Cover not available
Article published In:
Towards Culture(s) of Dialogue: Communicating Unity and Diversity through Language and Discourse
Edited by Urszula Okulska, Grzegorz Kowalski and Urszula Topczewska
[Language and Dialogue 12:2] 2022
► pp. 218–244

Proximization and dialogue in Internet news texts and comments

| University of Warsaw
The paper presents the results of an empirical study on proximization approached as a dialogue between journalists and readers of Internet media texts and online comments. In this way the paper shows a practical application of the research programme, whose tenets I presented elsewhere (Kowalski 2018), in relation to Polish and Romanian reciprocal media coverage on the winter 2016/2017 protests in the two countries, and follow-up online comments. The analysis shows that participants used proximization for different communicative purposes (descriptive or evaluative), for which they employed different reportoires of proximization strategies (categorization, domestication, construing hybrid IDC/ODC worlds, historical analogies, and references to cultural stereotypes). As a result, there was no consensus on a shared Discourse Space, and alternative Discourse Spaces were negotiated in the online dialogue.
Keywords: proximization, dialogue, media discourse, online comments, Discourse Space, Romania, Poland
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theory and literature review
    • 2.1Proximization theory
    • 2.2Proximization and dialogicity in news discourse
    • 2.3Discourse strategies of proximization
  • 3.Materials
    • 3.1The corpus
    • 3.2Reciprocal media coverage of Poland and Romania
    • 3.3Summary of 2016/2017 protests in Poland and Romania
  • 4.Analysis: Discourse strategies of proximization in Polish and Romanian Internet media texts and media texts’ comments
    • 4.1Categorization
    • 4.2Domestication
    • 4.3Hybrid IDC/ODC worlds
    • 4.4Historical analogies
    • 4.5Dialogue with stereotypes
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 August 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00123.kow
References (27)
References
Bednarek, Monika and Helen Caple. 2012. News Discourse. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Berrocal, Martina. 2017. “Proximizing the Ukraine Conflict: The Case of the United States and the Czech Republic.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13 (2): 327–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
. 2010a. Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric, 2nd revised edition. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
. 2010b. “Proximizing Objects, Proximizing Values: Towards an Axiological Contribution to the Discourse of Legitimization.” In Perspectives in Politics and Discourse, ed. by Piotr Cap, and Urszula Okulska, 119–142. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “ Axiological Proximization .” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 81–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Proximization. The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014a. “Expanding CDS Methodology by Cognitive-Pragmatic Tools: Proximization Theory and Public Space Discourses.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 189–210. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Applying Cognitive Pragmatics to Critical Discourse Studies: A Proximization Analysis of Three Public Space Discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics 701: 16–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Crossing Symbolic Distances in Political Discourse Space.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 313–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “From ‘Cultural Unbelonging’ to ‘Terrorist Risk’: Communicating Threat in the Polish Anti-Immigration Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 15 (3): 285–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunmire, Patricia. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, Joanna. 2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampl, Marek. 2019. “‘Now Is the Time to Root out Evil’: the Role of Natural World Metaphors in the Construction of the ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ Dichotomy.” Brno Studies in English 45 (1): 57–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika. 2015. “Ideology of ‘Here and Now’.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 347–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kowalski, Grzegorz. 2018. “Proximization as Reception.” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series VII: Social Sciences and Law 11 (60): 125–138.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Malcolm N. and Duncan Hunter. 2019. The Discourse of Security: Language, Illiberalism and Governmentality. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sazonova, Yaroslava. 2020. “Linguistic-Pragmatic Means of Filling-in Ontological Lacunas in Blog Texts of Post-Maidan Ukraine.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 11 (2): 41–65.Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. 2008. The Translator’s Invisibility 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Werth, Paul. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wieczorek, Anna Ewa. 2013. Clusivity: A New Approach to Association and Dissociation in Political Discourse, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Andersson, Marta
2024. The language of threat. Pragmatics and Society DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.