Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 18:3 (2017) ► pp.355–382

甘洛爾蘇話動詞的體貌範疇

| CRLAO, CNRS
| 西昌學院
本文通過語法問卷和長篇語料收集到的材料，以甘洛縣則拉鄉爾蘇話為例，對爾蘇語體貌系統的主要表達手段及其之間的關係進行了探討。本文確定了爾蘇語體系統的核心部分（即完整體與非完整體的對立）以詞彙和派生手段（動詞和動詞前綴）構成。本文指出爾蘇語較次要體的類型（如經驗體等）依靠語法形式手段（體貌標記）表達。本文發現爾蘇語大多數體標記兼表體與示證的意義。最後，本文分別介紹了體貌系統的主要表達手段和相關語料依據。
Keywords: 藏緬語族, 羌語支南支, 爾蘇語, 體範疇, 示證範疇
Article outline
  • 1.引言
  • 2.甘洛爾蘇話詞彙體
  • 3.甘洛爾蘇話語法體
    • 3.1/tɕʰí/：經驗體標記
    • 3.2/ǎ/：狀態轉變標記兼親見標記。/tsà/：非親見標記。
    • 3.3/ɡɛ́/：進行體標記
    • 3.4/sɛ́/：繼續或重複體
    • 3.5體貌助詞連用情況
    • 3.6以 /dʑì/「說」為基礎的傳聞標記
  • 4.結論
  • 謝辭
  • 筆記
  • 參考文獻
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 31 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.18.3.02chi
References (43)
參考文獻
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter. 2014. Towards an areal typology of prefixal perfectivization. Scando-Slavica 60.21: 384–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Ареальная типология префиксального перфектива (на материале языков Европы и Кавказа) [ An Areal Typology of Prefixal Perfectivization (based on the Languages of Europe and the Caucasus ]. Moscow: Языки Славянской Культуры [Jazyki Slavjanskoj Kul’tury].Google Scholar
Bradley, David. 2010. Evidence and certainty in Lisu. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 33.21: 63–83.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., & Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13.11: 51–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chirkova, Katia. 2012. The Qiangic subgroup from an areal perspective: a case study of languages of Muli. Language and Linguistics 13.11: 133–170.Google Scholar
Chirkova, Katia, Dehe Wang, Yiya Chen, Angélique Amelot, & Tanja Kocjančič Antolík. 2015. Ersu (Illustrations of the IPA). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 45.21: 187–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chirkova, Katia ( 齊卡佳), & Zhengkang Han ( 韓正康). 2017. Shiyong Douxuyu Yufa 實用多續語語法 [ Practical Grammar of Duoxu ]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Chirkova, Katia. 2016. Lizu (Ersu). The Sino-Tibetan Language (2nd edition), ed. by Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla, 823–835. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2000. The tense-aspect systems of European languages in a typological perspective. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Östen Dahl, 3–25. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickey, Stephen M. 2012. Orphan prefixes and the grammaticalization of aspect in South Slavic. Jezikoslovlje [Linguistics] 13.11: 67–98.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol. 2005. The participial construction of Dolakhā Newar: syntactic implications of an Asian converb. Studies in Language 29.11: 35–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms–Adverbial Participles, Gerunds, ed. by Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König, 1–55. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Bufan ( 黃布凡) , & Renzeng Wangmu ( 仁增旺姆). 1991. Lüsuyu 呂蘇語 [The Lüsu language]. Zangmianyu Shiwu Zhong 藏緬語十五種 [ Fifteen Types of Tibeto-Burman Languages ], ed. by Qingxia Dai ( 戴慶廈), Bufan Huang ( 黃布凡), Ailan Fu ( 傅愛蘭), Renzeng Wangmu ( 仁增旺姆) & Juhuang Liu ( 劉菊黃), 132–152. Beijing: Beijing Yanshan Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Jenny, Mathias. 2001. The aspect system of Thai. Aktionsart and Aspectotemporality in Non-European Languages: Proceedings from a Workshop Held at the University of Zürich, June 23–25, 2000, ed. by Karen H. Ebert & Fernando Zúñiga, 97–140. Zürich: Universität Zürich, Seminar für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
. 2015. NewSit-An “aspectual” category in SEA languages. Paper presented at the research seminar at CRLAO-EHESS, 24 June 2015. Paris: INALCO.
Johanson, Lars. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Östen Dahl, 27–187. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Li, Shaoming ( 李紹明), & Jungbo Liu ( 劉俊波) (eds.) 2007. Ersuzangzu Yanjiu 爾蘇藏族研究 [ Studies on the Ersu Tibetans ]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Youjing. 2003. Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale 32.21: 245–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Youjing ( 林幼菁), & Erwu Luo ( 羅爾武). 2003. Chabao Dazang rGyalrong de quxiang qianzhui ji dongci cigan bianhua 茶堡嘉戎語大藏話的趨向前綴及動詞詞幹變化 [ The directional prefixes and verb stem alternations in the Dazang rGyalrong dialect ]. Minzu Yuwen 民族語文 [ Minority Languages of China ] 2003.41: 19–29.Google Scholar
Lin, Youjing ( 林幼菁), Weibin Yin ( 尹蔚彬), & Zhi Wang ( 王志). 2014. Lizuyu zhudongci呂蘇語助動詞 [Auxiliaries in Lizu]. Minzu Yuwen 民族語文 [ Minority Languages of China ] 2014.21: 48–54.Google Scholar
Liu, Huiqiang ( 劉輝強). 2007. Ersuyu gaiyao 爾蘇語概要 [An outline of the Ersu language]. Ersuzangzu Yanjiu 爾蘇藏族研究 [ Studies on the Ersu Tibetans ], ed. by Shaoming Li ( 李紹明) & Jungbo Liu ( 劉俊波), 462–500. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. 2007. Sentences as combinations of clauses. Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Volume 2, Complex Constructions (2nd Edition), ed. by Timothy Shopen, 372–420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majsak, Timur A. 2005. Типология грамматикализации конструкций с глаголами движения и глаголами позиции [ A Typology of Grammatical Constructions with Verbs of Movement and Verbs of Posture ]. Moscow: Jazyki Slavjanskix Kul’tur.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 2007. Complementation. Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Volume 2, Complex Constructions (2nd Edition), ed. by Timothy Shopen, 52–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okell, John, & Anna Allott. 2001. Burmese/Myanmar Dictionary of Grammatical Forms. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Romeo, Nicoletta. 2008. Aspect in Burmese: Meaning and Function. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1990. Event types in Mandarin. Linguistics 28.21: 309–336.Google Scholar
1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Hongkai ( 孫宏開). 1982. Ersu (Duoxu) hua jianjie 爾蘇（多續）話簡介 [An introduction to Ersu (Duoxu) language]. Yuyan Yanjiu 語言研究 [ Studies in Language and Linguistics ] 1982.21: 241–264.Google Scholar
. 1983. Liujiang liuyu de minzu yuyan ji qi xishu fenlei 六江流域的民族語言及其係屬分類 [Minority languages of the six river valley and their genetic classification]. Minzu Xuebao 民族學報 [ Journal of Ethnic Studies ] 1983.31: 99–274.Google Scholar
. 2001. Lun Zang-mian yuzu zhong de qiangyuzhi yuyan 論藏緬語族中的羌語支語言 [On language of the Qiangic branch in Tibeto-Burman]. Yuyan ji Yuyanxue 語言暨語言學 [ Language and Linguistics ] 2001.2.11: 157–181.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T. S. ( 孫天心). 2008. Caodeng rGyalrong yu dongci de shi-ti fanchou草登嘉戎語動詞的時—體範疇 [Verbal tense-aspect categories in Caodeng rGyalrong]. Hanzangyu Xuebao 漢藏語學報 [ Journal of Sino-Tibetan Linguistics ] 2008.21: 135–146.Google Scholar
Tomelleri, Vittorio S., & Manana Topadze Gäumann. 2015. Aspectual pairs in Georgian: some questions. Language Typology and Universals 68.11: 49–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas, & Randy J. LaPolla. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality: issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37.21: 240–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vey, Marc. 1952. Les préverbes “vides” en tchèque moderne [“Empty” prefixes in Modern Czech]. Revue des Études Slaves [ Journal of Slavic Studies ] 29.11: 82–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Dehe ( 王德和). 2010. Ersuzangzu Wenhua Yanjiu 爾蘇藏族文化研究 [ A Study of the Culture of the Ersu Tibetans ]. Chengdu: Sichuan University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Sihong. 2013. A Reference Grammar of Ersu: A Tibeto-Burman Language of China. Townsville: James Cook University diseertation.Google Scholar