Reply published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.393400
References (20)
References
Athanasopoulos, Panos & Emanuel Bylund. 2013. Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science 37 (2). 286–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bloor, Thomas & Meriel Bloor. 2004. The functional analysis of English, (2nd edition) London: Hodder Arnold. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera. 2001. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43 (1). 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul & Christina Schäffner. 2002. Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In Paul Chilton & Christina Schäffner (eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytical approaches to political discourse, 1–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Marquez, Monica, Iren Mittelberg, Seana Coulson & Michael J. Spivey (eds.) 2007. Methods in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2002. How do you mean? On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 352–368. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, (3rd edition) London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
. 2006. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. (4th edition). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2014. Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle. 2019. Review of Christopher Hart Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives . Language, Context and Text 1(1). 194–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matlock, Teenie & Winter Bodo. 2015. Experimental semantics. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, (2nd edition), 771–790. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Origgi, Gloria & Dan Sperber. 2000. Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. In Peter Carruthers & Andrew Chamberlain (eds.), Evolution and the human mind: Modularity, language and meta-cognition, 140–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna, Massey, Christine & Gleitman, Lila. 2002. Shake, rattle ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84 (2). 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna & Stathis Selimis. 2010. Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and Cognitive Processes 25 (2). 224–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2004. Introducing functional grammar. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar