Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Derivational Morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Veronika Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 66] 2021
► pp. 217–236

Chapter 9
Acquisition of noun and verb derivation in Estonian

| Tallinn University
The aim of the study is to describe the acquisition of derivation in Estonian. The analysis is based on recorded spontaneous speech of three Estonian children between the ages of 1;3 and 3;1. The role of productivity, transparency, semantics and frequency of suffixes and patterns, as well as the learning strategy (from simplex to complex), have been analysed. The Estonian children started to use the first derivatives at the same time as the first compounds emerged and noun inflection started to develop. The number of different suffixes used by the children was quite large, but not all suffixes were used productively. The role of productivity and frequency can be observed in the order of the acquisition of the suffixes.
Keywords: first language, acquisition of derivation, noun derivation, verb derivation, Estonian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The system of derivation in the Estonian language
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1General overview of data
    • 4.2Emergence of the first suffixes
    • 4.3Further development of derivation: The productive use of first suffixes and the emergence of different formation patterns and suffixes
    • 4.4The general characteristics of the process of the acquisition of derivation: Rising complexity and word families
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.66.09arg
References (27)
References
Argus, R. 2009. The early development of case and number in Estonian. In Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, U. Stephany & M. D. Voeikova (eds), 111–152. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Kausatiivsuse omandamisest eesti keeles (Acquisition of causatives in Estonian). Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat (Yearbook of Estonian Applied Linguistics) 8: 5–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Acquisition of noun compounds in Estonian. In Nominal Compound Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61], W. U. Dressler, F. N. Ketrez & M. Kilani-Schoch (eds), 165–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Argus, R. & Kazakovskaya, V. V. 2018. Acquisition of noun derivation in Estonian and Russian L1. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat (Yearbook of Society of Estonian Applied Linguistics), 14: 23–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. 2014. Acquisition of derivational morphology. In Handbook of Derivational Morphology, R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 424–442. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. 2005. Morphological typology and first language acquisition: some mutual challenges. In Morphology and Linguistic Typology, G. Booij, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi & S. Scalise (eds), 7–20. Bologna: Università degli studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
2011. The rise of complexity in inflectional morphology. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47: 159–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Kilani-Schoch, M. & Klampfer, S. 2002. How does a child detect morphology? Evidence from production. In Morphological Structure in Language Processing [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 151], H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (eds), 391–425. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. & Merlini Barbaresi, L. 1994. Morphopragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Sommer-Lolei, S., Korecky-Kröll, K., Argus, R., Dabašinskienė, I., Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, L., Johansen Ijäs, J., Kazakovskaya, V. V., Laalo, K. & Thomadaki, E. 2019. First-language acquisition of synthetic compounds in Estonian, Finnish, German, Greek, Lithuanian, Russian and Saami. Morphology 29(3): 409–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. (ed.) 2014. Special volume on Linguistic Complexity. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50(2).Google Scholar
Erelt, M. (ed.) 2003. Estonian Language [Linguistica Uralica Supplementary Series]. Tallinn: Estonian Academy Publishers.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. B. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14(2–3): 150–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasik, R. 2012. Nulltuletus ja konversioon eesti keeles (Zero-derivation and conversion in Estonian). Keel ja Kirjandus 11: 793–806.Google Scholar
2015. Sõnamoodustus (Word formation). Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar
Kerge, K. 1991. Morfopragmaatilised seigad eesti tuletuses. (Morphopragmatics of Estonian derivation). In Eesti keele ja kirjanduse kateedri töid 2, J. Õispuu & K. Kerge (eds), 26–30. Tallinn: TPedI.Google Scholar
2003. Keele variatiivsus ja mine-tuletus allkeelte süntaktilise keerukuse tegurina (Linguistic varieties and regular nominalization as a factor of their syntactic complicacy). TPÜ humanitaarteaduste dissertatsioonid (Dissertations in Humanities of Tallinn Pedagogical University) 10. Tallinn: TPÜ kirjastus.Google Scholar
2016. Word-formation in the individual European languages: Estonian. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 40.5], P. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (eds), 3228–3259. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Diakidoy, I. N. & Anderson, R. C. 1993. The acquisition of morphology: Learning the contribution of suffixes to the meanings of derivatives. Journal of Reading Behaviour 25(2): 155–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padrik, M. 2010. Word-Formation Skills in Estonian Children with Specific Language Impairment [Dissertationes Pedagogicae Universitatis Tartuensis 8]. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar
Protassova, E. & Voeikova, M. 2007. Diminutives at the early stages of acquisition. In Savickienė & Dressler (eds), 43–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sahkai, H. 2011. Teine grammatika. Eesti keele teonimede süntaks konstruktsioonipõhises perspektiivis (The syntax of Estonian action nominalizations from the constructional perspective). Tallinn: TLÜK.Google Scholar
Savickienė, I. 2007. Form and meaning of diminutives in Lithuanian child language. In Savickienė & Dressler (eds), 13–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savickienė, I. & Dressler, W. U. (eds) 2007. The Acquisition of Diminutives [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vare, S. 2012. Eesti keele sõnapered I (Word families in Estonian). Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.Google Scholar
Zurek, W. H. (ed.) 1990. Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information. Redwood City CA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar