Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 8:2 (2018) ► pp.209234
References (49)


Anscombre, Jean-Claude and Oswald Ducrot
1983L’argumentation dans la langue. Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga.Google Scholar
. Rhetoric Translated by W. Rhys Roberts ed. by W. D. Ross. Cover copyright by Cosimo Classics. New York 2010 (originally published in The Works of Aristotle, vol. IX1, ed. by W. D. Ross. London: Oxford University Press, 1910–1931).Google Scholar
Bayley, Paul
2004 “Introduction. The Whys and Wherefores of Analysing Parliamentary discourse. Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 1–44. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breton, Philippe
2003L’argumentation dans la communication. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Charles, David
(ed) 2010Definition in Greek Philosophy. Oxford. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 251: 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Impoliteness strategies”. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 421–445. Cham/Heidelberg/New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1984 “Esquisse d’une théorie polyphonique de l’énonciation.” In Le dire et le dit, ed. by Oswald Ducrot, 171–233. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
1991Dire et ne pas dire. Principes de sémantique linguistique. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Hestir, Blake E.
2016Plato on the Metaphysical Foundation on Meaning and Truth. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohmann, Hans
2000 “Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives.” Argumentation 14(3): 223–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2003 “Histrionic and Agonistic Features of Parliamentary Discourse”. Studies in Communication Sciences 3(1): 25–53.Google Scholar
2006 “Parliamentary Discourses.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Keith Brown. 2nd edition, vol. 91, 188–197. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Strategies of Refutation by Definition. A Pragma-Rethorical Approach to Refutations in a Public Speech.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 35–51. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed) 2010a “Introduction.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, 1–25. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010b “Managing dissent and interpersonal relations in the Romanian parliamentary discourse.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, 193–22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana
2012 “The Historicity of Democracy.” In Parliamentary Discourses across Cultures: Interdisciplinary Approaches, ed. by Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Melania Roibu, and Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu, 197–208. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2005Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kublikowski, Robert
2009 “Definition within the Structure of Argumentation.” Studies in Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric 16(29): 229–244.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Macagno, Fabrizio
2008 “The Dialectical-Dialogical Definitions.” L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria XVI(1): 443–461.Google Scholar
2010 “Definitions in Law.” Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée 21: 199–217.Google Scholar
2014 “Presupposing Redefinitions.” In Rhetoric and Cognition. Theoretical Perspectives and Persuasive Strategies, ed. by Thierry Herman, and Steve Oswald, 249–278. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Macagno, Fabrizio and Walton Douglas
2008 “Persuasive Definitions: Values, Meanings and Implicit Disagreements.” Informal Logic 28(3): 203–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macagno, Fabrizio and Giovanni Damele
2015 “The Hidden Acts of Definition in Law: Statutory Definitions and Burden of Persuasion.” In Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking, ed. by Michał Araszkiewicz and Krysztof Płeszka, 225–251. Cham/Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1971The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Translated by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame/London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2015 “Split Voices in Political Discourse.” Language and Dialogue 5(3): 430–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiappa, Edward
1993 “Arguing about Definitions.” Argumentation 7(4): 403–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 “Toward a Pragmatic Approach to Definition: ’Wetlands’ and the politics of meaning.” In Environmental Pragmatics, ed. by Andrew Light and Eric Katz, 209–230. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2003Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena
2008Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
1981 “Irony and the Use – Mention Distinction.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Charles L.
1938 “Persuasive Definitions.” Mind 47(187): 331–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Treimane, Laura
2011 “Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse: Systemic Functional Perspective”. Kalbotyra 63(3): 78–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2004 “Text and Context of Parliamentary Debates.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 339–372. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas
2001 “Persuasive Definitions and Public Policy Arguments.” Argumentation and Advocacy 371: 117–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas and Fabrizio Macagno
2011 “Quotations and Presumptions: Dialogical Effects of Misquotations.” Informal Logic 31(1): 27–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2009 “The Dialogic Principle Revisited: Speech Acts and Mental States.” In Language as Dialogue, ed. by Sebastian Feller, 21–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yule, George
1996Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zarefsky, David
1998 “Definitions.” In Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and Critiques, ed. by James Klumpp, 1–11. Annandale, VA: National Communication Association.Google Scholar
2004 “Presidential Rhetoric and the Power of Definitions”. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34(3): 607–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric.” Argumentation 20(4): 399–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays by David Zarefsky, New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar


Camera Deputaților a Parlamentului României
Recorded Parliamentary debates) [URL]
= Petre P. Carp 2000Discursuri parlamentare [1909], Bucureşti: Grai şi Suflet. Cultura Naţională.Google Scholar
= Titu Maiorescu 2006Opere, III, Discursuri parlamentare (1866–1899). Fundaţia Naţională pentru Ştiinţă şi Artă, Bucureşti: Univers Enciclopedic.Google Scholar
The United Kingdom Parliament Home Page
Hansard records): [URL]