Dialogical power negotiations in conflict mediation
In this study, mediator – party power dynamics in workplace disputes mediation dialogues are examined. Adopting
Gramsci’s concept of hegemony (e.g.
2005) and Foucault′s notion that power is not fixed
in dialogues, but constantly negotiated by participants (e.g.
Foucault 1980), the
analyses show that the power dynamics shift in the mediation setting when mediators subordinate dominant parties and enforce their
own formalized power as procedural guides to design (
Aakhus 2003,
2007) a favorable context for conflict resolution. When their procedural power is threatened, mediators
may use specific devices in their interventions that correlate with the four devices – interruption, enforcing explicitness, topic
control, and formulation – Fairclough (
1989, 135–137) states can be used by dominant
participants to control weaker parties in dialogues.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Power, institutionalized discourse, and power asymmetries
- 2.1Power
- 2.2Institutionalized discourse and power asymmetries
- 2.3Types of power asymmetries in workplace disputes
- 2.3.1Party versus party negotiation
- 2.3.2Party versus mediator (re)negotiation
- 3.The four devices
- 4.Data: Collection and treatment
- 5.Case context
- 5.1New board and old church
- 5.2New laws and old habits
- 6.Power device analyses
- 6.1Power negotiations
- 6.2Power device combinations
- 7.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (41)
References
Aakhus, Mark. 2003. “Neither naïve nor critical reconstruction: Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation.” Argumentation 17(3): 265–290. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aakhus, Mark. 2007. “Communication as design.” Communication Monographs 74(1): 112–117. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adrian, Lin and Solfrid Mykland. 2014. “Creativity in Court-Connected Mediation: Myth or Reality?” Negotiation Journal 30(4): 421–439. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burr, Anne M. 2002. “Confidentiality in mediation communications: A privilege worth protecting.” Dispute Resolution Journal 57(1): 64–70.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carneiro, Davide, Marco Gomes, Paulo Novais and José Neves. 2011. “Developing dynamic conflict resolution models based on the interpretation of personal conflict styles.” In Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ed. by Helena S. Pinto and Luis Antunes, 44–58. Heidelberg: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davis, Albie M. and Richard A. Salem. 1984. “Dealing with Power Imbalances in the Mediation of Interpersonal Disputes.” Mediation Quarterly 6 (1): 17–26. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deason, Ellen E. 2001. “The Quest for Uniformity in Mediation Confidentiality: Foolish Consistency or Crucial Predictability.” Marquette Law. Review 851: 79–111.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Discourse and Power. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, transl. by Alan Sheridan. London: Penguin Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, ed. by Colin Gordon, transl. by Colin Gordon et al. New York: Pantheon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freedman, Lawrence R. and Michael L. Prigoff. 1986. “Confidentiality in Mediation: The Need for Protection.” Ohio St. Journal on Dispute Resolution 21: 37–46.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garcia, Angela C. 2000. “Negotiating negotiation: The collaborative production of resolution in small claims mediation hearings.” Discourse & Society 11(3): 315–343. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gerami, Arghavan. 2009. “Bridging the theory-and-practice gap: Mediator power in practice.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 26(4): 433–451. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gewurz, Ilan G. 2001. (Re)designing mediation to address the nuances of power imbalance. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 19(2): 135–162. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gramsci, Antonio. 2005. Selections from Prison Writings, ed. and transl. by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey N. Smith. London: Lawrence & Wishart.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John and Paul Drew. 1992. Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hughes, Scott H. 1995. “Elizabeth’s Story: Exploring Power Imbalances in Divorce Mediation.” Geo. J. Legal Ethics 81: 553–596.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, Scott. 2002. “Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree.” Journal of Pragmatics 34(10): 1403–1426. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, Scott and Mark Aakhus. 2002. “What mediators do with words: Implementing three models of rational discussion in dispute mediation”. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 20(2): 177–203. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janier, Mathilde and Chris Reed. 2017. “Towards a theory of close analysis for dispute mediation discourse.” Argumentation 31(1): 45–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kelly, Joan B. 1995. “Power imbalance in divorce and interpersonal mediation: Assessment and intervention.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 13(2): 85–98. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moore, Christopher. 1986. The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Managing Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neumann, Diane. 1992. “How mediation can effectively address the male‐female power imbalance in divorce.” Mediation Quarterly 9(3): 227–239.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perelman, Chaim. 1979. The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and its Applications. Holland: Reidel Publishing Company. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1971. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, transl. by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reboul, Anne. 1992. Rhétorique et stylistique de la fiction. Nancy: Presses universitaires de Nancy.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reboul, Anne and Jacques Moeschler. 1996. “Faut-il continuer à faire de l’analyse de discours?.” Hermès, revue de linguistique, (16): 61–92.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rifkin, Janet, Jonathan Millen and Sara Cobb. 1991. “Toward a new discourse for mediation: A critique of neutrality.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 9(2): 151–164.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silberman, Linda and Andrew Schepard. 1986. “Court-Ordered Mediation in Family Disputes: The New York Proposal.” NYU Rev. L. & Soc. Change 141: 741–756.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2008. Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson and Scott Jacobs. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vasilyeva, Alena L. 2012b. “Topics as indication of being on-task/off-task in dispute mediation.” Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 3(1): 61–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vasilyeva, Alena L. 2017. “Strategic maneuvering in dispute mediation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 53(3): 234–251. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiersma, Nienke. 2011. “Machtsstrijd met de advocaat”. NMI Tijdschrift Conflicthantering 71: 2–5.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiseman, Vivian and Jean Poitras. 2002. “Mediation within a hierarchical structure: How can it be done successfully?” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 20(1): 51–65. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.