Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.341–365

Multimodality and the register of disciplinary History

Challenges for new texts and old theories

ORCID logo | University of New South Wales
While many aspects of disciplinary communication have been effectively illuminated by systemic functional linguistics, the ‘multimodal’ turn of communication requires some rethinking of old frameworks. In academic disciplines such as History, recent epistemological changes further highlight this need. From animations used by primary school students to doctoral theses, this paper draws on the systemic functional notion of register to explore how multimodal choices contribute to field, tenor and mode, just as linguistic choices do. Such multimodal examples may occur in forms which can be described as implicitly multimodal, explicitly multimodal or fully intersemiotic. All contribute to emerging forms of epistemology in the discipline and to new textual forms, with particular implications for educational practice.
Keywords: multimodality, register, systemic functional linguistics, history, thesis and dissertation writing, New Humanities, visualisation, field, mode, tenor
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Register as a framework
  • 3.History as a discipline
  • 4.Communication as a multimodal continuum
    • 4.1Inherent multimodality within History “writing”
    • 4.2Explicit multimodality in History “writing”
    • 4.3Complex multimodality in History: Intersemiosis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00014.rav
References (70)
References
Banks, David. 2008. The development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2017. The birth of the academic article: Le Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bateman, John. 2014. Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowcher, Wendy L. 2018a. The semiotic sense of context vs the material sense of context. Functional Linguistics, 5(5). [URL]. DOI logo
2018b. Multimodality and incorporating the non-linguistic in SFL theory: A focus on context of situation and register. Paper presented to the Third Halliday-Hasan Forum on Language, Shenzhen, November 2018.
Breuer, Franz. 2003. Subjectivity and reflexivity in the social sciences: Epistemic windows and methodical consequences. Forum qualitative sozialforchung/Forum: Qualitative social research [On-line Journal] 4(2). Retrieved December 2018, from [URL]. DOI logo
Caple, Helen. 2013. Photojournalism: A social semiotic approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: Reply to Ledin and Machin. Critical Discourse Studies. [URL]. DOI logo
Coffin, Caroline. 1997. Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school education. In Frances Christie & James R. Martin (eds.), Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, 196–230. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
. 2006. Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2009. Contemporary educational argumentation: A multimodal perspective. Argumentation 23(4). 513–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffin, Caroline & Beverly Derewianka. 2009. Multimodal layout in school history books: The texturing of historical interpretation. In Geoff Thompson & Gail Forey (eds.), Text-type and texture, 196–230. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Derewianka, Beverly & Caroline Coffin. 2011. Time visuals in history textbooks: some pedagogic issues. In Len Unsworth (ed.), Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education, 187–200. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Doughty, Peter, John Pearce & Geoffrey Thornton. 1971. Language in use (Schools Council Programme in Linguistics and English Teaching). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Doughty, Peter. 1972. Exploring language. (Explorations in language study). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne. 1994. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London & New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, James R. Martin & Peter Wignell. 1993. The discourse of history: Distancing the recoverable past. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice, 187–200. London & New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
2004. The language of science, volume 6 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Deakin: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Jillian. 2014. The voices of the exegesis: Composing the speech genres of the practitioner-researcher into a connective thesis. In Louise Ravelli, Brian Paltridge & Sue Starfield (eds.), Doctoral writing in the creative and performing arts, 369–388. Faringdon, Oxfordshire: Libri Publishing.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1995. The conception of context in text. In Peter Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic functional perspectives, 183–283. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Semantic networks. In Ways of saying: Ways of meaning. Edited by Carmel Cloran, David Butt & Geoff Williams. 104–131. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
He, Yufei. 2018a. A functional perspective on the semiotics of science animation. Paper presented to the Research symposium: Learning from viewing and creating animations in Science. Australian Catholic University, Sydney, November 2018.
. 2018b. Animate your research exploring the affordances of animation. Paper presented to the Second multimodality symposium: Researching visuals/visualizing research in the digital age: Multimodal insights. University of New South Wales, Sydney, December 2018.
Hodge, Bob. 1998. Monstrous knowledge: Doing Ph.Ds in the ‘new humanities’. In Allison Lee & Bill Green (eds.), Postgraduate studies: Postgraduate pedagogy, 113–128. Sydney: Centre for Language and Literacy, Faculty of Education, University of Technology.Google Scholar
Hood, Sue. 2010. Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2002. Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal 56(4). 351–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, Ros. 1998. Writing and identity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2005. Gains and losses: New forms of text, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition 5(22). 5–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2018. ICOM9 Plenary, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, 2018.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2006. Reading Images: The grammar of visual design. 2nd Edition. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999. Modelling context: A crooked path of progress in contextual linguistics. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 25–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Revisiting field: Specialized knowledge in secondary school science and humanities discourse. Onomázein Número Especial LSF y TCL sobre educación y conocimiento, 111–148. DOI logo. [URL]Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2007. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd edition). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. White. 2005. The Language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R., Karl Maton & Erika Matruglio. 2010. Historical cosmologies: Epistemology and axiology in Australian secondary school history discourse. Revista Signos: Eestudios de Lengua y Literatura 43(74). 433–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matruglio, Erika. 2007. Values and attitudes in ancient and modern history. In Bridging discourses: ASFLA 2007 online proceedings, 1–17. Australia: ASFLA.Google Scholar
. 2010. Evaluative stance in humanities: Expectations and performances. In Ahmar Mahboob & Naomi Knight (eds.), Appliable linguistics, 168–184. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Myskow, Gordon. 2018. Calibrating the ‘right’ values: The role of critical inquiry tasks in social studies textbooks. Visual Communication 18(1). 31–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Curriculum Board. 2009. National history curriculum: Framing paper. [URL] Accessed November 1, 2017.
O’Halloran, Kay L. 2003. Intersemiosis in mathematics and science: Grammatical metaphor and semiotic metaphor. In Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Miriam Taverniers & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics, 337–365. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Systemic-functional multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication 7(4). 443–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oteíza, Teresa. 2003. How contemporary history is presented in Chilean middle school textbooks. Discourse & Society 14(5). 639–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oteíza, Teresa, Rodrigo Henríque & Claudio Pinuer. 2015. History classroom interactions and the transmission of the recent memory of human rights violations in Chile. Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society 7(2). 44–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oteíza, Teresa & María E. Merino. 2012. Am I a genuine Mapuche? Tensions and contradictions in the construction of ethnic identity in Mapuche adolescents from Temuco and Santiago. Discourse and Society 23(3). 297–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oteíza, Teresa & Derrin Pinto. 2008. Agency, responsibility and silence in the construction of contemporary history in Chile and Spain. Discourse and Society 19(3). 333–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oteíza, Teresa & Claudio Pinuer. 2016. De/legitimation of historical memories: Appraisal in intermodal pedagogical discourse of Chilean primary education. Revista signos. Estudios de Linguistica 49(92). 377–402.Google Scholar
Painter, Clare, James R. Martin & Len Unsworth. 2013. Reading visual narratives: Image analysis of children’s picture books. Equinox: Sheffield.Google Scholar
Poynton, Cate. 1985. Language and gender: Making the difference. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Ravelli, Louise. 2018. Multimodal English. In Philip Seargeant, Ann Hewings & Stephen Pihlaja (eds.). Routledge handbook of English Language studies, 434–466. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravelli, Louise J. 2000. Beyond shopping: Constructing the Sydney Olympics in three-dimensional text. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 20(4). 489–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravelli, Louise J. & Robert J. McMurtrie. 2016. Multimodality in the built environment: Spatial discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ravelli, Louise & Sue Starfield. 2008. Typography and disciplinary identity in academic writing. Information Design Journal 161. 133–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Royce, Terry. 2007. Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In Terry Royce & Wendy L. Bowcher (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 63–110. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sawaki, Tomoko. 2014. Construing stance in History theses: Dynamic interactions among ideology, generic structure, and engagement. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of the Arts and Media, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
. 2016. Analysing structure in academic writing. London: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary. 2004. The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starfield, Sue & Louise Ravelli. 2006. The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist: Self and structure in New Humanities research theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51. 222–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stern, Steven. 2006. Remembering Pinochet’s Chile: On the eve of London 1988. North Carolina: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Ramona & Suganthi Johns. 1999. The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person. English for Specific Purposes 181. S23–S39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, Len. 2001. Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 1998. Taste in the framework of the semiotics of materiality. In Ann Piroëlle (ed.), La représentation sociale du goût, 149–162. Dijon: PRIsM.Google Scholar
. 2011. Multimodality. In Simpson James (ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics, 668–682. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Mendioroz Lacambra, Ana María, Maite López-Flamarique & Alfredo Asiáin-Ansorena
2022. Entrevista histórico-etnográfica. Perfiles Educativos 44:177 ► pp. 130 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.