Cover not available
Part of
Second Language Acquisition of Turkish
Edited by Ayşe Gürel
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 59] 2016
► pp. 165–191

Syntax/semantics/pragmatics of yes/no question in second language Turkish

| Middle East Technical University
| Middle East Technical University
This paper examines the second language (L2) acquisition of the syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of Turkish yes/no (yn) questions across learners of different proficiency. Employing three tasks, we tested the participants’ knowledge of the syntax of yn questions, the semantic interpretations they assign to the construction, and their mastery of the pragmatic constraints that govern the use of various points of yn questions. Although the results show that the participants’ performance in all three areas we tested is commensurate with their overall proficiency in Turkish, the pragmatic competence of L2 learners seems to lag behind their competence in both syntax and semantics. This points to difficulties that interface phenomena pose to L2 learners, relative to narrow syntax.
Keywords: L2 Turkish, syntax-pragmatics interface, syntax-semantics interface, Turkish question particle, yes/no questions
Published online: 25 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.59.07gra
References (41)
References
Anderson, B. 2008. Forms of evidence and grammatical development in the acquisition of adjective position in L2 French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aygen, G. 2007. Q-particle. Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi 4: 1–30.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. & Leonini, C. 2004. Subject Inversion in L2 Italian. In EUROSLA Yearbook 4, S. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood Smith, A. Sorace & M. Ota (eds), 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E. & Sorace, A. 2007. Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G. 1999. Syntax-semantics interface. In MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, 
Wilson, R.A. & F.C. Keil, 744–745. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coppieters, R. 1987. Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language 63: 544–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. & Hathorn, J. 2005. Quelque chose...de remarquable in English-French acquisition: Mandatory, informationally encapsulated computations in second language interpretation. Second Language Research 21: 291–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. & Sprouse, R. 2001. Mental design and (second) language epistemology: Adjectival restrictions of wh-quantifiers and tense in English-French interlanguage. Second Language Research 17: 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S. 1983. A Study of the Effects of Principal Branching Direction in Second Language Acquisition: The Generalization of a Parameter of Universal Grammar from First to Second Language Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
. 1987. A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition: Experimental Studies in Anaphora. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franceschina, F. 2001. Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research 17(3): 213–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C.C. 2005. Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagstrom, P. 1998. Decomposing Questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 2000. The movement of question particles. In NELS 30: Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society, M. Hirotani, A. Coetzee, N. Hall & J.-Y. Kim (eds), 275–286. 
Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Chan, C. 1997. The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis.’ Second Language Research 13: 187–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B. & Schwartz, B.D. 1997. Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In Proceedings of the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD), E. Hughes, M. Hughes & A. Greenhill (eds), 257–268. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Ionin, T. & Wexler, K. 2002. Why is “is” easier than “-s”?: Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child L2-English learners. Second Language Research 18: 95–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ioup, G. 1984. Is there a structural foreign accent? A comparison of syntactic and phonological errors in second language acquisition. Language Learning 34: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, M., Kempchinsky, P. & Rothman, J. 2008. Interface vulnerability and knowledge of the subjunctive/indicative distinction with negated epistemic predicates in L2 Spanish. In EUROSLA Yearbook 8, L. Roberts, F. Myles & A. David (eds), 135–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamalı, B. 2011. The Question Particle in Turkish: Consequences for the Interfaces. In Online complement to Proceedings of WCCFL 28, M. Byram Washburn, S. Ouwayda, Ch. Ouyang, B. Yin, C. Ipek, L. Marston & A. Walker (eds). <[URL]> (22 January, 2014).Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. 1998. Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research 14: 359–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Liceras, J. 1988. Syntax and stylistics: More on the pro-drop parameter. In Learnability and Second Languages: A Book of Readings, J. Pankhurst, M. Sharwood Smith & P. Van Buren (eds), 71–93. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lozano, C. 2009. Selective deficits at the syntax-discourse interface. In Representational Deficits in SLA: Studies in Honor of Roger Hawkins [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 47], N. Snape, Y.-K.I. Leung & M. Sharwood Smith (eds), 127–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.T. & 1997. OPC effects in the L2 acquisition of Spanish. In Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish, Vol. 1: Developing Grammars, A.T. Pérez-Leroux & W. Glass (eds), 149–165. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.T. & Glass, W. 1999. Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: Probabilistic versus generative approaches. Second Language Research 15: 220–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. & White, L. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16(2): 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. 2009. Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences? L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 951–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. 2010. Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition.Lingua 120: 2444–2462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. 2005. Selective optionality in language development. In Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 265], L. Cornips & K. P. Corrigan (eds), 55–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Gradedness and optionality in mature and developing grammars. In Gradience in Grammar, G. Fanselow, C. Féry, R. Vogel & M. Schlesewsky (eds), 106–123. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. & Filiaci, F. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22: 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. & Serratrice, L. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2): 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M. & Sorace, A. 2006. Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 30) , D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds), 653–64. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Valenzuela, E. 2005. L2 Ultimate Attainment and the Syntax-Discourse Interface: The Acquisition of Topic Constructions in Non-Native Spanish and English. PhD dissertation, McGill University.
Valenzuela, E. 2006. L2 endstate grammars and incomplete acquisition of the Spanish CLLD constructions. In Inquiries in Linguistic Development: In Honor of Lydia White, R. Slabakova, S. Montrul & P. Prévost (eds), 283–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L. 2011. Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua 121: 577–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar