Part of
The Acquisition of Derivational Morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Veronika Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 66] 2021
► pp. 5384
References (49)
References
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M. 2015. A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In Handbook of Language Emergence, B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (eds), 478–510. Hoboken NJ: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amiot, D. 2004. Préfixes ou prépositions? Le cas de sur(-), sans(-), contre(-) et les autres. Lexique 16: 67–83.Google Scholar
Apothéloz, D. 2002. La construction du lexique français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
2007. La préfixation en RE-, l’antonymie directionnelle et les phénomènes de polarité sémantique. French Language Studies 17: 143–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arrivé, M., Gadet, F. & Galmiche, M. (eds) 1986. La grammaire d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. L. M. 2011. Word formation in Romance. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Vol. I, M. Maiden, J. C. Smith & A. Ledgeway (eds), 532–563. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R. & Plag, I. 2013. The analysis and limits of conversion. In The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology, L. Bauer, R. Lieber & I. Plag, 545–567. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Béchade, H.-D. 1992. Phonétique et morphologie du français contemporain. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. 1970. Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bonami, O. & Boyé, G. 2005. Construire le paradigme d’un adjectif. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 34: 77–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, O., Boyé, G. & Kerleroux, F. 2009. L’allomorphie radicale et la relation flexion–construction. In Aperçus de morphologie du français, B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux & M. Plénat (eds), 103–126. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Booij, G. 2012. The Grammar of Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. 1985. The acquisition of Romance, with special reference to French. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol.1, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 687–782. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1993. The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. Lexical creativity in French-speaking children. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 17: 513–530.Google Scholar
Corbin, D. 1987. Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Dal, G. 1997. Grammaire du suffixe -et(te). Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. & Merlini Barbaresi, L. 1994. Morphopragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferret, K. & Villoing, F. 2015. French N-age instrumentals: Semantic properties of the base verb. Morphology 25(4): 473–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fradin, B. 2003. Nouvelles approches en morphologie. Paris: PUF. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Compounding in French. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 417–435. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fradin, B., Hathout, N. & Meunier, F. 2003. La suffixation en -ET et la question de la productivité. Langue Française 140: 56–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, L. 2015. Lexeme formation in a conscious approach to the lexicon. In Semantics of Complex Words, L. Bauer, L. Körtvélyessy & P. Štekauer (eds), 115–141. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabar, N., Tribout, D., Dal, G., Fradin, B., Hathout, N., Lignon, S., Namer, F., Plancq, C., Yvon, F. & Zweigenbaum, P. 2006. Production quantitative des suffixations par -ité et -Able dans un corpus journalistique moderne. TALN 2006: 167–175.Google Scholar
Guilbert, L. 1975. La créativité lexicale. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Huot, H. 2001. Morphologie. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Kerleroux, F. 1996. La coupure invisible. Études de syntaxe et de morphologie. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M. 2017. Early development of compounds in two French children’s corpora. In Nominal Compound Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61], W. U. Dressler, F. N. Ketrez & M. Kilani-Schoch (eds), 91–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M. & Xanthos, A. 2013. The adjective petit ‘small, little’ in French acquisition data: An example of the relationship between pragmatics and morphosyntactic development. Journal of Pragmatics 56: 113–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koehl, A. 2012. La construction morphologique des noms désadjectivaux suffixés en français. PhD dissertation. Université de Lorraine.
Le Grand Robert de la langue française. 2018. <[URL]> (2 May 2021).
Lehmann, A. & Martin-Berthet, F. 1998. Introduction à la lexicologie. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Le Robert brio. 2012. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar
Lippeveld, M. & Oshima-Takane, Y. 2015a. Nouns to verbs to and verbs to nouns: When do children acquire class extension rules for deverbal nouns and denominal verbs? Applied Psycholinguistics 36(3): 559–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b. The effect of input on children’s cross-categorical use of polysemous noun-verb pairs. Language Acquisition 22: 209–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Manova, S. 2011. Understanding Morphological Rules. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marascuilo, L. A. & McSweeney, M. 1967. Nonparametric post hoc comparisons for trend. Psychological Bulletin 67(6): 401–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, I. 1996. Cours de morphologie générale, Vol. III. Montréal: CNRS.Google Scholar
Namer, F. & Villoing, F. 2008. Interpréter les noms déverbaux: Quelle relation avec la structure argumentale du verbe de base? Le cas des noms en -oir(e) du français. In Actes du 1er Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, J. Durand, B. Habert & B. Laks (eds), 1551–1569. Paris: EDP Sciences. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plénat, M. 2008. Le thème L de l’adjectif et du nom. In Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2008, J. Durand, B. Habert & B. Laks (eds), 1613–1626. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roché, M. 2009. Un ou deux suffixes? Une ou deux suffixations? In Aperçus de morphologie du français, B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux & M. Plénat (eds), 143–174. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Savickienė, I. & Dressler, W. U. (eds) 2007. The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trésor de la langue française informatisé (TLFi). <[URL]> (30 April 2021).
Tribout, D. 2010. Les conversions de nom à verbe et de verbe à nom en français. PhD dissertation. Université Paris Diderot.
Tribushinina, E., van den Bergh, H., Kilani-Schoch, M., Aksu-Koç, A., Dabašinskienė, I., Hrzica, G., Korecky-Kröll, K., Noccetti, S. & Dressler, W. U. 2013. The role of explicit contrast in adjective acquisition: A cross-linguistic longitudinal study of adjective production in spontaneous child speech and parental input. First Language 33(6): 594–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tribushinina, E., Voeikova, M. & Noccetti, S. (eds) 2015. Semantics and Morphology of Early Adjectives in First Language Acquisition. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Veneziano, E. 2017. Noun and verb categories in acquisition: Evidence from fillers and inflectional morphology in French-acquiring children. In Polycategoriality and Lexical Categories: Cross-linguistic, Cross-theoretical and Language Acquisition Approaches [Studies in Language Companion Series 182], V. Vapnarsky & E. Veneziano (eds), 381–411. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villoing, F. 2012. French compounds. Probus 2: 29–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Forshaw, William
2022. Book Review: Veronica Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler (Eds.), The acquisition of derivational morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective. First Language 42:5  pp. 696 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.