Cover not available
Part of
On the Acquisition of the Syntax of Romance
Edited by Anna Gavarró
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 62] 2018
► pp. 91–116

Favorable processing conditions in the production of passive sentences by Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children

 | Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) | Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ)
 | Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) | Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ)
 | Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) | Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ)
This study focuses on the production of passives by children (3–4 and 5–6 years old) under favorable conditions. An experiment is reported in which passives were elicited by priming in a Snap Game, where a central character was the patient of the events depicted in the cards to be described by the children. All children produced at least one passive and their overall number exceeded passives in prior studies; reversed roles were negligible. In a subsequent image description task, passives were elicited in less favorable conditions. Syntactic priming prevailed across tasks. A procedural account of the production of passives and of the effect of priming is provided, which supports the argument for children’s early competence to compute verbal passives.
Keywords: favorable processing conditions, discourse continuity, syntactic priming, verbal passives
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Portuguese verbal passives and the production of passives by Portuguese-speaking children
  • 3.Computing verbal passives in a psycholinguistic perspective
    • 3.1Syntactic priming
    • 3.2Discourse continuity
  • 4.The experimental study
    • 4.1First task
      • Method
      • Results
      • Discussion
    • 4.2A second task
      • Methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
  • 5.General discussion
  • 6.Final remarks
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.62.05lim
References (72)
References
Baker, M., Johnson, K., & Roberts, I. (1989). Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 219–251.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & Devescovi, A. (1989). Crosslinguistic studies of sentence production. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp.225–253). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Harris, C., Marchman, V., Wulfect, B., & Kritchevsky, M. (1995). Production of complex syntax in normal ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 487–539.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp.173–218). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bencini, G., & Valian, V. (2008). Abstract sentence representations in 3-year-olds: Evidence from language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 97–113.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp.279–362). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1–47.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104(3), 437–458. :DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99, 150–171.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C. (1998). A minimalist view on the passive. University of Connecticut, Papers in Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Borer, H. & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp.123–172). Dordrecht: Reidel.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H., & Wexler, K. (1992). Bi-unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 10(2), 147–189.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H., Mclean, J., & Jones, M. (2005). A blue cat or a cat that is blue? Evidence for abstract syntax in young children’s noun phrases. In A. Brugos, M. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), BUCLD 29: The proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.109–121). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M., Liversedge, S., Stewart, A., & Urbach, T. (1995). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(6), 489–506.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Begun, J. S. (1968). The use of syntax in understanding sentences. The British Journal of Psychology, 59(3), 219–229.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2003). The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 214–230.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. (2005). A smuggling approach to raising in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(2), 289–298.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corrêa, L. M. S. (2005). Possíveis diálogos entre teoria linguística e psicolinguística: Questões de processamento, aquisição e do déficit específico da linguagem. In N. Miranda, M. C. L. Name (Eds.), Linguística e cognição (pp.221–244). Juiz de Fora: Editora da UFJF.Google Scholar
Corrêa, L. M. S., & Augusto, M. R. A. (2007). Computação linguística no processamento on-line: soluções formais para a incorporação de uma derivação minimalista em modelos de processamento. Caderno de Estudos Linguísticos, 49(2), 167–183.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Possible loci of SLI from a both linguistic and psycholinguistic perspective. Lingua, 121, 476–486.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., Thornton, R., & Murasugi, K. (2009). Capturing the evasive passive. Language Acquisition, 16(2), 123–133.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K. (1990). Subject, topic and the Sesotho passive. Journal of Child Language, 17, 67–84.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, J. G., & De Villiers, P. A. (1973). Development of the use of word order in comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(4), 331–341.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estrela, A. P. (2016). A estrutura passiva num corpus de aquisição. Fórum Linguístico, 13(1), 1009–1021. :DOI logo.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F. (1994). Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 715–736.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, W. A., & Van Valin Jr., R. D. (1985). Information packaging in the clause. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. I: Clause structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Frauenfelder, U. H., & Schreuder, R. (1991). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. E. Booij, & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (pp.165–183). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Gabriel, R. (2001). A aquisição das contruções passivas em português e inglês: um estudo translinguístico (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul.Google Scholar
Gámez, P. B., & Shimpi, P. M. (2016) Structural priming in Spanish as evidence of implicit learning. Journal of Child Language, 43(1), 207–233. :DOI logo.Google Scholar
Gehrke, B., & Grillo, N. (2009). How to become passive. In K. K. Grohmann (Ed.) Explorations of phase theory: Features, arguments, and interpretation at the interfaces (pp.231–268). Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1979). On understanding Grammar. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–279 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grillo, N. (2008). Generalized minimality: Syntactic underspecification in Broca’s aphasia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Shimpi, P. (2004). Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 182–195.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. L. (1985). Passive in the world's languages. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. I: Clause structure (pp.243–281). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Development Psychology, 48, 171–184. :DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kline, M., & Demuth, K. (2010). Factors facilitating implicit learning: The case of the Sesotho passive. Language Acquisition, 17(4), 220–234.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1977). Starting points. Language, 53, 152–168.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lima Júnior, J. C., & Augusto, M. R. A. (2014). The relevance of aspectual and semantic features for the comprehension of short passive sentences involving agentive and non-agentive verbs. In J. Costa, A. Fiéis, M. J. Freitas, M. Lobo, & A. L. Santos (Eds.), New directions in the acquisition of Romance languages. (pp.371–394), Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2015). Is ‘smuggling’ really necessary? The most recent analyses of passive sentences reconsidered in terms of phasehood and cyclic movement. ReVEL, special edition, 9. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Lima Júnior, J. C., & Corrêa, L. M. S. (2015a). The nature of computational cost in the comprehension of passives: An experimental investigation with adults. Letras de Hoje, 50(1), 91–101.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). Favorable discourse conditions in the processing of passive sentences: Two steps in the acquisition of verbal passives. Paper presented at the Romance Turn VII (RTVII), Ca’ Foscari, Venice.Google Scholar
(2016). Sentence-image mapping and the relevance of temporal/aspectual information in the comprehension of passive sentences by children. In M. Cavalcante et al. (Eds.), Questões em aquisição da linguagem e psicolinguística: fonologia e prosódia, língua de sinais, sintaxe e processamento (pp.575–589). João Pessoa: Mídia Gráfica e Editora.Google Scholar
Manetti, C. (2012). The acquisition of Italian passives: Evidence from comprehension, production and syntactic priming studies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Siena.Google Scholar
(2013). On the production of passives in Italian: Evidence from an elicited production task and a syntactic priming study with preschool children. In S. Bainz, N. Goldman, R. Hawkes (Eds.), BUCLD 37 proceedings online supplement (pp.1–16).Google Scholar
Maratsos, M., Kuczaj, S. A., Fox, D. C., & Chalkley, M. (1979). Some empirical issues in the acquisition of transformational relations. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 12, pp.1–45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M., Fox, D., Becker, J., & Chalkley, M. A. (1985). Semantic restrictions on children’s passives. Cognition, 56, 271–279.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., Bates, E., Burkardt, A., & Good, A. B. (1991). Functional constraints in the acquisition of the passive: toward a model of the competence to perform. First Language, 11, 65–92.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2012a). Is children's acquisition of the passive a staged process? Evidence from six- and nine-year-olds’ production of passives. Journal of Child Language, 39, 991–1016.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Messenger, K, Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Sorace, A. (2012b). Are children’s early passives semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 568–587.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, K., Grolla, E., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Long passives are understood by young children. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), BUCLD 30: Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.441–451). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Orfitelli, R. (2012). Argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Perotino, S. (1995). Mecanismos de indeterminação do agente: O fenômeno da apassivação na aquisição da linguagem (Unpublished MA thesis). Universidade de Campinas.Google Scholar
Pesirani, M. A. A. (2009). Aquisição de ‘ser’ e ‘estar’ em Português Brasileiro, com especial atenção as estruturas passivas. Paper presented at the 17 SIICUSP.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. (1996). Order and structure (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
(2003). Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 37–90.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1999). Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 136–141.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., Lebeaux, D., & Frost, L. (1987). Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition, 26, 195–267.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, F. M., Thomas, M. S., & Price, C. J. (2010). Neuronal activation for semantically reversible sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1283–1298.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2006). On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects, In L. Cheng, & N. Corver (Eds.), On wh movement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, M. (2004). A passiva na Síndrome de Down (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade Federal do Paraná.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 219–227.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, A. (1984). The passive: A comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Snyder, W., & Hyams, N. (2008). Children’s passives: The role of discourse features. Paper presented in the Psycholinguistics Brownbag Series, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 6 September. <[URL]>
(2015). Minimality effect in children's passives. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann and S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti (pp.343–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strohner, J., & Nelson, K. E. (1974). The young child’s development of sentence comprehension: Influence of event probability, nonverbal context, syntactic form, and strategies. Child Development, 45, 564–576.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volpato, F., Verin, L., & Cardinaletti, A. (2014). The acquisition of passives in Italian: Auxiliaries and answering strategies in an experiment of elicited production. In J. Costa, A. Fiéis, M. J. Freitas, M. Lobo, & A. L. Santos (Eds.), New directions in the acquisition of Romance languages (pp.371–394). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (2002). Lenneberg’s dream: Learning, normal language development and specific language impairment. In J. Schaeffer & Y. Levy (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Towards a definition of specific language impairment (pp.11–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2004). Theory of phasal development: Perfection in child grammar. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 48, 159–209.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Agostinho, Celina & Anna Gavarró Algueró
2021. The acquisition of verbal passives by Portuguese-speaking children. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 355], ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.