Cover not available
Part of
Specific Language Impairment: Current trends in research
Edited by Stavroula Stavrakaki
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 58] 2015
► pp. 215–252

Specific Language Impairment in German Children

The article provides an overview of linguistic research on SLI in German, concentrating on linguistic markers and accounts of the underlying deficit. It focuses on verbal morpho-syntax and verb placement, characteristic difficulties in German SLI. It argues, however, that the difficulties also concern areas of syntax and semantics such as Wh-questions in accordance with cross-linguistic findings. These broader difficulties point to problems with complex linguistic computations in general – in syntax and semantics – rather than a specific mechanism. Additionally, the article describes deviant development in the acquisition of the lexicon and German verb semantics arguing that specific linguistic properties can reveal deep properties of the syndrome. Finally, new research directions for the identification of cross-linguistic markers of SLI are explored.
Published online: 11 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.58.10ham
References (135)
References
Bühring, D. 1995. The 59th Bridge Accent: The Meaning of Focus and Topic. PhD dissertation, University of Köln.
Burns, F., de Villiers, P., Zurer Pearson, B. & Champion, T. 2012. Dialect-neutral indices of narrative cohesion and evaluation. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 43: 132–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilla, S. 2008. Erstsprache, Zweitsprache, Spezifische Sprach-entwicklungsstörung? Eine Untersuchung des Erwerbs der deutschen Hauptsatzstruktur durch sukzessiv-bilinguale Kinder mit türkischer Erstsprache. Hamburg: Kovac.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1984. Der Erwerb der Kasusmarkierungen in der deutschen Kindersprache. Linguistische Berichte 89: 1–31.Google Scholar
. 1986. Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics 24: 79–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Kritische Phasen der Grammatikentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 7: 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. The grammatical characterization of developmental dysphasia. Linguistics 27: 897–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991a. Child Language and Developmental Dysphasia. Linguistic Studies of the Acquisition of German [Studies in Speech Pathology and Clinical Linguistics 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991b. Constraints on parameter setting. Language Acquisition 1: 361–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Linguistic perspectives on Specific Language Impairment. In Handbook of Child Language Acquisition, T. Bhatia & W. Ritchie (eds), 675–704. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Bartke, S. & Göllner, S. 1997. Formal features in impaired grammars: A comparison of English and German SLI children. Journal of Neurolinguistics 10: 151–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. & Dalakakis, J. 1999. Tense and agreement in Greek SLI: A case study. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 24: 1–25.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S. & Penke, M. 1996. Lexical learning and early development. In Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 14], H. Clahsen (ed.), 129–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Kursawe, C. & Penke, M. 1996. Introducing CP: Wh-questions and subordinate clauses in German child language. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 7: 1–28.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. & Penke, M. 1992. The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone corpus. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement, J. Meisel (ed.), 181–224. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A. & Marcus, G. 1992. Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition 45: 225–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collings, A. 1989. Zum Kasuserwerb beim Dysgrammatismus. Ms, University of Düsseldorf.
Collings, A., Puschmann, B. & Rothweiler, M. 1989. Dygrammatismus – Ein Defizit der grammatischen Kongruenz. Neurolinguistik 2 127–143.Google Scholar
Délage, H., Monjauze, C., Hamann, C. & Tuller, L. 2008. Relative clauses in atypical acquisition of French. In Language Acquisition and Development, Proceedings of GALA 2007, A. Gavarró & M.J. Freitas (eds), 166–176. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
De Jong, J. 2003. Specific Language Impairment and linguistic explanation. In Language Competence Across Populations, Y. Levy & J. Schaeffer (eds), 151–170. Mahwah NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J., Roeper, T., Bland-Stewart, L. & Pearson, B. 2008. Answering hard questions: Wh-movement across dialects and disorder. Applied Psycholinguistics 29: 67–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S. 2003. Merkmalsgesteuerter Grammatikerwerb. PhD dissertation, University of Düsseldorf.
Eisenbeiss, S., Bartke, S. & Clahsen, H. 2006. Structural and lexical case in child German: Evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children. Language Acquisition 13: 3–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fisher, C., Gleitman, L. & Gleitman, H. 1991. On the semantic content of subcategorization frames. Cognitive Psychology 23: 331–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Franck, J., Lassi, G., Frauenfelder, U.H. & Rizzi, L. 2006. Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction. Cognition 101(1): 173–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A’-dependencies. Lingua 119: 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gall, F. 1835. The Function of the Brain and Each of Its Parts, 5: Organology. Boston MA: Marsh, Capen & Lyon.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. & Baddeley, A. 1993. Working Memory and Language. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum G. & Sag, I. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, M. 1990. Feature-blind grammar and dysphasia. Nature 344, 715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grillo, A. 2008. Generalized Minimality: Syntactic Underspecification in Broca’s Aphasia. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht, LOT.
Grimm, H. 1983. Kognitions- und interaktionspsychologische Aspekte der Entwicklungsdysphasie. Sprache und Kognition 3: 169–186.Google Scholar
. 1993. Syntax and morphological difficulties in German-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment: Implications for diagnosis and intervention. In Language Acquisition Problems and Reading Disorders: Aspects of Diagnosis and Intervention, H. Grimm & H. Skowronek (eds), 25–63. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimm, H. & Weinert, S. 1990. Is the syntax development of dysphasic children deviant and why? New findings to an old question. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33: 220–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegemann, L. 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haffner, U. 1995. Gut reden kann ich. Dortmund: Verlag Modernes Lernen.Google Scholar
Haider, H. 1985. The case of German. In Studies in German Grammar, J. Toman (ed.). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hamann, C. 1996. Null arguments in German child language. Language Acquisition 5: 155–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. The acquisition of constituent questions and the requirements of interpretation. In The Acquisition of Syntax, M.-A. Friedemann & L. Rizzi (eds), 170–201. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2002. From Syntax to Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Speculations about early syntax: The production of wh-questions by normally developing French children and French children with SLI. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 5: 143–189.Google Scholar
. 2012. Bilingual development and language assessment. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A.K. Biller, E.Y. Chung & A.E. Kimball (eds), 1–28. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hamann, C., Lindner, K. & Penner, Z. 2001. Tense, reference time and language impairment in German children. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae, C. Fery & W. Sternefeld (eds), 182–213. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Hamann, C., Penner, Z. & Lindner, K. 1998. German impaired grammar: The clause structure revisited. Language Acquisition 7: 193–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C., Tuller, L., Monjauze, C., Délage, H. & Henry, C. 2007. (Un)successful subordination in French-speaking children and adolescents with SLI. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, H. Gaunt-Nutton, S. Kulatilake & I. Woo, (eds), 286–297. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. 1973. Questions in the Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53.Google Scholar
Hansen, D. 1994. Zur Wirksamkeit und Effizienz einer psycholinguistisch begründeten Methode der Sprachtherapie bei kindlichem Dysgrammatismus. Sprache-Stimme-Gehör 18: 25–33.Google Scholar
Holtz, A. 1988. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der Pluralmorphologie bei sprachbehinderten Kindern. Ulm: Ulmer Publikationen zur Sprachbehindertenpädagogik.Google Scholar
Ingham, R., Fletcher, P., Schelletter, C. & Sinka, I. 1998. Resultative VPs and specific language impairment. Language Acquisition 7: 87–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C. 2004. Question formation in French SLI: Is movement costly? Paper presented at Groningen Workshop on the L1 Acquisition of Tense, Aspect and Questions. June 11, 2004, University of Groningen.
Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C. & Gérard, C.L. 1998. Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition 7: 113–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenbacher, E. & Lindner, K. 1990. Some aspects of delayed and deviant development in language-impaired children learning German. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Group for Child Language Disorders, Roros, Norway.
Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kegel, G. & Günther, H. (eds). 1981. Psycholinguistische Untersuchungen zum kindlichen Agrammatismus. München: Institut für Phonetische und Sprachliche Kommunikation.Google Scholar
Kerschensteiner, M. & Huber, W. 1975. Grammatical impairment in developmental aphasia. Cortex 11: 264–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koster, J. 1975. Dutch as an SOV language. Linguistic Analysis 1: 111–36.Google Scholar
Kroffke, S. & Rothweiler, M. 2006. Variation im frühen Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen durch Kinder mit türkischer Erstsprache. In Variation in Sprachtheorie und Spracherwerb. Akten des 39. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Amsterdam 2004, M. Vliegen (ed.), 145–153. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. 1998. Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Ellis Weismer, S., Miller, C.A., Francis, D., Tomblin, J.B. & Kail, R. 2007. Speed of processing, working memory and language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50: 408–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liebmann, A. 1901. Agrammatismus Infantilis. Archiv für Psychatrie und Nervenkrankheiten 34: 240–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindner, K., Stoll, S. & Täubner, K. 1994. Aktionsarten and verb inflection in German: A comparison of normal children with children with SLI. Paper presented at the Meeting for the European Group for Child Language Disorders, Garderen, The Netherlands.
Markmann, E. 1994. Constraints on word meaning in early language acquisition. In The Acquisition of the Lexicon, L. Gleitman & B. Landau (eds), 199–227. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. (ed.) 1992. The Acquisition of Verb Placement. Dortrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menyuk, P. 1975. Children with language problems: What’s the problem? In Georgetown Roundtable on Language and Linguistics, D. Dato (ed.), 129–144. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. 1978. Linguistic problems in children with developmental dyphasia. In Developmental dysphasia, M. Wyke (ed.), 138–158. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Miller, M. 1979. The Logic of Language Development in Early Childhood. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, A. 1985. The acquisition of German. In The Cross-linguistic Study of Language Acquisition 1, D. Slobin (ed.), 141–254. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J., Beula, W., Magimairaj, M. & Finney, M.C. 2010. Working memory and Specific Language Impairment: An update on the relation and perspectives on assessment and treatment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 19: 78–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, G. & Sternefeld, W. 1993. Improper movement and unambiguous binding. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 461–507.Google Scholar
Naigles, L. 1990. Children use syntax to learn verb meaning. Journal of Child Language 15: 257–272.Google Scholar
Novogrodsky, R. & Friedmann, N. 2006. The production of relative clauses in SLI: A window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech Language Pathology 8: 364–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oetting, J.B., Rice, M. & Swank, L. 1995. Quick incidental learning (QUIL) of words by school-age children with and without SLI. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38: 434–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owen, A. & Leonard, L. 2006. The Production of Finite and Nonfinite Complement Clauses by Children With Specific Language Impairment and Their Typically Developing Peers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49: 548–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. 2010. The Interface between Bilingual Development and Specific Langauge Impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 31: 227–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. & Crago, M. 2001. The morphosyntax of specific language impairment in French: Evidence for an extended optional default account. Language Acquisition 9: 269–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penner, Z. 1990. On the acquisition of verb-placement and verb projection raising in Bernese Swiss German. In Spracherwerb und Grammatik. Linguistische Untersuchungen zum Erwerb von Syntax und Morphologie [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 3], M. Rothweiler (ed.), 166–189. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Penner, Z., Wymann, K. & Schulz, P. 1999. Specific Language Impariment revisited: parallelism vs. deviance: a learning theoretical approach. In Normal and Impaired Language Acquistion. Studies in Lexical, Syntactic And Phonological Development [Arbeitspapier 105], Z. Penner, P. Schulz & K. Wymann (eds), 1–26. Konstanz: Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Penner, Z., Schoenenberger, M. & Weissenborn, J. 1994. The acquisition of object placement in early German and Swiss German. Linguistics in Potsdam 1: 93–108.Google Scholar
Penner, Z., Schulz, P. & Wymann, K. 2003. Learning the meaning of verbs: What distinguishes language impaired from normally developing children? Linguistics 41(2): 289–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. 1994. How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics. In Lingua 92: 377–410. Special issue on Lexical Acquisition, L. Gleitman & B. Landau (eds). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. & Wexler, K. 1993. The Full Competence Hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. & Tuller, L. Submitted. Complexity and production/comprehension asymmetries in the acquisition of wh-questions in French: Comparing second language acquisition and language impairment in children.
Pustojevsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reis, M. & Rosengren, I. 1991. What do imperatives tell us about wh-movement? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 97–118.Google Scholar
Rice, M., Hoffman, L. & Wexler, K. 2009. Judgments of omitted Be and Do in questions as extended finiteness clinical markers of Specific Language Impairment to 15 years: A study of growth and asymptote. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 52: 1417–1433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, M., Oetting, J., Marquis, J., Bode, J. & Pae, S. 1994. Frequency of input effects on word comprehension of children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37: 106–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, M., Ruff Noll, K. & Grimm, H. 1997. An extended optional infinitive stage in German-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment. Language Acquisition 6: 255–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. & Wexler, K. 1996. Toward tense as a clinical marker of Specific Language Impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 39: 850–863. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1990. Speculations on verb second. In Grammar in Progress, J. Mascaro & M. Nespor (eds), 375–386. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3: 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the Left Periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook of Generative Syntax, L. Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and Left Periphery. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, A. Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. 1995. Functional Categories in the Grammars of English- and German-speaking Children with Specific Language Impairment. MA thesis, Perdue University.
Roeper, T. 1996. The role of merger theory and formal features in acquisition. In Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 14], H. Clahsen (ed.), 415–450. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roeper, T., & de Villiers, J. 1991. The emergence of bound variable structures. In Papers on the Acquisition of Wh. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers, Maxfeld, T. & B. Plunkett (eds). Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Rothweiler, M. 1999. Neue Ergebnisse zum fast mapping bei sprachnormalen und sprachentwicklungsgestörten Kindern. In Das Lexikon im Spracherwerb, J. Meibauer & M. Rothweiler (eds), 252–277. Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2006. The acquisition of V2 and of subordinate clauses in early successive acquisition of German. In Interfaces in Multilingualism [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 4], Conxita Lleo (ed.), 91–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothweiler, M., Chilla, S. & Clahsen, H. 2012. Subject verb agreement in specific language impairment: A study of monolingual and bilingual German-speaking children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15: 39–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothweiler, M. & Clahsen, H. 1993. Dissociations in SLI children’s inflectional systems: A study of participle inflection and subject-verb-agreement. Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 18: 169–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schöler, H. & Kany, W. 1989. Lernprozesse beim Erwerb von Flexionsmorphemen: Ein Vergleich sprachbehinderter mit sprach-unauffälligen Kindern am Beispiel der Pluralmarkierung. In Sprachwissenschaft und Psycholinguistik 3, G. Kegel (ed.), 123–175. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schönenberger, M., Rothweiler, M. & Sterner, F. 2012. Case marking in child L1 and early child L2 German. In Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies, K. Braunmüller & C. Gabriel (eds) [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütze, C. 1997. Infl in Child and Adult Language: Agreement, Case and Licensing. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Schütze, C. & Wexler, K. 1996. Subject case licencing and English root infinitives. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes & A. Zukowsky (eds), 670–681. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schulz, P. & Roeper, T. 2011. Acquisition of exhaustivity in wh-questions: A semantic dimension of SLI? Lingua 121: 383–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, P., Wymann, K. & Penner, Z. 2001. The early acquisition of verb meaning in German by normally developing and language impaired children. Brain and Language 77: 407–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seymoure, H.N., Roeper, T. & de Villiers, J. 2005. Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation (DELV). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Stavrakaki, S. 2006. Developmental Perspectives on Specific Language Impairment: Evidence from the Production of Wh-questions by Greek SLI Children over Time. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 8(4): 384–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., Vogindroukas, I., Chelas, E. & Ghousi, S. 2008. Subject- verb agreement in SLI and child L2: A comparative approach to Greek SLI and (un)impaired child L2. In Language Acquisition and Development, Proceedings of GALA 2007, A. Gavarró & M.J. Freitas (eds), 413–423. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Stechow, A. & Sternefeld, W. 1988. Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Ein Lehrbuch der generativen Grammatik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. & Mastropavlou, M. 2007. Feature interpretability in L2 acquisition and SLI: Greek clitics and determiners. In The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. Licaeras, H. Zoble & H. Goodluck (eds), 142–183. Mahwah NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tuller, L., Henry, C., Sizaret E. & Barthez, M.-A. 2012. SLI at adolescence: Avoiding complexity. Applied Psycholinguistics 33: 161–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uchermann, V.C. 1891. Drei Fälle von Stummheit (Aphasie) ohne Taubheit, Lähmung oder Geistesschwäche. Sowie ein durch Schreck verursachter Fall von Taubstummheit, ein Fall von verschwindender angeborner Taubstummheit und ein Fall von Stummheit durch Zungenparalysis. Wiesbaden: J.F. BergmannGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, M.T. & Pierpoint, E.I. 2005. Specific Language Impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex 41: 399–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H.K.J. 1994. Canonical linking rules: Forward vs. reverse linking in normally and specifically language impaired children. Cognition 51: 29–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. SLI in children: Movement, economy, and deficits in the computational-syntactic system. Language Acquisition 7: 161–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Grammatical-SLI and the computational grammatical complexity hypothesis. Revue Frequences 17(3): 13–20.Google Scholar
van der Lely, H.K.J. & Marshall, C. 2011. Grammatical-Specific Language Impairment: A window onto domain specificity. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics & Cognitive Processing Perspectives in Communication Disorders, J. Guendouzi, F. Loncke & M. Williams (eds), 401–418. New York NY: LEA Taylor & Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H.K.J. & Stollwerck, L. 1997. Binding theory and specifically language impaired children. Cognition 62: 245–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Hout, A. 1996. Event Semantics of Verb Frame Alternation. A case Study of Dutch and its Acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Tilburg.
Veit, S. 1986. Das Verständnis von Plural- und Komparativformen bei (entwicklungs)dysgrammatischen Kindern im Vorschulalter. In Sprachwissenschaft und Psycholinguistik 3, G. Kegel (ed.), 217–286. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, H. 1990. Der Dativ – ein struktureller Kasus? In Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien, G. Fanselow & S. Felix (eds), 70–103. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Weissenborn, J. 1990. Functional categories and verb movement: The acquisition of German syntax reconsidered. In Spracherwerb und Grammatik. Linguistische Untersuchungen zum Erwerb von Syntax Und Morphologie [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 3], M. Rothweiler (ed.). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Null subjects in early grammars. In Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition, J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck & T. Roeper (eds). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. 1994. Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations in child grammar. In Verb Movement, N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (eds), 305–350. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the Optional Infinitive stage. Lingua 106: 23–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K., Schütze, C. & Rice, M. 1998. Subject Case in children with SLI and unaffected controls: Evidence for the Agr/Tns Omission Model. Language Acquisition 7: 317–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittek, A. 1999. …and the Prince Woke the Sleeping Beauty Again. Learning the Meaning of Change-of-state Verbs: A Case Study in German. PhD dissertation, MPI Nijmegen/University of Tübingen.
Wittek, A. & Tomasello, M. 2005. German-speaking children’s productivity with syntactic constructions and case morphology: local cues act locally. First Language 25: 103–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wojtecka, M. & Schulz, P. 2011. Exhaustive wh-questions in eL2TD and SLI children. Paper presented at the Eskisehir Cost meeting, 2011.
Wunderlich, D. 1997. Cause and the structure of verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 27–68.Google Scholar
Zeller, J. 1994. Die Syntax des Tempus. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, C.J.W. 1993. Dutch Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Franck, Julie & Hélène Delage
2022. The Interplay of Emotions, Executive Functions, Memory and Language: Challenges for Refugee Children. Languages 7:4 ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Stegenwallner-Schütz, Maja & Flavia Adani
2021. Number Dissimilarity Effects in Object-Initial Sentence Comprehension by German-Speaking Children With Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 64:3 ► pp. 870 ff. DOI logo
Rakhlin, Natalia V., Nan Li, Abdullah Aljughaiman & Elena L. Grigorenko
2020. Narrative Language Markers of Arabic Language Development and Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 63:10 ► pp. 3472 ff. DOI logo
Schulz, Petra
2018. Chapter 6. Telicity in typical and impaired acquisition. In Semantics in Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 24], ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Hamann, Cornelia & Lina Abed Ibrahim
2017. Methods for Identifying Specific Language Impairment in Bilingual Populations in Germany. Frontiers in Communication 2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.