Cover not available
Discussion published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 8:2 (2018) ► pp.289–305
Discussion articles

The theory myth

 | University of Münster (Germany)
First of all, I would like to make clear that this paper is meant as a response to the attack against the Mixed Game Model (Weigand 2010) launched by Harrissians in their articles of the Special Issue of this journal (2018, 1). When I became aware of the fact that against their dogmatic position no argument can take effect, I decided not to take part directly in such a pseudo-debate but to respond in a discussion article in the next issue (see the preface of the special issue). I am writing this discussion article not in the futile hope of changing the minds of Harrissian hardliners, but because I feel obliged to the other contributors of the Special Issue who made a plea for the MGM. Moreover, I feel obliged to the readers of this journal to defend my position regarding basic issues of linguistics. I’ll focus on central points and refer to my book on “Dialogue: The Mixed Game” for details.
Keywords: integrationism, integration, Mixed Game Model, theory, dialogue, rhetoric, sign
Article outline
  • 1.‘Integration’ at the centre
  • 2.Distorted concepts
  • 3.The ‘theory myth’
  • 4.Rhetorical devices
  • 5.The touchstone of examples
  • 6.Systematizing the puzzle
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 12 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00016.wei
References (35)
References
Arnett, Ronald C. 2017. “Communicative Ethics: The Phenomenological Sense of Semioethics.” Language and Dialogue 7(1): 80–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 1997. “Necessary Coupling. Review of Harris’s ‘The Language Connection: Philosophy and Linguistics’ and ‘The Origin of Language’.” The Times Higher Education Supplement, 6 June 1997: 221.Google Scholar
Duncker, Dorthe. 2018. “Sign Making in Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue 8(1): 139–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feynman, Richard P. 2001. The Pleasure of Finding Things out. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy. 1990. “The Integrationist Critique of Orthodox Linguistics.” In The Sixteenth LACUS Forum 1989, ed. by Michael P. Jordan. Lake Bluff, Il. LACUS.Google Scholar
. 1996. Signs, Language and Communication. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Performatives.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 1995. “The ‘Language Myth’ Myth; or Roy Harris’s Red Herrings.” In Linguistics Inside Out: Roy Harris and his Critics, ed. by Nigel Love and George Wolf, 9–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2003. “Orthodox Unorthodoxy.” Language Sciences 251: 99–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, István. 2017. “From Pragmatics to Dialogue”. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 78–92. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackay, Rowan R. 2016. “Goodish: Integrating Integrationism. Review Article of Signs, Meaning and Experience: Integrational Approaches to Linguistics and Semiotics, ed. by Adrian Pablé and Christopher Hutton. Boston/Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015. Language & Communication 471: 89–93.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2017. “Dialogue, Dialogicality and Interactivity: A Conceptually Bewildering Field?” Language and Dialogue 7(3): 301–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linsky, Leonard (ed.). 1952. Semantics and the Philosophy of Language. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lumsden, Charles J. and Edward O. Wilson. 2005. Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. New Jersey: World Scientific. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lund, Søren. 2012. “On Professor Roy Harris’s ‘Integrational Turn’ in Linguistics.” RASK. International Journal of Language and Coommunication 35(1): 3–42.Google Scholar
Orman, Jon. 2018. “Theorizing the Untheorisable? Notes on Integrationism and the ‘Mixed Game Model’.” Language and Dialogue 8(1): 102–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pablé, Adrian and Christopher Hutton. 2015. Signs, Meaning and Experience: Integrational Approaches to Linguistics and Semiotics. Boston/Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pablé, Adrian. 2017. “Communication Theory and Integrational Semiology: The Constitutive Metamodel Revisited.” Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 8(1): 55–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya. 1994. Les lois du chaos. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale, ed. by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye. Lausanne/Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1962. “The Architecture of Complexity: Hierarchic Systems.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1061: 467–482.Google Scholar
Taylor, Talbot J. 1997. “Roy Harris and the Philosophy of Linguistics.” Language Sciences 19 (1): 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 1996. “Words and their Role in Language Use.” In Language Structures and Language Use, vol. 11, ed. by Edda Weigand and Franz Hundsnurscher, 151–168. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 2009. Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability, ed. by Sebastian Feller. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Paradigm Changes in Linguistics: From Reductionism to Holism.” Language Sciences 33(4): 544–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Dialogue in the Stream of Life.” Language and Dialogue 5(2): 197–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “How to Verify a Theory of Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue 6(3): 349–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Dialogue: The Key to Pragmatics.” In From Pragmatics to Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand and Istvan Kecskes. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda and Istvan Kecskes (eds). 2018. From Pragmatics to Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 2015. The Meaning of Existence. New York/London: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Druzhinin, Andrey S., Tom Scholte & Tatiana A. Fomina
2024. (Im)politeness mismatches in the multi-dialogic pragmatics of telecinematic satire. Language and Dialogue 14:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Pablé, Adrian
2019. Is a general non-ethnocentric theory of human communication possible? An integrationist approach. Lingua 230 ► pp. 102735 ff. DOI logo
Pablé, Adrian
2019. Integrating the (dialogical) sign: or who's an integrationist?. Language Sciences 75 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Linell, Per
2018. Dialogism is an integrationism. Language and Dialogue 8:2 ► pp. 306 ff. DOI logo
Weigand, Edda
2018. Dialogue. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31], ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Beyond Babel [FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures, 18], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.