Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 24:2 (2023) ► pp.325–344

Old Chinese ‘egg’

More evidence for consonant clusters

| Kyoto University
This paper attempts to reconstruct the onset of the word for ‘egg’ in Old Chinese (OC). Based solely on Middle Chinese (MC), *rˤonʔ would be the default OC reconstruction. However, philological evidence such as a phonetic relationship (also called Xiéshēng connections), annotations, and variant characters show the relationship between the word for ‘egg’ and words with the velar onset in MC. (Interestingly, most of them belong to the so-called Division-II rhyme in MC.) In addition, comparative data from Proto-Min (*lh-), Proto-Hmong-Mien (*qr-), and Proto-Tai (*qr-) indicate the possibility of reconstructing the consonant cluster *k.rˤ- for the onset of the word for ‘egg’. In § 4, I shall provide some additional evidence from the excavated documents, such as oracle bone inscriptions 甲骨文, Chǔ bamboo slips 楚簡, and Qín bamboo slips 秦簡. In Chǔ bamboo slips, the characters having 䜌 luán as a phonetic element represent the words having onset *k-, such as 關 guān, 卷 juǎn, and 宦 huàn (seen in Ān Dà Jiǎn 安大簡, which is also categorized as Chǔ bamboo slips 楚簡). Furthermore, the character luán, which has 䜌 luán as an additional phonetic element, represents the word for ‘egg’ on Qín bamboo slips 秦簡. As noted above, the character 䜌 luán can represent the words having onset *k-. This all constitutes evidence supporting the reconstruction of the word for ‘egg’ with the initial consonant cluster *k.rˤ- in OC, confirming the reconstruction of T’ung-ho Tung (1944) and Baxter & Sagart (2014).
Keywords: Old Chinese (OC), Proto-Min, excavated documents, Chǔ bamboo slips
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Early studies
  • 2.Reconstruction based on philological evidence
  • 3.Reconstruction methods in Chinese linguistics
    • 3.1Reconstruction based on comparative evidence and loan words
    • 3.2Proto-Min
    • 3.3Proto-Hmong-Mien
    • 3.4Proto-Tai
  • 4.The characters for ‘egg’ in the excavated documents
    • 4.1Oracle bone inscriptions
    • 4.2Bamboo slips
    • 4.3 卝 guàn and 卵 luǎn
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 9 April 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00133.noh
References (41)
References
Akitani, Hiroyuki. 2008. Minbeiqu sanxian shi fangyan yanjiu [Studies on Northern Min Dialects: Shipi, Zhenqian, and Dikou] (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series A12-2). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 2011. Minyuzhong “laimu S- sheng” de laiyuan [Laimu > S- in Min dialects]. Yuyanxue Luncong [Essays on Linguistics] 431. 114–128.Google Scholar
Akitani, Hiroyuki & Nohara, Masaki. 2019. Shanggu chunhua yuanyin jiashuo yu Minyu [The rounded-vowel hypothesis in Old Chinese and Min dialects]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2019(1). 15–25.Google Scholar
Akitani, Hiroyuki & Wang, Weihui & Nohara, Masaki. 2022. Shuo “quan” [The etymology of the word ‘dog’ in Chinese]. In the Editorial board of Festschrift in honour of Professor Ray Iwata on his retirement (2022) (ed.), Festschrift in honour of Professor Ray Iwata on his retirement, 264–280. Tokyo: Geolinguistic Society of Japan. (21 vols.)Google Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent. 2014. Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William H. 1992. A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Paul K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. Archaic Chinese initial. In The Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong (ed.), Wang Li memorial volumes, 25–71. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing Co. (English volume1.)Google Scholar
Bhaskararao, Peri. 1996. A computerized lexical database of Tiddim Chin and Lushai. In Nara, Tsuyoshi & Machida, Kazuhiko (eds.), A computer-assisted study of South-Asian languages: Report no. 6, 27–143. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCAA), Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Peking University (ed.). 2003. Hanyu fangyin zihui [The lexicon of Chinese dialects]. 2nd edn. with re-arrangement. Beijing: Language and Culture Press.Google Scholar
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1957. Grammata serica recensa. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 291. 1–332.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei. 1971. Shangguyin yanjiu [Studies on archaic Chinese phonology]. Qinghua Xuebao [Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies] 9(1-2). 1–61.Google Scholar
Li, Rulong. 1983. Minxibei fangyan “lai” muzi du s- de yanjiu [A study of l- > s- in Northwestern Min dialects]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1983(4). 264–271.Google Scholar
Liang, Min & Zhang, Junru. 1996. Tongtaiyuzu gailun [An introduction of Kam-Tai languages]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Marrison, Geoffrey Edward. 1967. The classification of the Naga languages of North-East India. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. (Doctoral dissertation).
Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction (University of California Publications in Linguistics 135). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2008. The Tibeto-Burman reproductive system: Toward on etymological thesaurus (University of California Publications in Linguistics 140). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mei, Tsu-Lin & Norman, Jerry. 1971. Shilun jige Minbei fangyan zhong de laimu s- shengzi [Cl-> S- in some Northern Min Dialects]. Qinghua Xuebao [Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies] 9(1-2). 96–105.Google Scholar
Nohara, Masaki. 2018. Old Chinese “west”: *snˤər. Language and Linguistics 19(4). 577–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Gouni Shangguyin *Kr-: Yi An Da Jian “luan” wei li [The reconstruction of Old Chinese *Kr-: Based on the phonetic loan of luan in ‘An Da Jian’]. Shengyun Luncong [Bulletin of Chinese Phonology] 281. 97–114.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry. 1969. The Kienyang dialect of Fukien. Berkeley: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation).
. 1973. Tonal development in Min. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1(2). 222–238.Google Scholar
. 1982. The classification of the Shaowu dialect. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica 53(3). 543–583.Google Scholar
. 1995. A glossary of Herpyng dialect. Yuan Ren Society Treasury of Chinese Dialect Data 11. 107–126.Google Scholar
. 2005. Min fangyan zhong de laimuzi he zaoqi Hanyu [Lai initial words in Min dialects and Early Chinese]. Minzu Yuwen [Minority Languages of China] 2005(4). 1–5.Google Scholar
Ostapirat, Weera. 2014. Issues in the reconstruction and affiliation of Proto-Miao-Yao. (Paper presented at the 14th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics (IsCLL-14) & The 10th Anniversary of the Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 4–6 June 2014.)
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2009. The phonology of Proto-Tai. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctral dissetation).Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 2010. Hmong-Mien language history. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University).Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 1999. The roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The Chinese names of four directions. Journal of the American Oriental Society 124(1). 69–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuessler, Axel. 2007. ABC Etymological dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Shen, Ruiqing. 2011. Yetan Min xibei fangyan laimu du cayin xianxiang [New look on the Lai Mu puzzle: Northwestern Min fricatives versus Middle Chinese]. (Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (ILACL-19), Tianjin, 11–13 June 2011.)
Starostin, Sergej A. 1989. Rekonstrukcija drevnekitajskoj fonologičeskoj sistemy [Reconstruction of the phonological system of Old Chinese]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Tung, T’ung-ho. 1944. Shanggu yinyun biaogao [Tentative archaic Chinese phonological tables] (Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica Monographs Series A21). Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Unger, Ulrich. 1990. Die Armbrust und der steigende Ton [The crossbow and the rising tone]. Hao Ku [Sinological Circular] 361. 44–68.Google Scholar
Wang, Feng. 2006. Comparison of languages in contact: The distillation method and the case of Bai (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series B2). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Wang, Fushi & Mao, Zongwu. 1995. Miao-Yao yu guyin gouni [Reconstruction of the sound system of Proto-Miao]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Li. 1982. Tongyuan zidian [Dictionary of word families]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Weihui. 2007. “Shuoyuan” yu Xihan kouyu [ Shuoyuan and colloquial language]. Hanyushi Yanjiu Jikan [Studies on the History of Chinese Language] 101. 16–58.Google Scholar
. 2018. Hanyu hexinci de lishi yu xianzhuang yanjiu [The history and current state of core vocabulary in Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Zhou, Fagao. 1984. Zhongguo yinyunxue lunwenji [Papers in the study of Chinese phonology]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar