Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 22:2 (2021) ► pp.243271
Abe, Jun
1997The locality of zibun and logophoricity. In Inoue, Kazuko (ed.), Researching and verifying an advanced theory of human language (COE Research Report 1), 595–626. Chiba: Kanda University of International Studies. ([URL]) (Accessed 2020-09-25.)
Aikawa, Takako
2002 [1999]Reflexives. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 154–190. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph E. & Li, Yen-hui Audrey
2003Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of wh-constructions. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh
2002The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification. Natural Language Semantics 10(1). 43–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1993A Minimalist Program for linguistic theory. In Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (Current Studies in Linguistics 24), 1–52. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clements, George. N.
1975The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10(2). 141–77.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Thornton, Rosalind
1998Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki & Takano, Yuji
2000Nominal structure: An extension of the symmetry principle. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV (Linguistics Today 31), 219–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunji, Takao
2002Tango to bun no koozoo [Structures of words and sentences]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Hara, Takaaki
2001Anaphoric expressions in Japanese. Linguistics in the Netherlands 18(1). 113–125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Nobuko
1988Remarks on ‘zero pronominals’: In defense of Hasegawa (1984/85). In Tawa, Wako & Nakayama, Mineharu (eds.), Proceedings of Japanese Syntax Workshop: Issues on empty categories, 50–76. New London: Connecticut College.Google Scholar
Hoji, Hajime
1985Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese. Seattle: University of Washington. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Hoshi, Koji
2004Remarks on N-final relativization in Japanese. English Language and Literature 441. 113–147. Yokohama: Keio University.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James & Liu, C.-S. Luther
2001Logophority, attitude, and ziji at the interface. In Cole, Peter & Hermon, Gabriella & Huang, C.-T. James (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 33: Long distance reflexives, 141–195. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Ishii, Yasuo
1991Operators and empty categories in Japanese. Storrs: University of Connecticut. (Doctoral dissertation.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishizuka, Tomoko
2010Restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses in Japanese: Antisymmetric approach. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Kameyama, Megumi
1984Subjective/logophoric bound anaphor zibun. In Drogo, Joseph & Mishra, Veena & Testen, David (eds.), CLS 20: Papers from the 20th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 228–238. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1985Zero Anaphora: The case of Japanese. Stanford: Stanford University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Katada, Fusa
1988LF-binding of anaphors. In Borer, Hagit (ed.), WCCFL 7: Proceedings of the 7th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 171–186. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
1991The LF representation of anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry 22(2). 287–313.Google Scholar
Kim, Ji-Hye & Yoon, James H.
2009Local-distance bound local anaphors in Korean – An empirical study of the Korean anaphor caki-casin . Lingua 119(5). 733–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kishida, Maki
2011Reflexives in Japanese. College Park: University of Maryland. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Kitao, Yasuyuki
2009The nature of relativization: A minimalist perspective. Osaka: Osaka University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
2011The presence of head-raising and resumptive-stranding in Japanese relative clauses. Acta Linguistica Hungaria 58(3). 313–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Udo & Guntsetseg, Dolgor & von Heusinger, Klaus
2012Case in conflict: Embedded subjects in Mongolian. In Lamers, Monique & de Swart, Peter (eds.), Case, word order and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 40), 43–64. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1973The structure of the Japanese language (Current Studies in Linguistics 3). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1978Danwa no bunpoo [Grammar of discourse]. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
1997Noun-modifying constructions in Japanese: A frame semantic approach (Studies in Language Companion Series 35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, Noriko Akatsuka
1976Reflexivization: A transformational approach. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 5: Japanese Generative Grammar, 51–116. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morita, Hisashi
2013Optional movements derive Japanese relative clauses. US-China Foreign Language 11(9). 645–658.Google Scholar
Murasugi, Keiko
2000An antisymmetry analysis of Japanese relative clauses. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Law, Paul & Meinunger, André & Wilder, Chris (eds.), The syntax of relative clauses (Linguistics Today 32), 231–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, Masaru
1987Parameterized extension of binding theory. In Browning, M. A. & Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa & Ritter, Elizabeth (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 9: The 25th anniversary of MIT Linguistics, 193–223. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David
1972Evidence for shadow pronouns in French relativization. In Peranteau, Paul M. & Levi, Judith N. & Phares, Gloria C. (eds.), The Chicago which hunt: Papers from the Relative Clause Festival, a paravolume to papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 73–105. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A.
1992Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 23(2). 261–303.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1973Focus and relativization. Language 49(1). 19–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar