Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 20:3 (2019) ► pp.451–468

格西霍爾語動詞的時與體

| Yunnan Normal University
| Academia Sinica
霍爾語是四川境內較少人知的語群，屬於漢藏語系羌語支嘉戎語組。本文首度詳細介紹中部霍爾語格西話動詞的時－體範疇。保守的嘉戎語組語言，動詞均採「三分式」時－體系統，一般以方向前綴區別完整體與非完整體，以不同的詞幹標記過去與非過去時。相較於這種保守的形態格局，格西話動詞的時－體系統有數項重要的創新：（一）動詞詞幹交替大幅簡化，標註時間的功能基本喪失；（二）方向前綴從體標記轉成「相對過去時」標記，可通用的相對過去前綴də-開始逐步取代其他前綴，且有聚焦於動作結果的延伸功能；（三）以贅語式造出一般非完整體及「持續體」構造。這些重要的創新既源自內部衍變的機制，也明顯受到本地主流藏語的接觸影響。
Keywords: 嘉戎語組, 霍爾語群, 中部霍爾語, 動詞時−體系統, 語言接觸與創新
Article outline
  • 1.引言
  • 2.格西話時－體系統的特殊發展
    • 2.1動詞詞幹交替萎縮
    • 2.2體前綴轉變為相對時標記
    • 2.3新生贅語式非完整體
    • 2.4持續體
  • 3.前綴də-的特殊用法
    • 3.1作為通用過去時標記
    • 3.2標記情境的結果
  • 4.其他時－體的語意
  • 5.結語
  • 謝辭
  • 笔记
  • 參考文獻
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Article language: Chinese

Published online: 14 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00040.tia
References (21)
參考文獻
Bybee, Joan L. & Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1). 51–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 529–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gates, Jesse. 2013. Intelligibility, identity, and structure in Western rGyalrongic. (Talk presented at the 3rd Workshop on Sino-Tibetan Languages of Sichuan, Paris, 2–4, September 2013.)
Gengawengmu (根呷翁姆). 2010. Daofuyu diaocha (xia) 道孚語調查（下） [Investigations on Daofu language (Part 2)]. Sichuan Minzu Xueyuan Xuebao 四川民族學院學報 [Journal of Sichuan University for Nationalities] 19(4). 7–14.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2012. “Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Bufan (黃布凡). 1991. Daofuyu 道孚語 [The Daofu language]. In Dai, Qingxia (戴慶廈) (ed.), Zangmianyu shiwu zhong 藏緬語十五種 [Fifteen Tibeto-Burman languages], 1–45. Beijing: Beijing Yanshan Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. Lawurongyu yanjiu 拉塢戎語研究 [A study of Lavrong language]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume (向柏霖). 2008. Jiarongyu yanjiu 嘉戎語研究 [A study of the rGyalrong language]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2017. rGyalrong language. In Sybesma, Rint & Behr, Wolfgang & Gu, Yueguo & Handel, Zev & Huang, C. -T. James & Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol. 31, 583–589. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Lai, Yunfan & Antonov, Anton & Lobsang Nima. 2017. Stau (Ergong, Horpa). In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 597–613. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2015. The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3). 271–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 1999. Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? Linguistic Typology 3(1). 91–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, You-Jing. 2003. Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale [East Asian Languages and Linguistics] 32(2). 245–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2000a. Parallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics 1(1). 161–190.Google Scholar
2000b. Stem alternations in Puxi verb inflection: Toward validating the rGyalrongic subgroup in Qiangic. Language and Linguistics 1(2). 211–232.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. (孫天心). 2008. Caodeng Jiarongyu dongci de shi-te fanchou 草登嘉戎語動詞的時－體範疇 [Verbal tense-aspect categories in Caodeng rGyalrong], Hanzangyu Xuebao 漢藏語學報 [Journal of Sino-Tibetan Linguistics] 21. 135–146.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. (孫天心) & Shi, Danluo (石丹羅). 2002. Caodeng Jiarongyu yu “rentong dengdi” xiangguan de yufa xianxiang 草登嘉戎語與「認同等第」相關的語法現象 [Empathy hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong grammar]. Language and Linguistics 3(1). 79–99.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. (孫天心) & Tian, Qianzi (田阡子) & Chiu, Chenhao (邱振豪). 2017. Shangdonggu Huoeryu de fashengtai diuli 上東谷霍爾語的發聲態對立 [Contrastive phonation in Upper Donggu Horpa]. The Journal of Chinese Linguistics 45(1). 1–19.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Gates, Jesse P.
2023. Kinship terms in Stau. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 46:2 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.