Article published In:
Language and DialogueVol. 10:3 (2020) ► pp.303–319
“You can’t say that”
The effects of group affiliation on moral condemnation in cases of group self-deprecation
Why does our moral intuition tend to differ when a person uses deprecating speech towards her own affiliation group as opposed to an outer affiliation group? This paper offers a descriptive mapping of moral intuitions behind group self-deprecation (GSD) as stemming from two theoretical fields: pragmatics and standing. The first possible explanation to our moral intuition focuses on the moral flaw in the utterance of condemned (i.e., the person using GSD). Here, I argue our moral intuition suggests the group affiliation of the condemned affects the utterance’s pragmatic interpretation, thus affecting its offensiveness. An alternative explanation focuses on the critic. Here, I argue practices of standing lay behind the offhand rejection of critiques from outer-group members, regardless of their validity.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Explaining the first moral intuition: The condemned’s group identity affects the deprecating implicature
- 2.1Black humor: The case of group self-deprecating humor
- 2.2Phrase reclaiming: The Cases of Queer and Slut
- 3.Explaining the second moral intuition: The critic’s group identity denies the critic standing
- 3.1The non-hypocrisy condition: Group paternalism
- 3.2The non-involvement condition: Enjoying the fruits of deprecation
- 3.3The business condition: An outside group member is not affected by the group deprecation
- 3.4Know thy place condition: Group autonomy
- 4.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Allport, Gordon
1954 Nature of Prejudice. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bell, Macalester
2013 “The standing to blame: a critique.” In Blame: Its nature and norms, ed. by Justin D. Coates and Neal Tognazzini. 263–281. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Braxton, Greg
Brommage, Thomas
2015 “Just kidding, folks: an expressivist analysis of offensive humor.” Florida Philosophical Review 661: 71–75.
Brontsema, Robin
2004 “A queer revolution: Reconceptualizing the debate over linguistic reclamation.” Colorado Research in Linguistics 17(1): 9.
Coates, Justin D. and Neal Tognazzini
2018 “Blame.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Retrieved from [URL]
Cohen, Gerald A.
2006 “Casting the first stone: Who can, and who can’t, condemn the terrorists?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 581: 113–136.
DeSpelder, Lynne Ann and Albert Lee Strickland, A.
1996 The Last Dance: Encountering Death and Dying. California City, CA: Mayfield Publishers.
Duff, Robin A.
2010 “Blame, moral stand and the legitimacy of the criminal trial.” Ratio 231: 123–140. 
Dworkin, Gerald
2017 “Paternalism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Retrieved from [URL]
Freud, Sigmund
2003 The Joke and Its Relation to the Unconscious. London: Penguin Classics.
Friedman, Marilyn
2013 “How to blame people responsibly.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 471: 271–284.
Garrick, Jacqueline and Mary Beth Williams
2014 “The humor of trauma survivors: Its application in a therapeutic milieu.” In Trauma Treatment Techniques, ed. by Jacqueline Garrick and Mary Beth Williams. 1911. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
Gilbert, Margaret
2006 “Who’s to blame? Collective moral responsibility and its implications for group members.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30(1): 94–114.
Herbert, Cassie
2015 “Precarious projects: The performative structure of reclamation.” Language Sciences 521:131–138.
Herstein, Ori J.
2017 “Understanding standing: Permission to deflect reasons.” Philosophical Studies 174(12): 3109–3132. Retrieved from
Hill, Annie
2016 “SlutWalk as perifeminist response to rape logic: The politics of reclaiming a name.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 13(1): 23–39.
Hope, Clover
King, Matt
in press). “Skepticism about the standing to blame.” In Oxford Studies in Agency And Responsibility, vol. 61 ed. by David Shoemaker 265 289 Oxford Oxford University Press
Kocieda, Aphrodite
2014 “We’re taking slut back: Analyzing racialized gender politics in Chicago’s 2012 Slutwalk march” (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from [URL]
Levy, Ariel
2006 Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture. NY: Free Press.
Lewin, Kurt
1941 “Self-hatred among Jews.” Contemporary Jewish Record IV1: 219–232.
Mitchell, Carol
1977 “The sexual perspective in the appreciation and interpretation of jokes.” Western Folklore 71 (3/4): 293–309.
Nagel, Thomas
1998 “Concealment and exposure.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 271: 3–30.
Rieger, Alicja
2015 “It was a joke for him and a life for me: A discourse on disability related humor among families of children with disabilities.” Disability Studies Quarterly 41.
Sabini, John and Maury Silver
1982 Moralities of everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scanlon, Thomas M.
2008 Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shiffrin, Seana Valentine
2000 “Paternalism, unconscionability doctrine, and accommodation.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 29(3): 205–250.
Smith, Aangela M.
2007 “On being responsible and holding responsible.” The Journal of Ethics 21: 465–484.
Todd, Patrick
2019 “A unified account of the moral standing to blame.” Noûs 53(2): 347–374.
Vaillant, George
1994 “Ego mechanisms of defense and personality psychopathology.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 103(1): 44–50.
Wallace, R. Jay
2010 “Hypocrisy, moral address, and the equal standing of persons.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 381: 307–341.
Zolten, Jerome
1988 “Joking in the face of tragedy.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 45(4): 345–350.