Despite the general transparency of standard Turkish orthography, it fails to distinguish the (not fully predictable) contrast between coronal vs. dorsal laterals following back vowels in certain loanwords: the laterals in /koɫ/ <kol> and
/rol/ <rol> are both represented as <l>. This contrast results in non-canonical vowel harmony, where the backness of a suffix vowel is determined by the lateral, rather than by the preceding vowel (e.g. /koɫ-a/ <kola>, but /rol-e/ <role>). While early English-Turkish learners performed at a significantly higher level of accuracy on selecting the target suffix vowel in these contexts with auditory-only presentation of the stimulus than with auditory and written presentation, intermediate and advanced learners come to rely more on auditory stimuli and less on orthography.
Bassetti, B. 2009. Orthographic input and second language phonology. In Input Matters in SLA, T. Piske, P. Thorsten & M. Young-Scholten (eds), 191–206. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Bley-Vroman, R. 1990. The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis 20: 3–48.
Clements, G.N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2: 225–252.
Clements, G.N. & Hume, E.V. 1995. In The Internal Organization of Speech Sounds, J.A. Goldsmith (ed), 245–306. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Clements, G.N. & Sezer, E. 1982. Vowel and consonant disharmony in Turkish. In The Structure of Phonological Representations, H. van der Hults & N. Smith (eds), 213–255. Dordrecht: Foris.
Demircan, Ö. 1996. Türkçenin Sesdizimi. Istanbul: Der Yayınevi.
Erdener, V.D. & Burnham, D.K. 2005. The role of audiovisual speech and orthographic information in nonnative speech production. Language Learning 55: 191–228.
Escudero, P. & Wanrooij, K. 2010. The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception. Language and Speech 53: 343–365.
Felix, S. 1985. More evidence on competing cognitive systems. Second Language Research 1: 47–92.
Fromkin, V., Hayes, B., Curtiss, S., Szabolcsi, A., Stowell, T., Stabler, E., Sportiche, D., Koopman, H., Keating, P., Munro, P., Hyams, N. & Steriade, D. 2000. Linguistics: An Introduction to Linguistic Theory. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Hayes, B. 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hayes-Harb, R., Nicol, J. & Barker, J. 2010. Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech 53: 367–381.
Hyman, L.M. 2014. How autosegmental is phonology?The Linguistic Review 31: 363–400.
Kabak, B. 2011. Turkish vowel harmony. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds), 2831–2854. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kornfilt, J. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.
Krashen, S.D. 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Levi, S.V. 2001. Glides, laterals and Turkish vowel harmony.
Papers from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society
37: 379–393.
Montrul, S. 1997. Transitivity Alternations in Second Language Acquisition: A Crosslinguistic Study of English, Spanish and Turkish. PhD dissertation, McGill University.
Nevins, A. 2010. Locality in Vowel Harmony [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 55]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Oxley, J., Buckingham, H., Roussel, N. & Daniloff, R. 2006. Metrical/syllabic factors in English allophony: Dark /l/. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 20: 109–117.
Özçelik, Ö. 2011. Representation and Acquisition of Stress: The Case of Turkish. PhD dissertation, McGill University.
Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse, R.A. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–72.
Sproat, R. & Fujimura, O. 1993. Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics 21: 291–311.
Tsimpli, I.M. & Dimitrakopoulou, M. 2007. The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23: 215–242.
Underhill, R. 1976. Turkish Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Yuan, J. & Liberman, M. 2009. Investigating /l/ variation in English through forced alignment. In
Proceedings of Interspeech
2009: 2215–2218.
Yuan, J. & Liberman, M. 2011. ‘/l/ variation in American English: A corpus approach’. Journal of Speech Sciences 1: 35–46.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Özçelik, Öner
2024. The Phonology of Turkish,
Barrios, Shannon L, Joselyn M Rodriguez & Taylor Anne Barriuso
2023. The acquisition of L2 allophonic variants: The role of phonological distribution and lexical cues. Second Language Research 39:3 ► pp. 899 ff.
Hayes-Harb, Rachel & Shannon Barrios
2021. The influence of orthography in second language phonological acquisition. Language Teaching 54:3 ► pp. 297 ff.
Erdener, Doğu
2020. Second Language Instruction. In Handbook of Research on Bilingual and Intercultural Education [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 105 ff.
Showalter, Catherine E.
2020. RUSSIAN PHONO-LEXICAL ACQUISITION AND ORTHOGRAPHIC INPUT. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:2 ► pp. 255 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.