References (37)
References
Barss, A. 1986. Chains and Anaphoric Dependence. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. & Takahashi, D. 1998. Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 347–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds), 232–286. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Crain, S. 1991. Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14: 597–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. & Mckee, C. 1985. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS15), S. Berman, J-W. Choe & J. McDonough (eds), 94–110. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Thornton, R. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fukui, N. 1991. Strong and weak barriers: Remarks on the proper characterization of barriers. In Current English Linguistics in Japan, H. Nakajima (ed), 77–93. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. Parameters and optionality. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 399–420.Google Scholar
Haig, J.H. 1980. Some observations on quantifier floating in Japanese. Linguistics 18: 1065–1083. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harada, S.-I. 1977. Nihongo-ni henkei-wa hitsuyoo-da [Japanese grammar requires transformational rules]. Gengo 6(10): 88–95, 6(11): 96–103.Google Scholar
Hayashibe, H. 1975. Word order and particles: A developmental study in Japanese. Descriptive and Applied Linguistics 8: 1–18.Google Scholar
Hayashishita, J.-R. 2000. Scope ambiguity and scrambling. In Proceedings of the 19th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL19), R. Billerey & B.D. Lillehaugen (eds), 204–271. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1980. Bun-kouzou-no hikaku (The comparison of sentence structures). In Niti-eigo Hikaku Kouza, 2:Bunpou (Lectures on Japanese-English Comparative Studies 2: Grammar), T. Kunihiro (ed), 23–61. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Masunaga, K. 1983. Bridging. In Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists, S. Hattori & K. Inoue (eds), 455–460. Tokyo: Proceedings Publishing Committee.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, S. 1989. Structure and Case Marking in Japanese. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1997. Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 1–26.Google Scholar
Murasugi, K. 1988. Structural and pragmatic constraints on children’s understanding of backwards anaphora. UConn Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 40–68. Storrs CT: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
2000. Bunpoo kakutoku: Idou gensyoo-o tyuusin tosite (The acquisition of grammar with special reference to movement). Academia: Literature and Language 68: 223–259. (Nanzan University).Google Scholar
Murasugi, K. & Kawamura, T. 2005. On the acquisition of scrambling in Japanese. In The Free Word Order Phenomenon: Its Syntactic Sources and Diversity, J. Sabel & M. Saito (eds), 221–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nakayama, M. 1988. Acquisition of Lexical and Structural Properties in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Nemoto, N. 1993. Chains and Case Positions: A Study from Scrambling in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Otsu, Y. 1981. Universal Grammar and Syntactic Development in Children: Toward a Theory of Syntactic Development. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1994. Early acquisition of scrambling in Japanese. In Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8], T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (eds), 253–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, J.R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Saito, M. 1985. Some Asymmetries in Japanese and their Theoretical Implications. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1992. Long-distance scrambling in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 69–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003a. A derivational approach to the interpretation of scrambling chains. Lingua 113: 481–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003b. On the role of selection in the application of Merge. In Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS33), M. Kadowaki & S. Kawahara (eds), 323–345. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Saito, M. & Fukui, N. 1998. Order in phrase structure and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 439–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, M. & Hoji, H. 1983. Weak crossover and move α in Japanese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1: 245–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sano, K. 1977. An experimental study on the acquisition of Japanese simple sentences and cleft sentences. Descriptive and Applied Linguistics 10: 213–233.Google Scholar
Sano, T. 2007. Early acquisition of copy & movement in a Japanese OSV sentence. In BUCLD 31 Online Proceedings Supplement, H. Caunt-Nulton, S. Kulatilake & I-H. Woo (eds), <[URL]>Google Scholar
Suzuki, T. & Yoshinaga, N. 2013. Children’s knowledge of hierarchical phrase structure: Quantifier floating in Japanese. Journal of Child Language 40: 628–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tada, H. 1993. A/A-bar Partition in Derivation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ueyama, A. 1998. Two Types of Dependency. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, N. 1984. On parasitic gaps in Japanese: A preliminary study. Ms, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Orita, Naho, Hajime Ono, Naomi H. Feldman & Jeffrey Lidz
2021. Japanese children’s knowledge of the locality ofzibunandkare. Language Acquisition 28:4  pp. 327 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.