Cover not available
Part of
Studies in Chinese and Japanese Language Acquisition: In honor of Stephen Crain
Edited by Mineharu Nakayama, Yi-ching Su and Aijun Huang
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 60] 2017
► pp. 107–126

Chapter 5
Interpretation of bound pronouns by learners of Japanese Sign Language

| Keio University
| University of Connecticut
This study deals with the interpretation of bound pronouns by hearing learners of Japanese Sign Language (JSL). It is the first attempt to investigate JSL second language (L2) acquisition from a theoretical perspective. The Overt Pronoun Constraint (OPC) states that an overt pronoun can be bound by a referential NP, but not by an operator (including quantifiers and Wh-elements). JSL, as well as Japanese, allows an overt pronoun to corefer with a referential NP. However, (at least in some cases) the overt pronoun can be bound by a Wh-operator in JSL, but never in Japanese. A Truth-Value Judgment Task (TVJT) study was conducted, with different levels of Japanese-speaking learners of JSL, to observe if the OPC applies to a L1-L2 pair in different modalities, with different OPC status. The results showed that there was an anti-OPC effect among beginners, which lessened somewhat for intermediate learners.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Previous studies of L2 acquisition
  • 2.JSL and OPC
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Procedure
    • 3.3Material
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 24 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.60.06mat
References (33)
References
Chen Pichler, D. & Koulidobrova, E. 2016. Acquisition of sign language as a second language (L2). In The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies in Language: Research, Policy, and Practice, M. Marschark & P. Elizabeth Spencer (eds), 218–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S. 1991. Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14: 597–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. & McKee, C. 1985. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. NELS 15: 94–110. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Thornton, R. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crasborn, O., van der Kooij, E., Ros, J. & De Hoop, H. 2009. Topic agreement in NGT (Sign Language of the Netherlands). The Linguistic Review 26: 355–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S.D. 1996. The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language. Lingua 98: 103–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J. & Rosen, S.T. 1990. Knowledge and obedience: The developmental status of the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 187–222.Google Scholar
Hoji, H. 1991. Kare. In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: In Honor of Prof . S.-Y. Kuroda, R. Ishihara & C. Georgopoulos (eds), 287–304. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ichida, Y., Namba, Y., Fushihara, M., Miyake, M. & Yoshii, M. 2001. Nihon shuwa bogo washa jinko tokei no kokoromi (A preliminary statistics of the population of the native signers of Japanese Sign Language). Paper presented in the 27th annual meeting of Japanese Association for Sign Language Studies.Google Scholar
Ichida, Y. 2010. Introduction to Japanese Sign Language: Iconicity in language. In Studies in Language Sciences 9, M. Hirawaka, S. Inagaki, S. Arita, Y.G. Butler, K. Horie, E. Hauser, Y. Shirai & J. Tsubakita (eds), 3–32. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kahraman, B. & Nakayama, M. 2015. Interpretations of kare/kanojo by Turkish speaking learners of Japanese. Ars Linguistica 21: 18–38.Google Scholar
Kanda, K., Kimura, T. & Hara, D. 2008. Nihon no rousha jinko no suikei (An estimate of the deaf population in Japan). Paper presented at the 34th annual meeting of Japanese Association for Sign Language Studies.Google Scholar
Kanno, K. 1997. The acquisition of null and overt pronominals in Japanese by English speakers. Second Language Acquisition 5: 317–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimura, H. 2011. Nihon shuwa to nihongo taio shuwa: Aida ni aru fukai tani (Japanese sign language and signed Japanese: A deep gap between them). Tokyo: Seikatsu Shoin.Google Scholar
Koulidobrova, E. 2012. When the Quiet Surfaces: ‘Transfer’ of Argument Omission in the Speech of ASL English Bilinguals. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
2013. Some arguments against the DP in ASL. A paper presented at Paris 8: Langues avec articles – langues sans articles.Google Scholar
Koulidobrova, E. & Lillo-Martin, D. 2016. A ‘point’ of inquiry: The case of the (non-) pronominal IX in ASL. In The Impact of Pronominal Form on Interpretation, P. Grosz & P. Patel-Grosz (eds), 221–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1965. Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. & Klima, E. 1990. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Vol. 1, S.D. Fischer & P. Siple (eds), 191–210. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MacLaughlin, D. 1997. The Structure of Determiner Phrases: Evidence from American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Masumoto, A. 2008. Overt Pronouns and Bound Variable Reading in L2 Japanese. MA thesis, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, K. 2015. Nihon shuwa de manabu shuwa gengogaku no kiso (Foundations of sign language linguistics with a special reference to Japanese Sign Language). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Meier, R.P. & Lillo-Martin, D. 2013. The points of language. Humana.mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 24: 151–176.Google Scholar
Montalbetti, M. 1984. After Binding: On the Interpretation of Pronouns. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Oka, N. & Akahori, H. 2011. Nihon shuwa no shikumi (Structure of Japanese sign language). Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Padden, C.A. 1988. Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language [Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics]. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Pimentel, C. & Nakayama, M. 2012. Pronominal interpretations in L2 Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 28: 111–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. 2009. Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax – pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 951–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, M. 2007. Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43: 203–227.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. & Lillo-Martin, D. 2006. Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, P. 2013. Anaphora: Insights from Sign Language (Summary). 　 <[URL]>Google Scholar
Uchibori, A. & Matsuoka, K. 2013. Some observations on wh-clauses in Japanese Sign Language. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 29: 17–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L. 2003. On the nature of interlanguage representation: Universal grammar in the second language. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & M. Long (eds), 19–42. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Pichler, Deborah Chen & Elena Koulidobrova
2023. The Role of Modality in L2 Learning: The Importance of Learners Acquiring a Second Sign Language (M2L2 and M1L2 Learners). Language Learning 73:S1 ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Su, Yi-ching, Ho-Yun Hsieh, Devin Tankersley & Chia-Hsing Chen
2023. On null-subject languages and the Overt Pronoun Constraint: A comparison of English, Mandarin and Japanese. Second Language Research DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.