格西霍爾語的示證範疇
霍爾語群分佈於川西阿壩、甘孜兩州六個縣,屬於漢藏語系羌語支嘉戎語組。本文沿用並進一步闡釋Tournadre &
LaPolla對示證式的修正定義,系統介紹中部霍爾語格西話謂語的示證範疇。格西話採用零標記及三種後綴構成的「四元對立」示證體系。說話者報導敘實、自知、過去親歷、現場親察等情況時,對訊息有高度的掌握,無需添加任何示證標記;而三種示證後綴分別代表說話者掌握度較低的三類訊息,即現場察知的「新知」訊息、事後方知的「後知」訊息、以及二手轉知的「旁知」訊息。此外尚有兩種動詞成分可表達近似示證的語意,然而尚未充分語法化成為示證體系的一部分。格西話示證體系的形式與用法都有鮮明的特點,在霍爾語群中具有代表性。雖不能排除藏語示證模式的影響,但主要為自身發展形成的語法範疇。
Article outline
- 1.引言
- 2.格西話的示證體系
- 2.1零標記:深知示證
- 2.1.1敘實情境
- 2.1.2自知情況
- 2.1.3過去親歷親察情況
- 2.1.4親身參與的現場情況
- 2.2標記 -rə:新知示證
- 2.3標記 -gurə:旁知示證
- 2.3.1旁知示證的用法
- 2.3.2旁知示證標記的來源
- 2.4標記-sʰi:後知示證
- 3.表達類似示證語意的動詞成分
- 4.討論與總結
- 謝辭
- 笔记
- 縮寫對照表
-
參考文獻
References (45)
參考文獻
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (ed.). 2018. The
Oxford handbook of evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense
and aspect
systems. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. Evidentiality
and epistemic modality: Setting
boundaries. Southwest Journal of
Linguistics 181. 83–101.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Haan, Ferdinand. 2013. Semantic
distinctions of
evidentiality. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The
world atlas of language structures
(online). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL]) (Accessed 2021-02-13.)
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The
mirative and evidentiality. Journal of
Pragmatics 33(3). 369–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still
mirative after all these years. Linguistic
Typology 16(3). 529–564. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duo’erji (多爾吉). 1998. Daofuyu Geshizhahua
yanjiu 道孚語格什扎話研究. Beijing: China Tibetology Publishing House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, P. Jonathan & Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2016. Qiang. In Sybesma, Rint & Behr, Wolfgang & Gu, Yueguo & Handel, Zev & Huang, C.-T. James & Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia
of Chinese language and
linguistics, vol. 31, 517–526. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles. 1970. The
grammar of hitting and
breaking. In Jacobs, Roderick A. & Rosenbaum, Peter (eds.), Readings
in English transformational
grammar, 120–133. Waltham: Ginn.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fludernik, Monikas. 1991. The
historical present tense yet again: Tense switching and narrative dynamics
in oral and quasi-oral
storytelling. Text 11(3). 365–397.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, Nathan W. 2012. “Mirativity”
does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other
suspects. Linguistic
Typology 16(3). 389–433. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hintz, Daniel J. & Hintz, Diane M. 2017. The
evidential category of mutual knowledge in
Quechua. Lingua 186–1871. 88–109. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Honkasalo, Sami. 2017. Two
traditional Stau stories. Asian Highlands
Perspectives 441. 285–316.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Honkasalo, Sami. 2019. A
grammar of Eastern Geshiza: A culturally anchored
description. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. (Doctoral
dissertation.)
Huang, Bufan (黃布凡). 1991. Daofuyu 道孚語. In Dai, Qiangxia (戴慶廈) & Huang, Bufan (黃布凡) & Fu, Ailan (傅愛蘭) & Rig-'dzin Dbang-mo (仁增旺姆) & Liu, Juhuang (劉菊黃) (eds.), Fifteen Tibeto-Burman languages 藏緬語十五種, 1–45. Beijing: Beijing Yanshan Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, Bufan (黃布凡). 1991. Zangmianyu de qingtai
fanchou 藏緬語的情態範疇. Minority
Languages of China 民族語文 1991(2). 22–30.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2019. Egophoric
marking and person indexation in
Japhug. Language and
Linguistics 20(4). 515–534.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2021. A
grammar of
Japhug. Berlin: Language Science Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume & Lai, Yunfan & Antonov, Anton & Lobsang
Nima. Stau (Ergong,
Horpa). 2017. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The
Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd
edn., 597–613. New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiang, Di (江荻). 2005. Aspect, evidentiality and egocentricity in Lhasa
Tibetan 藏語拉薩話的體貌、示證及自我中心範疇. Linguistic Sciences 語言科學 4(1). 70–88.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lai, Yunfan. 2017. Grammaire
du khroskyabs de
Wobzi. Paris: Université Sorbonne Nouvelle-Paris 3. (Doctoral
dissertation.)
LaPolla, Randy J. & Huang, Chenglong. 2003. A
grammar of Qiang: With annotated texts and
glossary. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazard, Gilbert. 1999. Mirativity,
evidentiality, mediativity, or
other? Linguistic
Typology 3(1). 91–109. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, You-Jing (林幼菁). 2000.
Tense, aspect and modality inflection in the Zhuokeji
rGyalrong verbs
嘉戎語卓克基話動詞的時、體、與模態之屈折形態. Taipei: National Tsing Hua University. (MA
thesis.)
Lin, You-Jing (林幼菁). 2016. Jiarongyu Zhuokeji hua yufa biaozhu
wenben 嘉戎語卓克基話語法標注文本. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Danqing (劉丹青). 2008. A handbook for grammatical investigation and
research 語法調查研究手冊. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. The
bottom line: Chinese Pidgin
Russian. In Chafe, Wallace & Nichols, Johanna (eds.), Evidentiality:
The linguistic coding of
epistemology, 239–257. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prins, Marielle. 2016. A
grammar of rGgyalrong: Jiăomùzú (kyom-kyo) dialects: A web of
relations. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 1993. Evidentials
in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of
History and
Philology 63(4). 945–1001.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2017. Tshobdun
Rgyalrong. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The
Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd
edn., 557–571. New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2018. Evidentials
and
person. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of
evidentiality, 47–63. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2019. The
ancestry of Horpa: Further morphological
evidence. In Kong, Jiangping (ed.), The
Ancestry of languages and peoples of China (Journal
of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series
29) 24–43. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Jackson T.-S. To
appear. Pluralizing verbal reduplication in
Central Horpa. Bulletin of Chinese
Linguistics.
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Bstan’dzin Blogros. 2019. Tshobdun
Rgyalrong spoken texts with a grammatical
introduction. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Jackson T.-S. (孫天心) & Tian, Qianzi (田阡子). 2013. Verb agreement in Gexi
Horpa 霍爾語格西話動詞對協. Bulletin of Chinese
Linguistics 7(2). 203–223.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thiesen, Wesley & Weber, David. 2012. A
grammar of Bora: With special attention to
tone. Dallas: SIL International.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tian, Qianzi (田阡子) & Sun, Jackson T.-S. (孫天心). 2016. Verbal argument number marking via stem reduplication in the
Gexi Horpa 格西霍爾語動詞詞幹重疊形式數標記. Journal of Yunnan Normal
University (Humanities and Social
Sciences) 48(4). 15–21.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tian, Qianzi (田阡子) & Sun, Jackson T.-S. (孫天心). 2019. On tense and aspect in the Gexi Horpa
verb 格西霍爾語動詞的時與體. Language and
Linguistics 20(3). 452–469.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2017. A
typological sketch of evidential/epistemic categories in the Tibetic
languages. In Gawne, Lauren & Hill, Nathan W. (eds.), Evidential
systems of Tibetan
languages, 95–129. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whistler, Kenneth W. 1986. Evidentials
in Patwin. In Chafe, Wallace & Nichols, Johanna (eds.), Evidentiality:
The linguistic coding of
epistemology, 60–74. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Chi-fan (楊之帆). 2021.
The morpho-syntax of tense, aspect, evidentiality and modality
in Bawang Horpa
巴旺霍爾語時、體、示證、情態範疇的形態句法. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University. (Doctoral
dissertation.)