Part of
Nominal Compound Acquisition
Edited by Wolfgang U. Dressler, F. Nihan Ketrez and Marianne Kilani-Schoch
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61] 2017
► pp. 165189
References (25)
References
Argus, R.. 2008. Eesti keele muutemorfoloogia omandamine (Acquisition of Morphology in Estonian). Tallinna ülikooli humanitaarteaduste dissertatsioonid [Tallinn University Dissertations on Humanities 19]. PhD dissertation, TLÜ Kirjastus (Tallinn University Press).
. 2009. The early development of case and number in Estonian. In Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, U. Stephany & M. D. Voeikova (eds), 111–152. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Kausatiivsuse omandamisest eesti keeles (On the Acquisition of Causativity). Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat (Yearbook of Estonian Society of Applied Linguistics) 8: 5–20.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Argus, R., Ijäs Johansen, J. & Laalo, K.. 2014. Liitsõnade omandamine eesti, soome ja saami keeles: Ühist ja erinevat (Acquisition of compounds in Estonian, Finnish and Saami: Similarities and differences). Keel ja Kirjandus (Language and Literature) 7–8: 1–21.Google Scholar
Argus, R. & Kazakovskaya, V.. 2013. Acquisition of compounds in Estonian and Russian: Frequency, productivity, transparency and simplicity effect. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat (Yearbook of Estonian Society of Applied Linguistics) 9: 23–42.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisetto, A. & Scalise, S.. 2005. The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio (Languages and Language) 4(2): 319–332.Google Scholar
Bittner, D., Dressler W. U. & Kilani-Schoch, M.. 2003. Introduction. In Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies on Language Acquisition 21], D. Bittner, W. U. Dressler & M. Kilani-Schoch (eds), vii–xxxvii. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U. 1999. What is natural in natural Morphology? Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague (Prague Linguistic Circle Papers) 3: 135–144.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Morphological typology and first language acquisition: Some mutual challenges. In Morphology and Linguistic Typology, G. Booij, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi & S. Scalise (eds), 7–20. Bologna: Università degli studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Lettner, L. E. & Korecky-Kröll, K.. 2010. First language acquisition of compounds with special emphasis on early German child language. In Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], S. Scalise & I. Vogel (eds), 323–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erelt, M.. 2003. Preface. In Estonian Language [Linguistica Uralica Supplementary Series 1], M. Erelt (ed.) 7–8, 7–129. Tallinn: EA Publishers.Google Scholar
Guelzow, I. & Gagarina, N.. 2007. Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haman, E.. 2003. Early productivity in derivation. A case study of diminutives in the acquisition of Polish. Psychology of Language and Communication 7(1): 37–56.Google Scholar
Kasik, R.. 2013. Komplekssete sõnade struktuur (The Structure of Complex Words). Tartu Ülikooli eesti keele osakonna preprindid (Preprints of the Department of Estonian of the University of Tartu).
Kazakovskaya, V. & Argus, R.. 2016. Acquisition of epistemic marking in Estonian and Russian. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat (Yearbook of Estonian Society of Applied Linguistics) 12: 57–80.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerge, K.. 1990. Liitsõna. Mõisteid ja seoseid (Compound. Definitions and Relationships). Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia (Academy of Sciences of Estonia).Google Scholar
. 2016. Word-formation in the individual European languages: Estonian. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of Languages in Europe [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Sciences], P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (eds), 3228−3259. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M. & Dressler, W. U. 2005. Morphologie naturelle et flexion du verbe français (Natural Morphology and French Verbal Inflection). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Laalo, K.. 1994. Kaksitavuvaihe lapsen kielen kehityksessa (Disyllabic Period in the Acquisition of Language). Virittäjä (Tuner) 3: 430–448.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 2 Vols. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E.. 2006. Pre-school children’s acquisition of compounds. In The Representation and Processing of Compound Words, Gary Libben & Gonia Jarema (eds), 96–125. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Padrik, M.. 2010. Word-formation Skills in Estonian Children with Specific Language Impairment [Dissertationes Pedagogicae Universitatis Tartuensis 8]. PhD dissertation. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus (Tartu University Press).Google Scholar
Saari, H.. 1987. Opisanie slovoobrazovatel’nyh èlementov pri složnoj sisteme fonetičeskih čeredovanij (èstonskij jazyk) (Description of Word-formation Elements in a Complicated System of Phonetic Alternations (Estonian Language)). PhD dissertation, Institute of the Estonian Language.
Stephany, U. & Voeikova, M.. (eds). 2009. Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vare, Silvi. 2012. Eesti keele sõnapered (Estonian Word Families). Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus (Foundation of Estonian Language).Google Scholar