Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 22:1 (2021) ► pp.167212


Austin, John L.
1962How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1971Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Biq, Yung-O.
1988From focus in proposition to focus in speech situation: cai and jiu in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 16(1). 72–108.Google Scholar
1995Chinese causal sequencing and yīnwèi in conversation and press reportage. In Bilmes, Leela & Liang, Anita C. & Ostapirat, Weera (eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special session on discourse in southeast Asian languages. 47–60. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephan C.
1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1982Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy, vol. 61, 35–53. Norwood: ABLEX Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
1984Integration and involvement in spoken and written language. In Borbe, Tasso (ed.), Semiotics unfolding: Proceedings of the second Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, Vienna, July 1979, 1095–1102. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, & Pander Maat, Henk
2003A contrastive study of Dutch and French causal connectives on the Speaker Involvement Scale. In Verhagen, Arie & van de Weijer, Jeroen (eds.), Usage-based approaches to Dutch: Lexicon, grammar, discourse, 175–199. Utrecht: LOT, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2006Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 17(3). 365–392.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1980Pragmatique linguistique: II. Essai d’application: Mais─les allusions à l’énonciation─délocutifs, performatifs, discours indirect [Application test: BUT –allusions to the utterance –talkative, performative, indirect speech]. In Parret, Herman (ed.), Le langage en context: Etudes philosophiques et linguistiques de pragmatique [Language in context: Philosophical and linguistic studies of pragmatics], 487–575. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eifring, Halvor
1995Clause combination in Chinese. Leiden: E.J.Brill.Google Scholar
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline
2005The development of Dutch connectives: Change and acquisition as windows on form-function relations. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen & Brunner, Hans & Whittemore, Greg
1991Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication 8(1). 8–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, Andy
2011Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock ’n’ roll). Los Angels: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Finegan, Edward
1987On the linguistic forms of prestige: Snobs and slobs using English. In Boardman, Phillip C. (ed.), The legacy of language: A tribute to Charlton Laird, 146–161. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
Fung, Pascale & Huang, Shudong & Graff, David
2005LDC2005S15/T32. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium ([URL]) (Accessed 2015-12-3) (Web Download.)
Glenn, Meghan & Lee, Haejoong & Strassel, Stephanie & Maeda, Kazuaki
2013–2015GALE Phase 3–4 Chinese Broadcast Conversation Transcripts LDC2013T08; 2014T28; 2015T09. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. ([URL]) (Accessed 2015-​12-1) (Web Download.)
Günthner, Susanne
1993 “… weil─man kann es ja wissentschaftlich untersuchen” ─Diskurspragmatische Aspekte der Wortstellung in WEIL-Sätzen [“… because –you can investigate it scientifically” –Discourse-pragmatic aspects of word order in WEIL sentences]. Linguistische Berichte [Linguistic Reports] 1431. 37–55.Google Scholar
Guo, Jimao
2008 “Yīnwèi suoyi” ju he “jìrán nàme” ju de chayi [A contrastive analysis between sentences with yīnwèi and jìrán ]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 2008(3). 22–29.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
2011Computer-mediated conversation, Part II: Introduction and overview. Language@Internet 8(2). ([URL]) (Accessed 2015-10-20).
Hole, Daniel P.
2004Focus and background marking in Mandarin Chinese: System and theory behind cái, jiù, dōu and yĕ. London: RoutledgeCurzon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan
2006Speech acts. In Brown, Keith. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn., 656–665. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Wenlong
1998 “Jiran p, jiu q” ju zhiyi [Questions on “Jiran p, jiu q” construction]. Guizhou Shifan Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) [Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Social Sciences)] 1998(4). 87–91.Google Scholar
Jin, Lixin & Du, Jiajun
2014 “Jiu” yu “cai” zhuguanliang duibi yanjiu [ Jiu and cai: A contrastive study of subjective quantity]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences] 13(2). 140–153.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul
1977Language evolution and speech style. In Blount, Ben G. & Sanches, Mary (eds.), Sociocultural dimensions of language change, 21–33. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi
1995The epistemic weil. In Stein, Dieter & Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 16–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knott, Alistair, & Sanders, Ted
1998The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics 30(2). 135–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1985Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In Haiman, John (ed.), Iconicity in syntax: Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24–26, 1983, 109–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levshina, Natalia
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1989Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berckley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Fang & Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline & Sanders, Ted
2013Subjectivity and result marking in Mandarin. Chinese Language and Discourse 4(1). 74–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Fang & Sanders, Ted & Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline
2016On the subjectivity of Mandarin reason connectives: Robust profiles or genre-sensitivity? In Stukker, Ninke & Spooren, Wilbert & Steen, Gerard (eds.), Genre in language, discourse and cognition, 15–50. Berlin: De Gruyter Mounton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Jinxia
2011 Lun “yóuyú” yu “yīnwèi” de chayi [On the differences between yóuyú and yīnwèi ]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese Teaching in the World] 25(4). 490–496.Google Scholar
Li, Jinxia & Liu, Yun
2004 “Yóuyú” yu “jìrán” de zhuguanxing chayi [The differences of yóuyú and jìrán in subjectivity]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2004(2). 123–128.Google Scholar
Liu, Chuqun
2002 “Yīnwèi” he “yóuyú” chayi chutan [A preliminary study on the difference between yīnwèi and yóuyú ]. Journal of Anhui Institute of Education 20(1). 89–92.Google Scholar
Liu, Yuehua & Pan, Wenyu & Gu, Wei
2001Shiyong xiandai Hanyu yufa (Zengding ben) [A practical grammar of modern Chinese (Expanded edition)]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lǚ, Shuxiang
(ed.) 1999Xiandai Hanyu babai ci (Zengding ben) [Eight hundred words of modern Chinese (Expanded edition)]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1982Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Jarvella, Robert J. & Klein, Wolfgang (eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics, 101–124. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Pander Maat, Henk, & Degand, Liesbeth
2001Scaling causal relations and connectives in terms of speaker involvement. Cognitive Linguistics 12(3). 211–245.Google Scholar
Pander Maat, Henk & Sanders, Ted
2000Domains of use or subjectivity? The distribution of three Dutch causal connectives explained. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Kortmann, Bernd (eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives, 57–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Subjectivity in causal connectives: An empirical study of language in use. Cognitive Linguistics 12(3). 247–273.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted
1997Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes 24(1). 119–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted & Spooren, Wilbert P. M. & Noordman, Leo G. M.
1992Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15(1). 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted & Sanders, José & Sweetser, Eve
2009Causality, cognition and communication: a mental space analysis of subjectivity in causal connectives. In Sanders, Ted & Sweetser, Eve (eds.), Causal categories in discourse and cognition, 19–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted & Spooren, Wilbert
2009Causal categories in discourse: Converging evidence from language use. In Sanders, Ted & Sweetser, Eve (eds.), Causal categories in discourse and cognition, 205–246. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Exceptions to rules: A qualitative analysis of backward causal connectives in Dutch naturalistic discourse. Text & Talk 33(3). 377–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Causality and subjectivity in discourse: The meaning and use of causal connectives in spontaneous conversation, chat interactions and written text. Linguistics 53(1). 53–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted & Sweetser, Eve
(eds.) 2009Causal categories in discourse and cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan
2003 Fuju san yu “xing, zhi, yan” [Complex sentences in three conceptual domains: Acting, knowing, and uttering]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2003(3). 195–204.Google Scholar
Song, Zuoyan & Tao, Hongyin
2009A unified account of causal clause sequences in Mandarin Chinese and its implications. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language” 33(1). 69–102.Google Scholar
Spooren, Wilbert & Sanders, Ted & Huiskes, Mike & Degand, Liesbeth
2010Subjectivity and causality: A corpus study of spoken language. In Rice, Sally & Newman, John (eds.), Empirical and experimental methods in cognitive/functional research, 241–255. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Stukker, Ninke & Sanders, Ted & Verhagen, Arie
2008Causality in verbs and in discourse connectives: Converging evidence of cross-level parallels in Dutch linguistic categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 40(7). 1296–1322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Baayen, Harald
2012Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2). 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1982From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann, Winfred Philipp & Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics, 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1). 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Stein, Dieter & Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Davidse, Kristin & Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–74. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1979Pragmatic connectives. Journal of Pragmatics 3(5). 447–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voiskounsky, Alexander E.
1997Telelogue conversations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2(4). ( DOI logo) (Accessed 2016-02-26.)Google Scholar
Walker, Kevin & Caruso, Christopher & Maeda, Kazuaki & DiPersio, Denise & Strassel, Stephanie
2013–2015GALE Phase 3–4 Chinese Broadcast Conversation Speech LDC​2013S04; 2014S09; 2015S06. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. ([URL]) (Accessed 2015-11-30) (DVD/Web Download.)
Wang, Chun-hui
2015 Tianjianju zhong de “na/name” [ Na/name in conditional sentences]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 2015(2). 41–48.Google Scholar
Wang, Yufang
2002The preferred information sequences of adverbial linking in Mandarin Chinese discourse. Text & Talk 22(1). 141–172.Google Scholar
Wu, Zhibiao
1995Mandarin Chinese News Text LDC95T13. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. ([URL]) (Accessed 2015-10-06) (Web Download.)
Xing, Fuyi
2001Hanyu fuju yanjiu [A study of Chinese complex sentences]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
2002 “Yóuyú” de yuyi pianxiang bian [On the semantic preference of the pattern introduced by yóuyú ]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinesee Language] 2002(4). 337–342.Google Scholar
Xun, Endong, Rao, Gaoqi, Xiao, Xiaoyue & Zang, Jiaojiao
(2016) Da shuju beijingxia BCC yuliaoku de yanzhi [The construction of the BCC Corpus in the age of Big Data]. Yuliaoku Yuyanxue [Corpus Linguistics] 3(1), 93–109.Google Scholar
Young, Linda W. L.
1994Crosstalk and culture in Sino-American communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
Zhao, Zongsa & Yao, Shuangyun
2016 Cong yuti shijiao kan “yīnwèi” “yóuyú” de chayixing [On the differences between yīnwèi and yóuyú from medium perspective]. Dangdai Xiucixue [Contemporary Rherotic] 2016(1). 62–71.Google Scholar
Zhong, Xiaoyong & Zhang, Lin
2013 “Jìrán” ju he “yīnwèi” ju zhuguanxing chayi tan [On the subjectivity differences between sentence jìrán and sentence yīnwèi ]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 2013(4). 35–40.Google Scholar
Zufferey, Sandrine
2012 “Car, parce que, puisque” revisited: Three empirical studies on French causal connectives. Journal of Pragmatics 44(2). 138–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Xiao, Hongling, Fang Li, Ted J. M. Sanders & Wilbert P. M. S. Spooren
2021.  Suǒyǐ ‘so’, they are different: an integrated subjectivity account of Mandarin RESULT connectives in conversation, microblog and newspaper discourse. Linguistics 59:4  pp. 1103 ff. DOI logo
Xiao, Hongling, Roeland W. N. M. van Hout, Ted J. M. Sanders & Wilbert P. M. S. Spooren
2021. A cognitive account of subjectivity put to the test: using an insertion task to investigate Mandarin result connectives. Cognitive Linguistics 32:4  pp. 671 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.