Invloed Van Het Lezen, E. F. Hakemulder (ed.), 160–174. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Kuiken, D.
personal communication). Attitudes Toward Poetry Questionnaire.
Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S.
2001Numerically aided phenomenology: Procedures for investigating categories of experience. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Phenomenological approaches to the temporality of reading experience. Paper presented during the 8th Biannual Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature (IGEL), August 21–24. Pécs, Hungary.
Kuiken, D., & Sikora, S.
1993The impact of dreams on waking thoughts and feelings. In SUNY Series in Dream Studies: The Functions of Dreaming, A. Moffitt, M. Kramer, & R. Hoffman. (eds.), 419–476. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kuiken, D., Campbell, P., & Sopčák, P.
2012The experiencing questionnaire: Locating exceptional reading moments. Scientific Study of Literature 2(2): 243–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Carey, R., & Nielsen, T.
1987Moments of affective insight: Their phenomenon and relations to selected individual differences. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 6: 341–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S.
2004Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today 25(2): 171–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Phillips, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D. S., Verbitsky, M., & Tonkonogy, A.
2004Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading. Discourse Processes 38(2): 267–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Schopflocher, D., & Wild, T. C.
1989Numerically aided methods in phenomenology: A demonstration. Journal of Mind and Behavior 10(4): 373–392.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, K.
20194E Cognition and Eighteenth-Century Fiction: How the Novel Found its Feet. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R.
2007Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research 1146: 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Larsen, S. F., & Seilman, U.
1988Personal meanings while reading literature. Text 8: 411–429.Google Scholar
Lauring, J. O.
2014Literature. In Introduction to Neuroaesthetics: The Neuroscientific Approach to Aesthetic Experience, Artistic Creativity, and Arts Appreciation, S. Martin, & J. O. Lauring (eds.). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S.
1982Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37(9), 1019–1024. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist 39(2): 124–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LeDoux, J. E.
1996The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N.
1969A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lehrer, D., Leschke, J., Ihachimi, S., Vasiliu, A., & Weiffen, B.
2007Negative results in social science. European Political Science 6: 51–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leigh, R. D.
1950The Public Library in the United States: The General Report of the Public Library Inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Link, C. L., & Hopf, H. A.
1946People and Books: A Study of Reading and Book-Buying Habits. New York: Book Industry Committee, Book Manufacturer’s Institute.Google Scholar
Lloyd, B. F., & Gannon, P. M.
2000Personality as the predictor of treatment experiences: A combined focus on relaxation and catharsis. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 19: 39–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lodge, D.
1977The Modes of Modern Writing: Metaphor, Metonymy, and the Typology of Modern Literature. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1978The language of modernist fiction: Metaphor and metonymy. In Modernism, 1890–1930, M. Bradbury & J. W. McFarlane (eds.), 481–496. Hassocks: Harvester.Google Scholar
Long, E.
2003Book Clubs: Women and the Uses of Reading in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Longden, E., Davis, P., Billington, J., Lampropoulou, S., Farrington, G., Magee, F., Walsh, E., & Corcoran, R.
2015Shared reading: Assessing the intrinsic value of a literature-based health intervention. Medical Humanities 41: 113–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louw, W. E.
2008Consolidating Empirical Method in Data-Assisted Stylistics: Towards a Corpus-Attested Glossary of Literary Terms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ltd, B. M.
2000Reading the Situation: Book Reading, Buying and Borrowing Habits in Britain. London: Book Marketing Limited.Google Scholar
Lyons, W. E.
1980Emotion. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, K.
1922Miss Brill. In The Garden-Party and Other Stories, K. Mansfield, 182–189. New York: Alfred J. Knopf Inc.Google Scholar
Mansfield, K., O’Sullivan, V. & Scott, M. S.
1984The Collected Letters of Katherine Mansfield. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mar, R. A.
2011The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology 62(1): 103–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A. & Oatley, K.
2008The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3(3): 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.
2000Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. & Dailey, A.
1995I. A. Richards revisited: Do people agree on their interpretations of literature? Poetics 23: 299–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M. & Carter, R.
1994Language as Discourse: Perspectives for Language Teaching. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
McConkey, K. M. & Nogrady, H.
1986Visual elaboration scale: Analysis of individual and group versions. Journal of Mental Imagery 10: 37–46.Google Scholar
McKinney, J. C.
1966Constructive Typology and Social Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
McRae, J.
1991Literature with a Small “L”. London and Baginstoke: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, K. M.
1977Imitation of facial and manual gestures by Human Neonates. Science 198.4312: 75–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989Imitation in newborn-infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms. Developmental Psychology 25(6): 954–962. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Infants’ understanding of people and things: From body imitation to folk psychology. In The Body and the Self, J. L. Bermúdez, A. Marcel & N. Eilan. Cambridge: MIT/Bradford Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M.
1968The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
1945 [2002]Phenomenology of Perception. (T. C. Smith, ed.) London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metzinger, T.
2003Being No One: The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S.
1988Affect and narrative: A model of response to stories. Poetics 17: 259–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition & Emotion 3(1): 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Empowering the reader: Literary response and classroom learning. Advances in Discourse Processes 52: 463–478.Google Scholar
2006Literary Reading: Empirical & Theoretical Studies. New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
2009Neuroaesthetics of literary reading. In Neuroaesthetics, M. Sko, O. Vartanian, C. Martindale & A. Berleant (eds.), 233–247. Baywood Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
2011aScience in the perspective of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature 1(1): 7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011bA neurophysiological approach to the elements of literariness. In De Stralende Lezer: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Naar De Invloed Van Het Lezen, E. F. Hakemulder (ed.), 148–159. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D.
personal communication). Current Reading Questionnaire.
personal communication). Reading History Questionnaire.
Miall. D. & Kuiken, D.
(1994a) Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response. Discourse Processes 17, 337–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D.
1994bForegrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics 22: 389–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English 29(1): 37–58.Google Scholar
Miall, D. & Kuiken, D.
1999What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes 28(2): 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D.
2001Shifting perspectives: Readers’ feelings and literary response. In New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective, E. W. Chatman (ed.), 289–301. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
2002A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics 30(4): 221–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukařovský, J.
1964Standard Language and Poetic Language. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Mumper, M. L. & Gerrig, R. J.
2017Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 11(1): 109–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NEA
2004Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. National Endowment for the Arts, NEA.Google Scholar
2007To Read or Not to Read: A Question of National Consequence. Washington D.C.: National Endowment for the Arts, NEA.Google Scholar
2009Reading on the Rise: A New Chapter in American Literacy. Washington: National Endowment for the Arts, NEA.Google Scholar
2018U.S. Trends in Arts Attendance and Literary Reading: 2002–2017. National Endowment for the Arts, NEA.Google Scholar
2020How do we Read? Let’s Count the Ways: Comparing Digital, Audio, and Print-Only Readers. Washington D.C.: National Endowment for the Arts, NEA.Google Scholar
Neary, C.
2010Negotiating Narrative Empathy in Gandhi’s Life-Writing. PALA 2010 Conference Proceedings, University of Genoa, Italy.
Nell, V.
1988Lost in a Book: The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K.
2003Narrative and the Emergence of a Consciousness of Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newen, A., De Bruin, L. & Gallagher, S.
2018The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newton, N.
1993The sensorimotor theory of cognition. Pragmatics & Cognition 1(2): 267–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Foundations of Understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M.
2007Embodying Emotion. Science 316.5827: 1002–1005. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishitani, N., & Hari, R.
2000Temporal Dynamics of Cortical Representation for Action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 913–918. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M.
2001Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K.
1992Best Laid Schemes: The Psychology of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1994A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics: Journal for Empirical Research on Literature, the Media and the Arts 23(1–2): 53–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999Why Fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology 3(2): 101–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Emotions: A Brief History. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, M. B. & Bartsch, A.
2011Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications 23(1): 29–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, M. B. & Raney, A. A.
2001Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication 61: 984–1004. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O Globo Online
2008Alunos do ensino fundamental vão mal em matemática e leitura, revela pesquisa da Unesco, 25 June 2008, 〈[URL]〉 (26 November 2009).
Ortony, A.
1991Value and Emotion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Osen, D.
2002The Book that Changed My Life. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, B.
1995Proprioception and the body image. In Self-Consciousness and the Body: An Interdisciplinary Introduction, J. L. Bermudez, A. J. Marcel & N. M. Eilan, (eds.), 175–203. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ostrower, F.
1986Universos Da Arte. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Campus.Google Scholar
Palmer, B., Walls, M., Burgess, Z. & Stough, C.
2001Emotional intelligence and effective leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 22 (1): 5–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panksepp, J.
1998Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pattison, R.
1982On Literacy: The Politics of the Word from Homer to the Age of Rock. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pennac, D.
1992Comme un Roman. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Penne, S.
2013Elevene, litteraturen og lærebøkene i norsk på ungdomstrinnet. In Læreboka: Studier av Ulike Læreboktekster, N. Askeland, E. Maagerø & B. Aamotsbakken (eds.), 35–47. Trondheim: AkademikaGoogle Scholar
Petrucci, A.
1999Ler Por Ler: Um Futuro Para a Leitura I. São Paulo: Ática.Google Scholar
Pisa
2001Relatório Nacional Pisa 2000. Brasília: Inep.Google Scholar
2003Resumo Técnico Pisa 2003. Brasília: Inep.Google Scholar
2010PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and can do: Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Volume I. OECD.Google Scholar
Pisa, I.
2018Relatorio Brasil no Pisa 2018. MEC, Ministerio da Educacao do Brasil. 〈[URL]〉 (25 June 2020).
Plato
1961Dialogues: The Republic. In The Collected Dialogues of Plato, E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (eds.). Electronic Edition. New York, N.Y.: Bollingen Foundation.Google Scholar
Polvinen, M.
2023Self-Reflective Fiction and 4E Cognition: An Enactive Approach to Literary Artifice. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Price, L.
2019What We Talk About When We Talk About Books: The History and Future of Reading. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J.
2004Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pulvermuller, F.
2005Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(7): 576–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
1972A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, P. J.
1987Before Reading: Narrative Conventions and the Politics of Interpretation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rader, C. M. & Tellegen, A.
1987An investigation of synesthesia. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 52(5): 981–987. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radway, J. A.
1984Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
2001On the Socialbility of Reading: Books, Self-fashioning, and the Creation of Communities. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Regel, S., Gunter, T. C. & Friederici, A. D.
2011Isn’t it ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(2): 277–293. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rieger, D., Reinecke, L., Frischlich, L. & Bente, G.
2014Media entertainment and well-being: Linking hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experience to media-induced recovery and vitality. Journal of Communication 64: 456–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riffaterre, M.
1959Criteria for style analysis. Word 15: 154–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. & Arbib, M. A.
2004Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience 21(5): 188–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. & Craighero, L.
2004The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27: 169–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V.
2001Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2(9): 661–670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robertsen, S.
2014Lyst Til å Lese? En Undersøkelse Av Foreningen !les TXt-antologier. Master Thesis. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Robinson, J.
2005Deeper than Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, L. M.
1938[1995]Literature as Exploration. New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
1978The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of The Literary Work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, N.
1995Speaking of Reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Ross, C. S., McKechnie, L. & Rothbauer, P. M.
2006Reading Matters: What the Research Reveals about Reading, Libraries, and Community. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
Rouse, J.
2004Review: After Theory, the Next New Thing. College English 66(4): 452–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruas, M. Trad. Mukarovsky, J.
1932(1981]Linguagem-padrao e linguagem-poetica. In Escritos sobre Estetica e Semiotica da Arte, J. Mukarovsky. Lisboa: Editorial Estampa.Google Scholar
Runeson, S.
1974Constant velocity: Not Perceived as such. Psychological Research 37(1): 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saramago, J.
1999Entre o narrador omnisciente e o monólogo interior: Deveremos voltar ao autor?/ Entre le narrateur omniscient et le monologue interieur: Faut-Il retourner a l’auteur?. In Comparative Literature Now/ La Littérature Comparée L’Heure Actuelle, S. T. Zepetnek, M. V. Dimic & I. Sywenky, 183–193. Paris: Honoré Champion Editeur.Google Scholar
Sartre, J. P.
1956Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Saygin, A. P., McCullough, S., Alac, M. & Emmorey, K.
2010Modulation of BOLD response in motion-sensitive lateral temporal cortex by real and fictive motion sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(11): 2480–2490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, S. J.
1980Grundriß der Empirischen Literaturwissenschaft. 2 vols. Braunschweig: Viewe.Google Scholar
Scholes, R. E.
1998The Rise and Fall of English: Reconstructing English as a Discipline. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, M.
2019The Story, The Self, The Other: Developing Insight Into Human Nature in the Literature Classroom. PhD Dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O. & Rijlaarsdam, G.
2016The impact of literature education on students’perceptions of self and others: Exploring personal and social learning experiences in relation to teacher approach. Contribution to a special issue The role of writing in literature education, T. Janssen & I. Pieper (eds.) L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature 16, 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019aGaining insight into human nature: A review of literature classroom intervention studies. Review of Educational Research 89(1): 3–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019bToward the validation of a literature classroom intervention to foster adolescents’ insights into human nature: An iterative design process. Contribution to the special issue Systematically designed literature classroom interventions: Design principles, development and implementation, M. Schrijvers, K. Murphy & G. Rijlaarsdam (eds.). L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., De Maeyer, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G.
2019cTransformative dialogic literature teaching fosters adolescents’ insight into human nature. Learning and Instruction 63, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulkind, J.
1976Moments of Being: Unpublished Autobiographical Writings. Virginia Woolf. London: Chatto and Windus for Sussex University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, M.
1999WordSmith Tools. Version 3. 〈[URL]
Seilman, U. & Larsen, S. F.
1989Personal resonance to literature: A study of remindings while reading. Poetics 18, 165–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šklovsky, V.
1917[1965]Art as technique. In Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (trans.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Short, M.
1996Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays, and Prose. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Siemens, D.
2010Numerically Aided Phenomenology: Methodological Developments in an Empirical Investigation of Reader Response. Paper completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the course Psychology 498: University of Alberta.
Sikora, S., Kuiken, D. & Miall, D. S.
(26–29 Aug 1998) Enactment Versus Interpretation: A Phenomenological Study of Readers’ Responses to Coleridge’s ‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’. Sixth Biannual Conference of the IGEL (International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature). Utrecht: Conference presentation.Google Scholar
2011Expressive reading: A phenomenological study of readers’ experience of Coleridge’s the Rime of the Ancient Mariner. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5(3): 258–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P.
1993Language, Ideology and Point of View. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Stylistics: A Resource Book For Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
20142nd edition. Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M.
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skjerdingstad, K. I. & Tangerås, T. M.
2019Shared reading as an affordance-nest for developing kinesic engagement with poetry: A case study. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1688631. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slingerland, E. G.
2008What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P. H. & Sokal, R. R.
1973Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman W. H. & Co.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P.
1959 [2001]The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snyders, G.
1999Des Élèves Heureux: Réflexion sur la Joie à l’École à Partir de Quelques Texts Littéraires. L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, R.
2000Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, R.
1976The Passions. Garden City: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
1980Emotions and Choice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sopčák, P.
2007‘Creation from nothing’ – A foregrounding study of James Joyce’s drafts for Ulysses. Language and Literature 16(2): 183–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J., Swallow, K. & Zacks, J.
2009Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences. Psychological Science 20(8): 989–999. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spiegelberg, H. & Schuhmann, K.
1982The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction. Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Steen, G.
1994Understanding Metaphor in Literature: An Empirical Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P.
2002[2020]Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Straus, E.
1966Philosophical Psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Tan, E. S.
1994Film-induced affect as a witness emotion. Poetics 23: 7–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tellegen, A. & Atkinson, G.
1974Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 83(3): 268–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tettamanti, M. E.
2005Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Studies 17: 273–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., Cappa, S. F. & Perani, D.
2005Sentences describing actions activate visuomotor execution and observation systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17: 273–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Oxford English Dictionary
2011 Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. & Hunston, S.
2000Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thue, F. W.
2019Den Historiske Allmenndannelse. Historisk Tidsskrift 2: 167–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todorov, T.
2007La Littérature en Péril. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
2009A Literatura em Perigo. C. Meira (trad.) Rio de Janeiro: Difel.Google Scholar
Toolan, M. J.
2008Verbal Art: Through Repetition to Immersion. Paper presented at the Second International Stylistics Conference. Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China. October 22–25, 2008. Available at: [URL]
2009Narrative Progression in the Short Story: A Corpus Stylistics Approach [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Emotions in Texts: A Corpus Stylistics Study. PALA 2010 Conference. Conference Presentation. (pp.20–25 July). Genoa: University of Genoa.Google Scholar
Toyne, J. & Usherwood, B.
2001Checking the Books: The Value and Impact of Public Library Book Reading. Sheffield: Centre for the Public Library and Information in Society, Department of Information Studies.Google Scholar
Troustine, J. R. & Waxler, R. P.
2005Finding a Voice: The Practice of Changing Lives Through Literature. University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tryon, R. C.
1939Cluster Analysis: Correlation Profile and Orthometric (Factor) Analysis for the Isolation of Unities of the Mind and Personality. Ann Arbor: Edwards Brothers.Google Scholar
Tsur, R.
1992What Makes Sound Patterns Expressive: The Poetic Mode of Speech-Perception. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
2012Playing by Ear and the Tip of the Tongue: Precategorial information in poetry. [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dalen-Oskam, K.
2021Het Raadsel Literatuur: Is Literaire Kwaliteit Meetbaar? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
van Manen, M.
1997Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. London: Althouse Press.Google Scholar
van Peer, W.
1986Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding. London, Sydney, Wolfeboro: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2007Special Issue on Foregrounding. Language and Literature 16(2).Google Scholar
van Peer, W. & Hakemulder, F.
2006Foregrounding. In The Pergamon Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, K. Brown (ed.), Vol. 4: 546–551. Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W., Hakemulder, F. & Zyngier, S.
2012Scientific Methods for the Humanities. [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W., Sopcak, P., Castiglione, D., Fialho, O., Jacobs, A. & Hakemulder, F.
2021Foregrounding. In Handbook of Empirical Literary Studies, D. Kuiken & A. M. Jacobs (eds.), 145–176. Berlin, Boston: DeGruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Schooten, E., Oostdam, R. & de Glopper, K.
2001Dimensions and predictors of literary response. Journal of Literacy Research 33(1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varela, F. J.
1996Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy to the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3: 330–50.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E.
1991The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verdonk, P.
2002Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verissimo, E.
1938/2005Olhai os Lirios dos Campos. Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Vipond, D. & Hunt, R. A.
1984Point-driven understanding: Pragmatic and cognitive dimensions of literary reading. Poetics: International Review for the Theory of Literature 13(3): 261–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voltaire, F.
1759/2006Candide, or Optimism. Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Votteler, T.
1988Short Story Criticism: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Short Fiction Writers, 1988–1992. Detroit, MI: Gale Research.Google Scholar
Wales, K.
2001A Dictionary of Stylistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A., Vuust, P., Dohn, A., Roepstorff, A. & Lund, T.
2011Amygdala and heart rate variability responses from listening to emotionally intense parts of a story. NeuroImage 58(3): 963–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. B.
1924Psychology from the Standpoint of a Behaviorist. Philadelphia and London: J. B. Lippincott. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waxler, R. P. & Troustine, J. R.
1999Changing Lives through Literature. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M.
1949The Methodology of the Social Sciences. E. A. Shils & H. A. Finch (trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M.
2005Reconstructing the Cognitive World: The Next Step. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wild, T. C. & Kuiken, D.
1992Aesthetic attitude and variations in reported experience of a painting. Empirical Studies of the Arts 10: 57–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wild, T. C., Kuiken, D. & Schopflocher, D.
1995The role of absorption in experiential involvement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 69(3): 569–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, J.
2016You Gotta BE the Book: Teaching Engaged and Reflective Reading with Adolescents. 3rd ed.. New York, NY: Teachers College.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. & Beardsley, M. C.
1949The affective fallacy. The Sewanee Review 57(1): 31–55.Google Scholar
Winkielman, P., Niedenthal, P. M. & Oberman, L.
2008The Embodied Emotional Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, E. O.
1974Replacement as a Function of Repetition: A Study of its Principal Features in the Clause Relations of Contemporary English. PhD dissertation, University of London.
1979Replacement as a fundamental function of the sentence in context. Forum Linguisticum 4(2): 95–133.Google Scholar
Wirth, W., Hofer, M. & Schramm, H.
2012Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research 38: 406–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wishart, D.
2000Clustan Graphics Primer. Edinburgh: Clustan Limited.Google Scholar
Wohl, M. J., Kuiken, D. & Noels, K. A.
2006Three ways to forgive: A numerically aided phenomenological study. British Journal of Social Psychology 45: 547–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wootton, A. J.
1975Dilemmas of Discourse: Controversies about the Sociological Interpretation of Language. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, W.
1798[1963]Lines Written a Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey, On Revisiting the Banks of the Wye During a Tour, July 13, 1798. In Lyrical Ballads: The Text of the 1798 edition with the Additional 1800 Poems and the Prefaces, R. L. Brett & A. R. Jones (eds.). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, W. & Coleridge, S. T.
1963Lyrical Ballads: The Text of the 1798 edition with the Additional 1800 Poems and the Prefaces, R. L. Brett & A. R. Jones (eds.) London: Methuen and Co. Ldt.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B.
1980Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 39: 151–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984On the Primacy of Affect. American Psychologist 39(2): 117–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, B.
2011The jargon of the novel, computed. New York Times: Sunday Book Review, 29 July 2011, 〈[URL]〉 (30 July 2011).
Zubin, J.
1938A technique for measuring like-mindedness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 33(4): 508–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A.
1994Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20(4): 920–933.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. & Singer, M.
2003Text Comprehension. In Handbook of Discourse Processes, E. A. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher & S. R. Goldman (eds.), 83–121. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P. & Graesser, A. C.
1995Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21(2): 386–397.Google Scholar
Zyngier, S.
1994aAt the Crosswords of Language and Literature. PhD dissertation. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
1994bIntroducing Literary Awareness. Language Awareness 3(2): 95–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Macbeth through the computer: Literary evaluation and pedagogical implications. In The Quality of Literature: Linguistic Studies in Literary Evaluation, W. van Peer (ed.), 169–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zyngier, S. & Shepherd, T. M.
2003What is literature, really? A corpus-driven study of students’ statements. Style 37(1): 14–26.Google Scholar
Zyngier, S., Fialho, O. & Pinheiro, P.
2007Revisiting Literary Awareness. In Literature and Stylistics for Language Learners: Theory and Practice, G. Watson & S. Zyngier (eds.), 194–209. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar