Cover not available
Part of
Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism: Features, interfaces, and beyond
Edited by Tania Leal, Elena Shimanskaya and Casilde A. Isabelli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 67] 2022
► pp. 137–156

Development of L2 prosody

The case of information focus

 | University of Shizuoka
 | Hiroshima University
 | University of Shizuoka
 | The Ohio State University
 | Osaka Jogakuin University
 | Daito Bunka University
This study examines the development of L2 English prosody as associated with information focus by Japanese EFL (JEFL) learners. Comprehension, perception, and production tasks were conducted with 54 participants in three sub-groups: low proficiency level JEFLs, high proficiency level JEFLs, and native English speakers. Results show that the low-level JEFLs could identify which parts of sentences require focus but they could not successfully perceive nor produce three different prosodic patterns associated with information focus. In contrast, high proficiency JEFLs demonstrated native-like performance, with a slight difficulty in producing post-focal compression. Our findings have implications for the syntax-discourse-prosody interface: (i) the interface knowledge develops through multiple stages, and (ii) the discourse-prosody interface is challenging for L2 learners.
Keywords: prosody, information focus, comprehension, perception, production, Japanese EFL learners
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Realizing information focus in English and Japanese
    • 2.1Information focus marking in English
    • 2.2Information focus marking in Japanese
    • 2.3Research questions
  • 3.Experiments
    • 3.1Comprehension task
    • 3.2Perception task
    • 3.3Production task
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 August 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.67.06fuj
References (45)
References
Beckman, M. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, D. (2009). Towards a typology of focus realization. In M. Zimmermann & C. Féry (Eds.), Information structure: Theoretical, typological and experimental perspectives (pp. 177–205). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Focus and intonation. In G. Russell & D. G. Fara (Eds.), The Routledge companion to the philosophy of language (pp. 103–115). Routledge.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 1–52). The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). The minimalist program. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. Harper & Row. [URL]Google Scholar
Cooper, W., Eady, S., & Mueller, P. (1985). Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 2142–2156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujimori, A., Yamane, N., & Yoshimura, N. (2017). The acquisition of prosodic focus marking in English dialogs and narratives. In M. Hirakawa, J. Matthews, K. Otaki, N. Snape, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of PacSLRF 2016 (pp. 53–57). Chuo University.Google Scholar
Goss, S., & Nakayama, M. (2011). Prosody and comprehension in oral reading by L2 Japanese learners. Second Language, 10, 33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hosaka, H. (1998). Discourse intonation in English and Japanese EFL speakers: A pilot study. ARELE, 9, 107–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, S. (2011). Japanese focus prosody revisited: Freeing focus from prosodic phrasing. Lingua, 121, 1870–1889. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, J., & Mester, A. (2012). Recursive prosodic phrasing in Japanese. In T. Borowsky, S. Kawahara, T. Shinya, & M. Sugahara (Eds.), Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk (pp. 280–303). Equinox.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jannedy, S. (2002). Hat patterns and double peaks: The phonetics and psycholinguistics of broad versus late narrow versus double focus intonations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University. DOI logo
Kubozono, H. (1993). The organization of Japanese prosody. Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kunevich, M., & Alexopoulou, D. (2014). Acquisition at interfaces: The case of prosodic focus marking. Paper presented at European Second Language Association 24, University of York, UK.Google Scholar
Liberman, M., & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 249–336.Google Scholar
Mori, Y., Hori, T., & Erickson, D. (2014). Acoustic correlates of English rhythmic patterns for American versus Japanese speakers. Phonetica, 71, 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakayama, M., & Yoshimura, N. (2015). The modularity of grammar in L2 acquisition. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Handbook of Japanese psycholinguistics (pp. 235–570). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M., Shukla, M., van de Vijver, R., Avesani, C., Schraudolf, H., & Donati, C. (2008). Different phrasal prominence realizations in VO and OV languages. Lingue e Linguaggio, 7, 139–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J., & Beckman, M. (1988). Japanese tone structure. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rochemont, M., (1986). Focus in generative grammar. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (1994). Word order and nominative case in non-native language acquisition: A longitudinal study of German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra, & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 317–368). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E., & Tateishi, K. (1991). Syntax and downstep in Japanese. In C. Georgopoulos & R. Ishihara (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda (pp. 519–543). Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. (2009). On clause and intonational phrase in Japanese: The syntactic grounding of prosodic constituent structure. Gengo Kenkyu, 136, 35–73.Google Scholar
Sityaev, D., & House, J. (2003). Phonetic and phonological correlated of broad, narrow and contrastive focus in English. In M. J. Sole, D. Recasens, & J. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1819–1822). Causal Productions.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2009). What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language? In M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul, & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2009) (pp. 280–294). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2004). Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretations and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 143–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugahara, M. (2003). Downtrends and post-focus intonation in Tokyo Japanese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [URL]
Takeda, A. (2018). English prosodic marking of information structure by L1-Japanese second language learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawai‘i, Manoa. [URL]
Truckenbrodt, H. (1995). Phonological phrases – Their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Tsimpli, I., & Sorace, A. (2006). Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena, In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceeding of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 653–664). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Venditti, J. J., Maekawa, K., & Beckman, M. E. (2008). Prominence marking in the Japanese intonation system. In S. Miyagawa & M. Saito (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 456–512). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua, 121, 577–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., & Xu, C. X. (2005). Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. Journal of Phonetics, 33, 159–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, M. (2008). Contrastive focus and emphasis. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55, 347–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, M., & Onea, E. (2011). Focus marking and focus interpretation. Lingua, 121, 1651–1670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. (1998). Prosody, focus, and word order. The MIT Press.Google Scholar