Cover not available
Article published In:
Sound, Form, and Meaning of Chinese Dialects
Edited by Ik-sang Eom
[Language and Linguistics 20:1] 2019
► pp. 85–130

Semantic constraint on preposition incorporation of postverbal locative PPs in Mandarin Chinese

| Hanyang University
| Nanyang Technological University
Other than subcategorized argument locative PPs (e.g. 放在桌子上 fàng zài zhuōzi-shàng ‘put on the table’), the postverbal position in Modern Mandarin Chinese can only be filled by limited types of adjunct locative prepositional phrases (e.g. 跳在桌子上 tiào zài zhuōzi-shàng ‘jump onto the table’). Among these postverbal adjunct locative PPs, only a small set of PPs permits the incorporation of the preposition into the preceding verb to form a V-P compound (“preposition incorporation”), yielding their previous prepositional object to surface as the object of the compound verb V-P. Previous studies claim that adjunct phrases which quantize an event, such as event delimiters, may behave like arguments (“the delimiter hypothesis”). Yet, our observations find that adjunct locative PPs that are not event delimiters (e.g. directional 向 xiàng/往 wǎng ‘toward’ PPs or non-directional 在 zài ‘at’ PPs) can also allow their prepositional object to appear as the verbal object. This thus calls for a modification of the widely-accepted delimiter hypothesis. We argue that the semantic characterization of the postverbal locative PPs permitting PI can be generalized as being associated with the denotation of a scalar result. Specifically, we understand result from the perspective of scale structure proposed in recent studies and argue that in addition to delimiting an event (that is, introducing a closed scale to the event from the scalar perspective), such PPs can also either add directional information (an open scale) to the event that they modify, or further specify scalar information for the event denoted by the VP. This work not only provides a unified analysis of most types of preposition incorporation that involve the postverbal locative PPs in Mandarin Chinese, but is also the first study that provides a comprehensive analysis of the scalar properties and functions of Chinese locative PPs. Our findings from the Chinese data will also contribute to the cross-linguistic semantic generalization of internal adjuncts and the domain of extended direct case assignment.
Keywords: postverbal locative PP, scale, internal adjunct, added argument, preposition incorporation, result, event delimiter, word order
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Background: Locative NPs appearing as the object of V-P compound and the delimiter hypothesis
    • 1.2Research question and hypothesis
  • 2.Scale and the scalar property of PPs
    • 2.1The notion of scale
    • 2.2Scalar attributes of PPs and their aspectual functions in event composition
      • 2.2.1Bounded PPs: Closed scalar PPs
      • 2.2.2Unbounded PPs: Nonscalar PPs and open scalar PPs
        • 2.2.2.1Nonscalar PPs
        • 2.2.2.2Open scalar PPs
  • 3.Locative PPs introducing a closed scale
  • 4.Locative PPs introducing an open scale
  • 5.Locative PPs further elaborating a scale
    • 5.1Only scale-denoting VPs allow the PI of the postverbal 在 zài PPs
      • Two-point closed scalar verbs
      • Incremental theme verb phrases
      • Open scalar verbs
      • Atypical manner-of-motion verbs
    • 5.2The external modification by preverbal 在 zài PPs and the internal modification by postverbal 在 zài PPs for scalar change VPs
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Sources
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 2 January 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00030.pec
References (76)
References
Bach, Emmon. 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and philosophy 9(1). 5–16.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beavers, John. 2008. Scalar complexity and the structure of events. In Dölling, Johannes & Heyde-Zybatow, Tatjana & Schäfer, Martin (eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, 245–265. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John & Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2012. Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3). 331–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Result verbs, scalar change, and the typology of motion verbs. Language 93(4). 842–876. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ping. 1988. Lun xiandai hanyu shijian xitong de sanyuan jiegou [On tripartite organization of the temporal system in Modern Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 61. 401–422.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4). 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, M. J. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Partee, Barbara Hall (ed.), Montague grammar, 261–292. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Pub. Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fan, Ganliang. 1990. “Xiang, wang, chao” jiqi xiangguan de jieci [Xiang, wang, chao and their related prepositions]. Yantai Daxue Xuebao [Journal of Yantai University] 41. 84–93.Google Scholar
Fan, Jiyan. 1982. Lun jieci duanyu “zai + chusuo” [On the preposition phrase zai + locative]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Studies in Language and Linguistics] 11. 71–86.Google Scholar
Fang, Xujun. 2004. “V xiang……” he “V wang……” [“V xiang……” and “V wang……”]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 21. 17–24.Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 2003. Prosodically Constrained Postverbal PPs in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 41(6). 1085–1122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2010. Verbs, constructions, and semantic frames. In Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Doron, Edit & Sichel, Ivy (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 39–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements.” In Mathews, Tanya & Strolovitch, Devon (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory IX, 127–144. Ithaca: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. New York: Garland Pub.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 411. 9–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Fred. 1983. Finnish grammar. Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate. 2000. Semantics. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 1999. Gradable adjectives denote measure functions, not partial functions. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29(1). 65–80.Google Scholar
. 2001. Polar opposition and the ontology of “degrees.” Linguistics and Philisophy 24(1). 33–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1). 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The composition of incremental change. In Demonte, Violeta & McNally, Louise (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, 103–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth. 2008. Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In McNally, Louise & Kennedy, Christopher (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse, 156–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2). 345–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Klipple, Elizabeth Mary. 1991. The aspectual nature of thematic relations: Locative and temporal phrases in English and Chinese. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Koenig, Jean-Pierre & Chief, Lian-cheng. 2008. Scalarity and state changes in Mandarin (and other languages). In Bonami, Olivier & Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia (eds.), Emprical issues in syntax and semantics 7, 241–262. (Paper presented at CSSP 2007, Paris, 4–6 October 2007.)
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Bartsch, Renate & van Benthem, J. F. A. K. & van Emde Boas, Peter (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Sag, Ivan A. & Szabolcsi, Anna (eds.), Lexical matters, 29–53. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 1998. The origins of telicity. In Rothstein, Susan (ed.), Events and grammar, 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamarre, Christine. 2007. Cong quxiang fanchou de fangyan biaoshu kan “shumian hanyuzhong de butong cengci” de panding [Spoken and written patterns in Standard Mandarin motion events]. Chuugokugogaku [Bulletin of the Chinese Language Society of Japan] 2541. 51–73.Google Scholar
. 2013. When lexicalization meets grammaticalization: The development of “wang+path” adverbials in Northern Chinese. In Cao, Guangshun & Chappell, Hilary & Djamouri, Redouane & Wiebusch, Thekla (eds.), Breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese linguistics and beyond, vol. 21, 887–909. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2010. Lexicalized scales and verbs of scalar change. (Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, 8–10 April 2010.)
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Jingxia. 2011. The encoding of motion events in Chinese: Multi-morpheme motion constructions. Stanford: Stanford University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
. 2016. Classification of Mandarin Chinese simple adjectives: A scale-based analysis of their quantitative denotations. Language and Linguistics 17(6). 827–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Feng-Hsi. 2009. Aspect and the postverbal zai phrase in Mandarin Chinese. In Xing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), Studies in Chinese linguistics: Functional approaches, 103–129. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Yuehua. 1998. Quxiang buyu tongshi [On directional complements]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu babai ci [Eight hundred words in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Beijia. 2002. Jindai Hanyu jieci [Prepositions in pre-modern Chinese]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2001. On the position and interpretation of locative modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 9(2). 191–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nam, Seungho. 2005. Directional locatives in event structure : Asymmetry between goal and source. Eoneohag: Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea 431. 85–117.Google Scholar
. 2012. Syntax-semantics mapping of locative arguments. Proceedings of the 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation, 473–480. Depok: Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2001. Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12(1). 47–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peck, Jeeyoung. 2008. The positional variation of prepositional phrases in Chinese: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Stanford: Stanford University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
. 2011. Modification of external event structure by preverbal NPs denoting duration and iteration. Junggukeo Munhak Nonjip [The Journal of Chinese Language and Literature] 691. 189–210.Google Scholar
Peck, Jeeyoung & Lin, Jingxia & Sun, Chaofen. 2013. Aspectual classification of Mandarin Chinese verbs: A perspective of scale structure. Language and Linguistics 14(4). 663–700.Google Scholar
Peck, Jeeyoung, & Lin, Jingxia & Sun, Chaofen. 2016. A scalar analysis of Chinese incremental theme VPs. In Eom, Ik-Sang & Zhang, Weijia (eds.), Language evolution and changes in Chinese (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 26), 216–246. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher J. 1993. Paths and their names. In Beals, Katherine & Cooke, Gina & Kathman, David & Kita, Sataro & McCullough, Karl-Erik & Testen, David (eds.), Papers from the 29th Reginal Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, vol. 21, 287–303. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41(1–3). 47–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2008. Lexicalized meaning and the internal structure of events. In Rothstein, Susan (ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, 13–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Doron, Edit & Sichel, Ivy (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 21–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rotstein, Carmen & Winter, Yoad. 2004. Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 12(3). 259–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Chaofen & Givón, Talmy. 1985. On the so-called SOV order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language 611. 329–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, James H-Y. 1975. On two functions of place adverbials in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 31. 154–179.Google Scholar
1984. Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. In Testen, David & Mishra, Veena & Drogo, Joseph (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics, 289–296. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2011. Zai lun shijian shunxu yuanze [On the temporal sequence principle again]. In Cui, Xiliang (ed.), Renzhi yufa yu duiwai Hanyu jiaoxue lunji [Collection of cognitive grammar and teaching Chinese as a second language], 65–85. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 31, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring, vol. 21. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Zhengda & Lamarre, Christine. 2007. A contrastive study of the linguistic encoding of motion events in Standard Chinese and in the Guanzhong dialect of Mandarin (Shaanxi). Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 2(1). 135–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teng, Shouxin. 1985. Hanyu dongci de shijian jiegou [The temporal structure of Chinese verbs]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 41. 7–17.Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol. 1994. Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tham, Shiao Wei. 2013. When motion and location yield direction: The case of Mandarin. In Cathcart, Chundra & Kang, Shinae & Sandy, Clare S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 344–358. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Huan. 1980. Zai shuoshuo zai [On zai again]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 31. 25–29.Google Scholar
Wang, Xiaoxi. 2004. Weishenme buneng shuo “rengwang dishang” [Why the phrase “rengwang dishang” unacceptable]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 41. 76–80.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen & Lee, Yae-Sheik. 1996. The domain of direct case assignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14(3). 629–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard & McEnery, Tony. 2004. Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xun, Endong & Rao, Gaoqi & Xiao, Xiaoyue & Zang, Jiaojiao. 2016. Dashuju beijingxia BCC yuliaoku de yanzhi [The construction of the BCC Corpus in the age of big data]. Yuliaoku Yuyanxue [Corpus Linguistics] 3(1). 93–109.Google Scholar
Yiu, Carine Yuk-man. 2014. Typology of word order in Chinese dialects: Revisiting the classification of Min. Language and Linguistics 15(4). 539–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Xin. 2002. Biaoshi fangxiang de “xiang, chao, wang” [An analysis of differences between xiang, chao, and wang]. Peixun yu Yanjiu: Hubei Jiaoyu Xueyuan Xuebao [Training and Research Journal of Hubei College of Education] 19(4). 21–23.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1981. “Zai heibanshang xiezi” ji xiangguan jushi [“Zai heibanshagn xiezi” and related structures]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 11. 4–18.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2005. A note on functional adpositions. In Broekhuis, Hans & Corver, Norbert & Huijbregts, Riny & Kleinhenz, Ursula & Koster, Jan (eds.). Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk Van Riemsdijk, 689–695. Berlin: Moutaon de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Lin, Jingxia
2021. Typological shift in lexicalizing motion events: The case of Wenzhou . Linguistic Typology 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Encoding Motion Events in Mandarin Chinese [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 11], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.