Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 25:1 (2024) ► pp.80–122

Sino-Tibetan *w in Tibetan and Old Chinese

| Wartburg College
From the perspective of Baxter’s (1992) Old Chinese (OC, which is generally followed by Schuessler 2009), the fate of a putative Sino-Tibetan (ST) *w in Tibetan and Old Chinese is quite straight-forward: In Tibetan *w was deleted everywhere in all environments; in word-initial position loss of *w‑ resulted in (smooth) vocalic onset, it is argued here that this feature is represented by the letter ’a-chung, e.g. ’oŋ ‘come’ from *waŋ; some such words have developed a new, or alternative, y-initial (e.g. yoŋ beside ’oŋ). Vocalic onset (with ’a-chung) is also the outcome of loss of other initial consonants (e.g. suffix ’u from bu). In Old Chinese *w survived only as part of labiovelars, in absolute word initial position (later Middle Chinese initial jwi̯-), and in configurations *hw‑ (voiceless *w), *ʔw‑ and *sw‑ (s-prefix). Drawn into the discussions are side-issues, like the elimination of *ɦ‑ from the Old Chinese phonemic inventory; OC final *-r metathesis, monophthongization in closed syllables, ST labiovelars, as well as a number of new etymologies. This paper confirms by and large the conclusions of Handel (2009) and Jacques (2013), but with some adjustments and elaborations.
Keywords: Old Chinese, Written Tibetan, ’a-chung , Sino-Tibetan *w , Tibetan wa ‘fox’, Sino-Tibetan ‘friend’
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Preliminaries
  • 2.Medial Sino-Tibetan/Tibeto-Burman *-w‑ in Written Tibetan and Old Chinese
    • 2.1Middle Chinese medial ‑w-/-u-
    • 2.2Medial *-w‑ after velar initials, followed by /i/: *Kwi(C)
    • 2.3Medial *-w‑ after non-velar initials, followed by /i/
    • 2.4Medial *-w- after velar initials, followed by /a/, /ǝ/ or /e/: *Kw-
    • 2.5Medial *-w‑ after non-velar initials, followed by /a/, /ǝ/ or /e/: *Twa(-), *Twǝ(-)
    • 2.6Monophthongization and metathesis in closed syllables
    • 2.7Tibetan wa-zur, suffix ‑a
  • 3.Initial ST *w- in Old Chinese
    • 3.1OC *ʔw‑ / *ʔu‑ from ST *w-?
  • 4.TB initial *w‑ in Written Tibetan
    • 4.1Vocalic onset in Written Tibetan
      • 4.1.1The Tibetan letter ʔa-chen
      • 4.1.2The letter ’a-chung
      • 4.1.3 ’a-chung as smooth vocalic onset
      • 4.1.4Velar and uvular fricatives for ’a-chung
      • 4.1.5 ’a-chung as vowel support and diacritic
      • 4.1.6Smooth vocalic onset (written with ’a-chung) resulting from loss of an initial consonant
    • 4.2WT initial ’a-chung after loss of TB or ST *w-
    • 4.3Initial WT y‑ as hiatus deleter in place of earlier w-
    • 4.4WT initial w‑ and the second deletion of w: wa ‘fox’ and ‘gutter’
  • 5.OC *gwr‑ vs. TB *grw-
  • 6.ST / TB ‑wa‑ / ‑wǝ‑ with complete loss of w in Tibetan
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 2 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00150.sch
References (77)
References
Baxter, William. 1992. A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William & Laurent Sagart. 2014. Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Paul K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beyer, Stephan V. 1992. The classical Tibetan language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Daniel Wayne. 2014. A phonological reconstruction of Proto-Central Naga. Berkeley: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Coblin, W. South. 1986. A sinologist’s handlist of Sino-Tibetan lexical comparisons (Monumenta Serica monograph 18). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag.Google Scholar
. 1991. A study of the Old Tibetan Shangshu paraphrase, Part I. Journal of the American Oriental Society 111(2). 303–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. An Old Tibetan variant for the word ‘fox’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 17(2). 117–118.Google Scholar
. 1995. Two notes on the London long scroll. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 58(1). 104–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. On certain functions of ’a-chung in early Tibetan transcriptional texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 25(2). 169–184.Google Scholar
. 2006. Two notes on Táng-time Tibetan transcriptions of Chinese. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 29(2). 137–139.Google Scholar
Coblin, W. South & Norman, Jerry. 1995. A new approach to Chinese historical linguistics. Journal of the American Oriental Society 115(4). 576–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Das, Sarat Chandra. 1902. A Tibetan-English dictionary. Kyoto: Rinsne Book Co. (Reprinted in 1969.)Google Scholar
Dempsey, Jakob. 2001. Remarks on the vowel system of old Burmese. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(2). 205–234.Google Scholar
. 2003. Analysis of Rime-groups in Northern-Burmish. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 26(1). 59–117.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan Paul. 2001. Introduction Qiang phonology and lexicon: Synchrony and diachrony. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, ILCAA.Google Scholar
French, Walter Thomas. 1983. Northern Naga: A Tibeto-Burman mesolanguage. New York: The City University of New York. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Goldstein, Melvyn. 1984. English-Tibetan dictionary of Modern Tibetan. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gong, Hwang-cherng. 1980. A comparative study of the Chinese, Tibetan, and Burmese vowel system. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology (BIHP) 51(3). 455–490. (Reprinted in Gong Hwang-cherng. 2002. Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics, 1–30. Taipei: Acadmia Sinica.)Google Scholar
. 1995. The system of finals in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. In Wang, William S-Y. (ed.), The ancestry of the Chinese language, 41–92. Berkeley: Journal of Chinese Linguistics. (Reprinted in Gong Hwang-cherng. 2002. Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics, 79–124. Taipei: Acadmia Sinica.)Google Scholar
. 2001. A reconstruction of consonant clusters with -r- and -l- as the second elements in Old Chinese and Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Humanitas Taiwanica 541. 1–36. (Reprinted in Gong Hwang-cherng. 2002. Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics, 183–211. Taipei: Acadmia Sinica.)Google Scholar
. 2002. Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics. Taipei: Acadmia Sinica.Google Scholar
Hahn, Michael. 1974. Lehrbuch der klassischen tibetischen Schriftsprache. Bonn: Indica et Tibetica Verlag.Google Scholar
Handel, Zev. 2009. Old Chinese medials and their Sino-Tibetan origins: A comparative study. Nankang: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan. 2005. Once more the letter ༢ (’a-čhung). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28(2). 107–137.Google Scholar
. 2006. Tibetan vwa ‘fox’ and the Sound Change Tibeto-Burman *wa〉Tibetan o . Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 29(2). 79–94.Google Scholar
. 2009. Tibetan 〈h-〉 as a plain initial and its place in Old Tibetan phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 32(1). 115–140.Google Scholar
. 2011a. An inventory of Tibetan sound laws. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 21(4). 441–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. Multiple origins of Tibetan o . Language and Linguistics 12(3). 707–721.Google Scholar
. 2014. Cognates of Old Chinese *-n, *-r, and *-j in Tibetan and Burmese. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 43(2). 91–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. The historical phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huáng, Bùfán (ed.). 1992. A Tibeto-Burman lexicon. Beijing: China Minzu University Press.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn & Tshering, Karma & Lhendrup, Kuenga & Chhophyel, Pema. 2016. Kurtöp/English/Dzongkha dictionary. (manuscript.)Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2009. Tibetan wa-zur and Laufer’s law. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 32(1). 141–144.Google Scholar
. 2013. On Pre-Tibetan semi-vowels. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 76(2). 289–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Fossil nominalization prefixes in Tibetan and Chinese. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 12(1). 13–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeschke, Heinrich August. 1954. Tibetan grammar. 4th reprinted edn. New York: Frederick Ungar Pub. Co. (Supplement by John L. Mish.)Google Scholar
. 1881. A Tibetan-English dictionary. London: Unknown.Google Scholar
Jaxontov, Sergej Evgen’evič. 1960. Fonetika kitajskogo jazyka 1 tysjačeletija do n. e. (labializovannye glasnye). Problemy Vostokovedenija 6. 105–115.Google Scholar
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1957. Grammata serica recensa. Stockholm: Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities.Google Scholar
Lalou, Marcelle. 1950. Manuel élémentaire de tibétain classique (methode empirique). Paris: Adrien Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei. 1971. Studies on archaic Chinese phonology. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 9(1–2). 1–61.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei & Coblin, W. South. 1987. A study of the Old Tibetan inscriptions. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Lorrain, James Herbsert. 1940. Dictionary of the Lushai Language. Culcutta: Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, George Byres. 1898. Dictionary of the Lepcha-Language. Berlin: Unger Brothers. (Revised and completed by Albert Grunwedel.)Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1985a. God and the Sino-Tibetan copula with some good news concerning selected Tibeto-Burman rhymes. Journal of Asia and Africa Studies (アジア・アフリカ言語文化研究) 291. 1–81.Google Scholar
1985b. Out on a limb: Arm, hand, and wing in Sino-Tibetan. In Thurgood, Graham & Matisoff, James A. & Bradley David (eds.), Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: The state of the art: Papers presented to Paul K. Benedict for his 71st birthday, 421–450. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
2000. An extrusional approach to *p-/w- variation in Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 1(2). 135–186.Google Scholar
2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2015. Sino-Tibetan etymological dictionary and thesaurus (STEDT). Berkeley: University of California. ([URL]).
2018. Rethinking the Proto-Tibeto-Burman *a- prefix: Glottal and nasal complications. Journal of Asian and African Studies (アジア・アフリカ言語文化研究) 961. 29–69.Google Scholar
Nagano, Yasuhiko. 1980. Amdo Sherpa dialect: A material for Tibetan dialectology (Monumenta Serica 7). Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Ostapirat, Weera. 2016. Issues in the reconstruction and affiliation of Proto-Miao-Yao. Languages and Linguistics 17(1). 133–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pān, Wùyún. 1997. Hòuyīn kǎo. Mínzú Yǔwén 1997(5). 10–24.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 2010. Hmong-Mien Language History. Pacific Linguistics, Canberra.Google Scholar
Roerich, George Nicholas de. 1958. Le parler de l’Amdo: Étude d’un dialecte archaïque du Tibet. Rome: Instituto italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 1999. The roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibeto-Burman reconstruction. By James A. Matisoff. Diachronica 23(1). 206–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2014. Language contact and the origins of the Germanic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schuessler, Axel. 1976. Affixes in Proto-Chinese. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
. 1987. A dictionary of early Zhou Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: Hawai’i University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Minimal Old Chinese and later Han Chinese. A companion to grammata serica recensa. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
. 2015. New Old Chinese. Diachronica 32(4). 571–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Metathesis and Monophthongization in Old Chinese Closed Syllables. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 151. 21–38.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devīdatta D. 1989. Tribal Languages of Himachal Pradesh, Part I. Delhi: Mittal Publications.Google Scholar
1992. Tribal Languages of Himachal Pradesh, Part II. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.Google Scholar
Shorto, Harry L. 2006. A Mon-Khmer comparative dictionary. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University. (Editor: Paul Sidwell.)Google Scholar
Simon, Walter. 1930. Tibetisch-chinesische Wortgleichungen ein Versuch. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 1986. Aspects of the phonology of Amdo Tibetan: Ndzorge śæme xɤra dialect (Monumenta Serindica 16). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, ILCAA.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 1988. Notes on the reconstruction of Proto-Kam-Sui. In Edmondson, Jerold A. & Solnit, David B. (eds.), Comparative Kadai: Linguistic studies beyond Tai, 179–218. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2013. The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Owen-Smith, Thomas & Hill, Nathan (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 105–130. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanBik, Kenneth. 2009. Proto-Kuki-Chin: A reconstructed ancestor of the Kuki-Chin languages (STEDT Monograph Series 8). Berkeley: Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project, Department of Linguistics research unit in University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Xú, Xījiān & Xiao, Jiacheng & Yue, Xiangkun & Dai, Qingxia (eds.). 1983. Jing Han zidian. Kunming: Yunnan Nationalities Publishing House. (Alternative title: Jinghpo Miwa ga ginsi chyum.)Google Scholar
Zhèngzhāng Shàngfāng. 2003. Shànggǔ yīnxì. Shànghǎi jiàoyù chūbǎnshè.Google Scholar