Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish casual conversation
A contrastive study
This paper uses a trinocular approach – i.e. from below, from above and from roundabout – to describe Theme as point of departure (POD) in English and Spanish casual conversation (thus avoiding the more controversial ‘what-the-clause-is-about’ aspect of Theme). This research is part of a long-term contrastive study which includes the description of POD in academic writing and a crosslinguistic comparison of POD in academic writing and casual conversation. Among the main findings in this paper, the following stand out: (a) the identification of a conversational texture characterised by the interplay of textual and interpersonal strands of meaning; and (b) different POD arrangements of English and Spanish clauses in casual conversation, motivated by different ways of enacting communicative exchange.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and methodology
- 3.The view from below: Realisations of POD in casual conversation
- 4.The view from above: Functions of POD in casual conversation
- 5.The view from roundabout
- 5.1Threads of meaning in casual conversation
- 5.2Thematic progression in casual conversation
- 6.Conclusion and pointers to the future
- Notes
-
References
References (71)
References
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio. 1987. Estudios de gramática funcional del español (3rd edition). Madrid: Gredos.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andreau, Laura. 2020. Verbos derivados de saber y decir como marcadores discursivos en fragmentos descriptivos de la conversación coloquial. In Lucas Gagliardi, Dolores Álvarez Garriga & Lucía Zanfardini (eds.), Punto de encuentro: Estudios sobre el lenguaje, 211–232. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arús-Hita, Jorge. 2004. Understanding ‘how we mean’ through discourse analysis: A contrastive example using systemic-functional grammar. In Marta Carretero, Honesto Herrera-Soler, Gitte Kristiansen & Julia Lavid (eds.), Estudios de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación, 29–64. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arús-Hita, Jorge. 2010. On Theme in English and Spanish: A comparative study. In Elisabeth Swain (ed.), Thresholds and potentialities of systemic functional linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specialised discourses, 23–48. Trieste: Edizioni Universita di Trieste.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arús-Hita, Jorge. 2017. Theme in Spanish. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 194–212. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arús-Hita, Jorge. 2021. Pushing SFL out of its comfort zone: The role of SPCA structure in English and Spanish. Lingua 2611. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arús-Hita, Jorge. In press. A contrastive look at Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish academic writing. English Text Construction.
Arús-Hita, Jorge, Julia Lavid & Lara Moratón. 2013. Annotating thematic features in English and Spanish: A contrastive corpus-based study. In Maite Taboada, Susana Doval Suárez & Elisa González Álvarez (eds.), Contrastive discourse analysis: Functional and corpus perspectives, 164–182. London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Briz Gómez, Antonio. 2001. El español coloquial en la conversación. Barcelona: Ariel.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chela-Flores, Bertha & Godsuno Chela-Flores. 2013. Intonation and sentence focus in English and Spanish: Implications for teaching. The Modern Language Society of Helsinki 104 (3). 328–338.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, Florence. 1997. Marked Theme as a heuristic for analysing text-type, text and genre. In Jordi Piqué & David J. Viera (eds.), Applied linguistics: Theory and practice in ESP, 45–79. Valencia: Universitat de València.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, Mark. 2004–. BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). [URL]
Downing, Angela. 1991. An alternative approach to theme: A systemic-functional perspective. Word 42 (2). 119–143. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dubois, Betty Lou. 1987. A reformulation of thematic progression typology. Text 7 (2). 89–116.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd edition). New York & London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade. 1997. Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firbas, Jan. 1966. On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 11. 267–280.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firbas, Jan. 1992. Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flores Figueroa, Claudia. 2005. Análisis sistémico-funcional de la estructura de conversaciones en inglés y en español. Unpublished MA dissertation, Universidad de Chile.
García, Adolfo M. & José M. Gil. 2011. Una perspectiva sistémico-funcional del español: Acerca de la multifuncionalidad en la cláusula castellana simple. Revista de Investigación Lingüística 141. 191–214.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gil, José M. & Adolfo M. García. 2010. Transitividad, modo y tema en español: Un primer análisis en términos de la gramática de Cardiff. Revista Signos 43 (72). 71–98. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Granato, Luisa & Guillermina Piatti. 2010. Some remarks on thematic and information structure in casual conversation. In Proceedings of V coloquio argentino de la IADA, 157–168. La Plata, Argentina.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1989. Spoken and written language (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1996. On grammar and grammatics. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David Butt (eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory into practice, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1985. Linguistics, language and verbal art. Geelong: Deakin University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, Rodney D. 1988. Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalization in Halliday’s functional grammar. Journal of Linguistics 241. 137–174. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, Rodney D. 1991. Further remarks on Halliday’s functional grammar: A reply to Matthiessen and Martin. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 51. 75–130.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hudson, Richard. 1986. Systemic grammar. Linguistics 241. 791–815.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Knight, Naomi K. 2010. Laughing our bonds off: Conversational humour in relation to affiliation. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
Laboratorio de Lingüística Informática. 1992. CORLEC, Corpus Oral de Referencia del Español Contemporáneo. Departamento de Lingüística, Lenguas Modernas, Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arús-Hita & Juan R. Zamorano. 2010. Systemic functional grammar of Spanish: A contrastive study with English. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arús-Hita & Lara Moratón. 2012. Signalling genre through Theme: The case of news reports and commentaries. Discourse 10. Special issue on multidisciplinary approaches to signalling text organisation, 1–45.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linlong, Yu & Yu Haiyang. 2016. On texture and its theoretical positioning. Proceedings of the 2016 Northeast Asia International Symposium on Linguistics, Literature and Teaching. Las Vegas: New Vision Press, 11–15.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lucantonio, Damian. 2007. Developing diversity in oral communication. Bulletin of the University of Electro-Communications 20 (1–2). 55–66.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, James R. 1993. Genre and literacy – modelling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 131. 141–172. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, James R. 1995. More than what the clause is about: English Theme. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts, 223–258. London: Pinter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, James R. 2010. Semantic variation – modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiotics. In Monika Bednarek & James R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity and affiliation, 1–34. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, James R. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1992. A brief note on Huddleston’s reply to Matthiessen and Martin’s response to Huddleston’s review of Halliday’s Introduction to functional grammar
. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 61. 185–195.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1995. Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2004. Descriptive motifs and generalizations. In Alice Caffarel, James R. Martin & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen (eds.), Language typology: A functional perspective, 537–673. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & James R. Martin. 1991. A response to Huddleston’s review of Halliday’s Introduction to functional grammar
. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 51. 5–74.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Diana Slade. 2010. Analysing conversation. In Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone & Paul Kerswill (eds.), The Sage handbook of sociolinguistics, 375–395. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore & Washington DC: SAGE.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montemayor-Borsinger, Ann. 2009. Tema: Una perspectiva funcional de la organización del discurso. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moyano, Estela. 2021. La función de Tema en español: Sus medios de realisación desde la perspectiva trinocular de la Lingüística Sistémico-Funcional. Revista Signos 56 (106). 487–517. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mwinlaaru, Isaac N. & Wilfred W. Xuan. 2016. A survey of studies in systemic functional language description and typology. Functional Linguistics 3 (8). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Narbona Jiménez, Antonio. 2015. Sintaxis del español coloquial. Sevilla: Editorial Universidad de Sevilla. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ozaki, Shizuko. 2010. Subjectless sentences in English. Journal of Nagoya Bunri University 101. 35–46.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Piatti, Guillermina. 2020. Oralidad y sintaxis. In Lucas Gagliardi, Dolores Álvarez Garriga & Lucía Zanfardini (eds.), Punto de encuentro: Estudios sobre el lenguaje, 121–153. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ping, A. Leong. 2005. Talking themes: The thematic structure of talk. Discourse Studies 7 (6). 701–732. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quiroz, Beatriz. 2008. Towards a systemic profile of the Spanish mood
. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 4 (1). 31–65.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne Marie. 2014. Systemic-functional approaches to discourse. In Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds.), Pragmatics of discourse, 125–164. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slade, Diana. 1996. The texture of casual conversation in English. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing functional grammar (3rd edition). London & New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Geoff & Susan Thompson. 2009. Theme, subject and the unfolding of text. In Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture, 45–69. Sheffield: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tucker, Gordon. 2005. Extending the lexicogrammar: Towards a more comprehensive account of extraclausal, partially clausal and non-clausal expressions in spoken discourse. Language Sciences 27 (6). 679–709. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valenzuela Farías, M. Gabriela. 2013. A comparative analysis of intonation between Spanish and English speakers in tag questions, wh-questions, inverted questions, and repetition questions. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 13 (4): 1061–1083. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Val.Es.Co. 1996 [1994]. Corpus de conversación coloquial – Universidad de Valencia/ Universidad de Alicante.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ventola, Eija. 1979. The structure of casual conversation in English. Journal of Pragmatics 3 (3–4). 267–298. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weil, Henri. 1844. De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Didier Érudition.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
O’Grady, Gerard
2023.
Theme in spoken language: when a tone group is not a clause.
Journal of World Languages 0:0
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.