Cover not available
Part of
Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism: Features, interfaces, and beyond
Edited by Tania Leal, Elena Shimanskaya and Casilde A. Isabelli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 67] 2022
► pp. 1–8

Introduction

Published online: 17 August 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.67.00shi
References (31)
References
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 33, 3–49.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1986). Knowledge of language. Praeger.Google Scholar
(1995). The minimalist program. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1990). The comparative study of first and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 135–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2018). Notes on the Shallow Structure Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 693–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. (2005). A smuggling approach to raising in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(2), 289–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Anderson, B. (1998). Interlanguage A-bar dependencies: binding construals, null prepositions and Universal Grammar. Second Language Research, 14(4), 341–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L. (1993). On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition, 3(3), 183–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1994). Mapping from the initial state to the final state: The separation of universal principles and language-specific principles. In B. Lust, M. Suñer, & J. Whitman (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 1: Heads, projections and learnability (pp. 319–335). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goad, H., & White, L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22, 243–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Prosodic effects on L2 grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(6), 769-808. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, N. (2009). A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koster, J. (2013). Theories of language from a critical perspective. In J. Herschensohn & M. Yong-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 9–25). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Potsdam, E. (2006). Expanding the scope of control and raising. Syntax, 9(2), 171–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R. (2018). The generative approach to SLA and its place in modern Second Language studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 417–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1994). Word order and nominative case in non-native language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: Papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshops (pp. 317–368). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2008). Meaning in the second language. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., Leal, T. L., & Liskin-Gasparro, J. (2014). We have moved on: Current concepts and positions in generative SLA. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 601-606. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. (2010). Quantification. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23, 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1994). Direct access to X’-theory: Evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: Papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshops (pp. 265–316). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 12(1), 7–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1990/1991). The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 1(4), 337–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). Argument structure in second language acquisition. Journal of French Language Studies, 1(2), 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992). Long and short verb movement in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 37(2), 273–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua, 121(4), 577–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar