Arsenijevic, B., & Hinzen, W.
(2012) On the absence of X-within-X recursion in human grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(3), 423–440. :DOI logo.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(2008) On phases. In R. Freidin, P. Otero Carlos, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory (pp.133–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49. :DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2014) Minimal recursion: Exploring the prospects. In T. Roeper & M. Speas (Eds.), Recursion: Complexity in cognition (pp.1–17). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, A. M.
(2015) On the domain specificity of the human language faculty and the effects of principles of computational efficiency: Contrasting language and mathematics. Revista Linguística/Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Línguistica da Universidade Federal do Rio Janeiro, 11, 28–56.Google Scholar
Drăgan, R.
(2017) On the acquisition of prepositions in child Romanian. Paper presented at 5th Bucharest Colloquium of Language Acquisition, University of Bucharest, November 2017.Google Scholar
Giurgea, I.
(2015) Romanian adnominal locative PPs and argument structure. [URL].
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. Tecumseh
(2002) The faculty of language: what it is, who has it and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579. :DOI logo.Google Scholar
Limbach, M., & Adone, D.
(2010) Language acquisition of recursive possessives in English. In K. Franich, K. M. Iserman, & L. L. Keil (Eds.), BUCLD34: Proceedings of the 34th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.281–290). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Castilla-Earls, A. P., Béjar, S., & Massam, D.
(2012) Elmo’s sister’s ball: The problem of acquiring nominal recursion. Language Acquisition, 19, 301–311. :DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Peterson, T., Castilla-Earls, A. P., Massam, D., & Béjar, S.
(2015) Nominal reference, modification and the acquisition of complex NPs (Unpublished manuscript). University of Toronto, University of Arizona, SUNY/Fredonia.Google Scholar
Roberge, Y., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., & Frolova, A.
to appear). On recursive modification in child L1 French. Languages 2.
Roeper, T.
(2010) The minimalist microscope: How and where interface principles guide acquisition. In J. Chandlee, M. Franchini, S. Lord, & G. M. Rheiner (Eds.), BUCLD33: Proceedings of the 33rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.24–48). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2011) The acquisition of recursion: How formalism articulates the child’s path. Biolinguistics, 5, 57–86Google Scholar
Roeper, T. & Oseki, Y.
to appear). Recursion in the acquisition path for hierarchical syntactic structure. In L. Amaral, M. Maia, A. Nevins, & T. Roeper Eds. Recursion across domains Cambridge CUP DOI logo
Sevcenco, A., & Avram, L.
(2012) Romanian-speaking children’s comprehension of relatives. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LVII, 2, 219–239.Google Scholar
Sevcenco, A., Avram, L., & Stoicescu, I.
(2013) Subject and direct object relative clause production in child Romanian. In L. Avram & A. Sevcenco (Eds.), Topics in language acquisition and language learning in a Romanian context (pp.51–85). Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar
Sevcenco, A., Roeper, T., & Pearson-Zurer, B.
(2017) The acquisition of recursive locative PPs and relative clauses in child English. In H. Demirdache, J. Choi, O. Lungu, & L. Voeltzel (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2015 (pp.287–301). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Terunuma, A., Isobe, M., Nakajima, M., Okabe, R., Inada. S., Inokuma, S., & Nakato, T.
(2017) Acquisition of recursive possessives and locatives within DPs in Japanese. In M. LaMendola, & J. Scott (Eds.), BUCLD41: Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.626–636). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ticio, E., & Avram, L.
(2015) The acquisition of differential object marking in Spanish and Romanian: Semantic scales or semantic features? Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LX, 4, 383–403.Google Scholar
Tóth, A. É., Kiss, K., & Roeper, T.
(2016) The role of the visible functional head in the interpretation of recursion. Paper presented at GALANA 7, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, September 2016.Google Scholar
Tóth, A.
(2017) The role of functional heads in Hungarian PP recursion. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on the Structures of Hungarian (ICSH 13), Budapest, June 2017.Google Scholar