Cover not available
Part of
Nominal Compound Acquisition
Edited by Wolfgang U. Dressler, F. Nihan Ketrez and Marianne Kilani-Schoch
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61] 2017
► pp. 19–37

Chapter 1
Emergence and early development of German compounds

| | University of Vienna
|
|
The West Germanic language German is particularly rich and productive in nominal compounding, especially of noun-noun compounds. This chapter presents and analyzes the longitudinal data of three Viennese children up to 3;0 and the transversal data of 28 children at 3;0 and 3;3 (14 low, 14 high socio-economic status). The analysis focuses on amalgams vs. compounds, order of emergence of word classes of their modifiers from nouns over verbs to adjectives etc., from interfixless to interfixed compounds (of several subtypes), on the facilitating impact of input frequency, productivity and transparency. Finally, it accounts for the rise of complexity and a blind-alley development and their evidence for morphology and acquisition theory.
Keywords: amalgams, blind-alley development, interfixes, morphological complexity, socio-economic status
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Nominal compounding in adult Austrian German
  • 3.A brief history of research
  • 4.Acquisition data
  • 5.Amalgams
  • 6.Phrases vs. compounds?
  • 7.Emergence of compounding
  • 8.Order of emergence of compounds with and without interfixes
  • 9.A blind-alley development
  • 10.Productivity and emergence of compound patterns
  • 11.The impact of transparency
  • 12.Recursivity
  • 13.Discussion and outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.61.02kor
References (41)
References
Aksu-Koç, A. & Slobin, D. I. 1985. The acquisition of Turkish. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1, D. I. Slobin (ed), 839–878. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bartke, S.. 1998. Experimentelle Studien zur Flexion und Wortbildung. Pluralmorphologie und lexikalische Komposition im unauffälligen Spracherwerb und im Dysgrammatismus (Experimental Studies on Inflection and Word Formation. Plural Morphology and lexical Compounding in Typical Language Development and Dysgrammatism). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, T.. 2012. The cohesiveness of English and German compounds. Mental Lexicon 7: 1–33.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Boundary permeability: A parameter for linguistic typology. Linguistic Typology 18: 489–531.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A. 2009. Children’s acquisition of compounds. In The Handbook of Compounding, R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 298–322. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bittner, D.. 2003. The emergence of verb inflection in two German-speaking children. In Bittner, Dressler & Kilani-Schoch (eds). 53–88. Berlin: De Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bittner, D., Dressler, W. U. & Kilani-Schoch, M.. (eds). 2003. Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Acquisition 21]. Berlin: De Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Marcus, G., Bartke, S. & Wiese, R.. 1996. Compounding and inflection in German child language. Yearbook of Morphology 1995: 115–142.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A. & Marcus, G.. 1992. Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition 45: 225–255.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Berman, R. A. 1984. Structure and use in the acquisition of word formation. Language 60: 547–590.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U. 1988. Preferences vs. strict universals in morphology: Word-based rules. In Theoretical Morphology. Approaches in Modern Linguistics, M. Hammond & M. Noonan (eds), 143–154. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. & Laaha, S.. 2012. The impact of types of analogy on first language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio 11: 107–121.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Kilani-Schoch, M. & Klampfer, S.. 2003. How does a child detect morphology? Evidence from production. In Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (eds), 391–425. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Lettner, L. E. & Korecky-Kröll, K.. 2010. First language acquisition of compounds with special emphasis on early German child language. In Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], S. Scalise & I. Vogel (eds), 323–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Acquisition of German diminutive formation and compounding in a comparative perspective: Evidence for typology and the role of frequency. In Current Issues in Morphological Theory. (Ir)regularity, Analogy and Frequency [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 322], F. Kiefer, M. Ladányi & P. Siptár (eds), 237–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Libben, G., Stark, J., Pons, C. & Jarema, G.. 2001. The processing of interfixed German compounds. Yearbook of Morphology 1999: 185–220.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U. & Merlini Barbaresi, L.. 1994. Morphopragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Stark, J. A., Pons, C., Nault, K., Jarema, G. & Libben, G.. 2012. Interfix knowledge is fixed: Evidence from the composition of German compounds by persons with aphasia. Anzeiger der phil.-hist . Klasse der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 136(2): 5–30.Google Scholar
Fleischer, W.. 1976. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache (Word Formation of Contemporary German). Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar
Fuhrhop, N.. 1996. Fugenelemente (Linking elements). In Deutsch – typologisch, E. Lang & G. Zifonun (eds), 525–550. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoff, E.. 2003. Causes and consequences of SES-related differences in parent-to-child speech. In Socioeconomic Status, Parenting, and Child Development, M. H. Bornstein & R. H. Bradley (eds), 147–160. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M. & Dressler, W. U. 2005. Morphologie naturelle et flexion du verbe français (Natural Morphology and French Verb Inflection). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Klampfer, S.. 2003. Emergence of verb paradigms in one Austrian child. In Bittner, Dressler & Kilani-Schoch (eds). 297–323. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korecky-Kröll, K.. 2011. Der Erwerb der Nominalmorphologie bei zwei Wiener Kindern: Eine Untersuchung im Rahmen der Natürlichkeitstheorie (Acquisition of Nominal Morphology by two Viennese Children: An Investigation in the Framework of Natural Morphology). PhD dissertation, Universität Wien.
Korecky-Kröll, K., Czinglar, C., Uzunkaya-Sharma, K. & Dressler, W. U. 2014. Sozioökonomischer Status und Mehrsprachigkeit als Faktoren für den Wortschatz- und Grammatikerwerb bei Wiener Kindergartenkindern (Socioeconomic status and multilingualism as factors for the acquisition of lexicon and grammar by Viennese kindergarten children). In Tagungsband der GeSUS-Fachtagung 2014, J. Lauková et al. (eds), 515–523. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
Korecky-Kröll, K. & Dressler, W. U. 2007. Diminutives and hypocoristics in Austrian German (AG). In The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43], I. Savickienė & W. U. Dressler (eds), 207–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The acquisition of number and case in Austrian German nouns. In Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, U. Stephany & M. Voeikova (eds), 265–302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Acquisition of German adjective inflection and semantics by two Austrian children. In Semantics and Morphology of Early Adjectives in First Language Acquisition, E. Tribushinina, M. D. Voeikova & S. Noccetti (eds), 23–52. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Krott, A., Schreuder, R., Baayen, R. H. & Dressler, W. U. 2007. Analogical effects on linking elements in German compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes 22: 25–57.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laaha, S., Ravid, D., Korecky-Kröll, K., Laaha, G. & Dressler, W. U. 2006. Early noun plurals in German: Regularity, productivity or default? Journal of Child Language 33: 271–302.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lettner, L. E., Korecky-Kröll, K. & Dressler, W. U. 2011. Charakteristika von deutschen Nominalkomposita in der protomorphologischen Phase des Erstspracherwerbs (Characteristics of German nominal compounds in the protomorphological phase of first language acquisition). In Wortbildung im Deutschen zwischen Sprachsystem und Sprachgebrauch: Perspektiven – Analysen – Anwendungen, H. Elsen & S. Michel (eds), 191–208. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag.Google Scholar
Libben, G., Boniecki, M., Martha, M., Mittermann, K., Korecky-Kröll, K. & Dressler, W. U. 2009. Interfixation in German compounds: What factors govern acceptability judgements? In Compounds between Syntax and Lexicon, L. Gaeta & M. Grossmann (eds). Italian Journal of Linguistics 21(1): 149–180.Google Scholar
Libben, G. & Jarema, G.. (eds). 2006. The Representation and Processing of Compound Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Libben, G., Jarema, G., Dressler, W. U., Stark, J. & Pons, C.. 2002. Triangulating the effects of interfixation in the processing of German compounds. Folia Linguistica 37: 23–43.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mellenius, I.. 1997. The Acquisition of Nominal Compounding in Swedish. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E.. 2006. Preschool children’s acquisition of compounds. In The Representation and Processing of Compound Words, G. Libben & G. Jarema (eds), 96–124. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ortner, L. & Müller-Bollhagen, E.. 1991. Deutsche Wortbildung, Hauptteil IV: Substantivkomposita (German Word Formation, Part IV: Noun Compounds). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rainer, F.. 2010. Carmens Erwerb der deutschen Wortbildung (Carmen’s Acquisition of German Word Formation). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1985. Cross-linguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 2, D. I. Slobin (ed), 1157–1256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Vollmann, R. & Bruyère, S.. 1995. Über den Erwerb mentaler Operationen am Beispiel der Possession: Eine Korpusanalyse (On the acquisition of mental operations examplified by possession: A corpus analysis). Grazer Linguistische Studien 43: 117–131.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Kjærbæk, Laila & Hans Basbøll
2021. Chapter 4. Emergence and early development of derivatives in Danish child language. In The Acquisition of Derivational Morphology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 66], ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Sommer-Lolei, Sabine, Veronika Mattes, Katharina Korecky-Kröll & Wolfgang U. Dressler
2021. Chapter 5. Early phases of development of German derivational morphology. In The Acquisition of Derivational Morphology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 66], ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Sommer-Lolei, Sabine, Veronika Mattes, Katharina Korecky-Kröll & Wolfgang U. Dressler
2023. Acquisition and processing of word formation in German. Acta Linguistica Academica 70:3 ► pp. 372 ff. DOI logo
Werner, Martina, Veronika Mattes & Katharina Korecky-Kröll
2020. The development of synthetic compounds in German: Relating diachrony with L1 acquisition. Word Structure 13:2 ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.