Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 9:3 (2019) ► pp.444–470

Language use nowadays in Russian communication

Specifics and trends

| Lomonosov Moscow State University (Russia)
| V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University (Russia)
| Lomonosov Moscow State University (Russia)
| Russian State Social University (Russia)
| Russian State Social University (Russia)
| Russian State Social University (Russia)
This article presents linguistic and communicative transformations in socially significant areas of modern communication in Russia. The authors apply a historical-comparative method as well as diachronic description and interpretation to analyze the processes taking place under the influence of intra- and extra-linguistic factors in various Internet and media genres, such as advertising, business and professional communication. It was found that the fusion of the features of communication and publication, the combination of dialogue and polylogue determine the “clickbait” nature of blogs and make blogging the most influential genre of Internet communication. The growing influence of oral speech and corporate rules in the field of business communication underlies the trend toward agrammatism of phrases. Innovations in the field of advertising manifest themselves on the verbal level of the slogan and its implicit influence on the recipient.
Keywords: communication, language use, linguistic norm, sphere of communication, communicative strategy, genre
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Materials and methods
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Blog as the leading speech genre in the Internet communication
    • 4.2Advertising slogan as a form of manipulative communication
    • 4.3Precedent phenomena in media communication
    • 4.4Language use in business communication
    • 4.5“Doctor-patient” communication: Traditions of language use and modern practice in professional communication
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 29 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00051.klu
References (28)
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1979. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Moscow: Sovetskaya Rossiya.Google Scholar
Formanovskaya, Natalia. 1989. Speaking Etiquette and Communication Culture. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.Google Scholar
Kara-Murza, Sergej. 2005. Manipulation of Consciousness. Moscow: Eksmo.Google Scholar
Karasik, Vladimir. 2014. The Linguistic Manifestation of Personality. Volgograd: Paradigma.Google Scholar
Kasperova, Larisa, Natalia Klushina, Larisa Selezneva, Nadia Smirnova, and Irina Tortunova. 2016. “The impact of the Internet on genre and stylistic features of media texts.” Global Media Journal S31, 7.Google Scholar
Klushina, Natalia. 2018. Media Stylistics. Мoscow: Flinta.Google Scholar
Klyuev, Eugene. 2002. Verbal Communication. Moscow: Ripol Klassik.Google Scholar
Kovaleva, Natalia. 2001. “Speech stereotypes of the epistolary text.” In Text. Structure and Semantics. Reports of the 8th International Conference, 231–240. T.I.M.: SportAcadem Press.Google Scholar
Krasnykh, Victoria. 2003. Embraced by Strangers: A Myth or Reality? Moscow: Gnosis.Google Scholar
Krysin, Leonid. 2017. “On the correlation of the language system, its norms and usage.” Communication Studies 2(12): 20–31.Google Scholar
Kukharenko, Valeria. 1988. Interpretation of the Text. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye.Google Scholar
Lebedev, Artemiy. Livejournal. URL: [URL]
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London /New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lotman, Yuri. 2002. History and Typology of Russian Culture. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo.Google Scholar
Miro, Lena. Livejournal. URL: [URL]
Oxford English Dictionary. URL: [URL]
Pelevin, Viktor. 2015. Generation “P”. Moscow: AST Publishing House.Google Scholar
Petrovskaya, Larisa. 1982. Theoretical and Methodological Problems of Socio-psychological Training. Moscow: Moscow State University.Google Scholar
Radchenko, Irina. 2007. Students’ Dictionary of Advertising Terms and Public Relations. E. Ye. Topilskaya (ed.). Voronezh: Voronezh Branch of Moscow Humanitarian Economic Institute.Google Scholar
Petrov, Sergey. 2018. “Facebook has allocated $10 million to pay to community leaders of successful communities”. Federal News Agency. 10 February. URL: [URL]
del Rio, Belen, Rodolfo Vazquez, and Victor Iglesias. 2001. “The effects of brand associations on consumer response.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 18(5): 410–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selezneva, Larisa. 2016. “Discourse tonality in PR-texts.” In Stylistics Today and Tomorrow. Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific Conference, 514–517.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Bad and good text regarding the orthologic aspect.” In Text of Culture and Culture of the Text. Proceedings of the 4th International Pedagogical Forum, 102–107. Moscow: Russian Society of Teachers of the Russian Language and Literature.Google Scholar
Shiryaev, Eugene. 2000. “Types of norms and the issue of cultural and linguistic evaluations.” In Cultural and Linguistic Situation in Modern Russia, ed. by N. A. Kupina. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House.Google Scholar
Sirotinina, Olga. 2013. Russian Language: The System, Language and Risks They Create. Saratov: Publishing House of the Saratov University.Google Scholar
Sternin, Joseph. 2008. Practical Rhetoric: Textbook for University Students. 5th edition. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1985. “Pragmatics.” The New in Foreign Linguistics. Linguistic Pragmatics 161. Compiled and with an introduction by N. D. Arutyunova and Elena Viktorovna Paducheva (eds.). Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Toshovich, Branko. 2015. Internet Stylistics. Monograph. Мoscow: Flinta.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Klushina, Natalia & Maria Vasilchenko
2022. Current Problems of Studying Academic Communication in Contemporary Russian and English Studies. In Science and Global Challenges of the 21st Century - Science and Technology [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 342], ► pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Mustajoki, Arto & Alla Baikulova
2020. The risks of misunderstandings in family discourse. Language and Dialogue 10:3 ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.