Whether justified by the “affective fallacy” or the “death of the subject,” challenges to expressivist theories of literary reading have been persuasive. What seems lacking is theory that respects the fragility of felt meanings and the vitality found in their uncovering. Addressing this lack requires articulation of how feeling expression unfolds over time, has the character of disclosure, and simultaneously brings feelings and their intentional objects to presence. Without detracting from expressive disclosure, it is also critical to acknowledge the limits of expressibility – and that expressive reading gestures toward the mood of that which cannot be brought to presence.
2010. An Uncommon Resonance: The Influence of Loss on Expressive Reading. Empirical Studies of the Arts 28:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
Gavins, Joanna
2009. The year’s work in stylistics 2008. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 18:4 ► pp. 367 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.