Discussion published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 13:1 (2023) ► pp.325
References (82)
Arnett, Ronald C.
2001 “Dialogic Civility as Pragmatic Ethical Praxis: An Interpersonal Metaphor for the Public Domain.” Communication Theory 11 (3): 315–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 ‘The Dialogic Necessity: Acknowledging and Engaging Monologue.” Ohio Communication Journal 531 (October): 1–10.Google Scholar
2016a “An Immemorial Obligation: Countering the Eclipse of the Other.” Journal of Communication and Religion 39 (2): 7–21.Google Scholar
2016b “Dialogue Theory.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, ed. by Klaus Bruhn Jensen, Eric W. Rothenbuhler, Jefferson D. Pooley, and Robert T. Craig, 1–13. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnett, Ronald C. and Pat Arneson
(eds) 2016Philosophy of Communication Ethics: Alterity and the Other. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ashcraft, Karen Lee, Timothy Kuhn, and François Cooren
2009 “Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication.” The Academy of Management Annals 3 (1): 1–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Marian
2020 “Community Care: The Ethics of Care in a Residential Community.” Ethics and Social Welfare 14 (2): 140–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, Nicolas, Boris H. J. M. Brummans, and Camille Vézy
2020 “Agency without Agents: Individuation, Communication, and the Reordering of Organizational Becomings.” Paper presented at the 70th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Gold Coast, Australia.
Bencherki, Nicolas, François Cooren, Boris H. J. M. Brummans, Chantal Benoit-Barné, and Frédérik Matte
2020 “La culture en tant que cultivation : vers une conception communicationnelle de la culture organisationnelle.” Communiquer. Revue de communication sociale et publique, no. 29 (June): 89–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, Nicolas, and Kasper Trolle Elmholdt
2022 “The Organization’s Synaptic Mode of Existence: How a Hospital Merger Is Many Things at Once.” Organization 29 (4): 521–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, Nicolas, and Andrew Iliadis
2021 “The Constitution of Organization as Informational Individuation.” Communication Theory 31 (3): 442–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, Nicolas, Frédérik Matte, and Émilie Pelletier
2016 “Rebuilding Babel: A Constitutive Approach to Tongues-in-Use.” Journal of Communication 66 (5): 766–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, Nicolas, Viviane Sergi, François Cooren, and Consuelo Vásquez
2021 “How Strategy Comes to Matter: Strategizing as the Communicative Materialization of Matters of Concern.” Strategic Organization 19 (4): 608–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, Nicolas, and James P. Snack
2016 “Contributorship and Partial Inclusion: A Communicative Perspective.” Management Communication Quarterly 30 (3): 279–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benoit-Barné, Chantal, and François Cooren
2009 “The Accomplishment of Authority through Presentification: How Authority Is Distributed among and Negotiated by Organizational Members.” Management Communication Quarterly 23 (1): 5–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bos, René ten
2002 “Machiavelli’s Kitchen.” Organization 9 (1): 51–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brummans, Boris H. J. M.
(ed.) 2018The Agency of Organizing: Perspectives and Case Studies. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buber, Martin
1958I and Thou. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe
2009Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel and John Law
1995 “Agency and the Hybrid Collectif.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 94 (2): 481–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castor, Theresa and François Cooren
2006 “Organizations as Hybrid Forms of Life: The Implications of the Selection of Agency in Problem Formulation.” Management Communication Quarterly 19 (4): 570–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choukah, Sarah and Philippe Theophanidis
2016 “Emergence and Ontogenetics: Towards a Communication without Agent.” Social Science Information 55 (3): 286–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Lars Thøger, Mette Morsing, and Ole Thyssen
2011 “The Polyphony of Coporate Social Responsibility: Deconstructing Accountability and Transparency in the Context of Identity and Hypocrisy.” In Handbook of Communication Ethics, ed. by George Cheney, S. May, and Debashish Munish, 457–474. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cissna, Kenneth N., and Rob Anderson
1998 “Theorizing about Dialogic Moments: The Buber-Rogers Position and Postmodern Themes.” Communication Theory 8 (1): 63–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François
2000The Organizing Property of Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “The Communicative Achievement of Collective Minding: Analysis of Board Meeting Excerpts.” Management Communication Quarterly 17 (4): 517–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “The Selection of Agency as a Rhetorical Device: Opening up the Scene of Dialogue through Ventriloquism.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 23–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Ventriloquism and Incarnation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “In the Name of Law: Ventriloquism and Juridical Matters.” In Latour and the Passage of Law, ed. by Kyle McGee, 235–272. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Ethics for Dummies: Ventriloquism and Responsibility.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 24 (1): 17–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Materializing Communication: Making the Case for a Relational Ontology.” Journal of Communication 68 (2): 278–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “Reconciling Dialogue and Propagation: A Ventriloquial Inquiry.” Language and Dialogue 10 (1): 9–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François, Stephanie Fox, Daniel Robichaud, and Nayla Talih
2005 “Arguments for a Plurified View of the Social World: Spacing and Timing as Hybrid Achievements.” Time & Society 14 (2–3): 265–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François, and Sergeiy Sandler
2014 “Polyphony, Ventriloquism, and Constitution: In Dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory 24 (3): 225–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1994Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
1998Monolingualism of the Other, or, The Prosthesis of Origin. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [URL]
2000Of Hospitality. Ed. by Anne Dufourmantelle. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Follett, Mary Parker
1926 “The Psychological Foundations: The Giving of Orders.” In Scientific Foundations of Business Administration, ed. by Henry C. Metcalf, 132–149. Human Relations. Baltimore, MD: The Williams & Wilkins Company.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1979 “What Is an Author?” In Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, ed. by Josué V. Harari, 225–230. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda
2007Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Marzá, Domingo
2005 “Trust and Dialogue: Theoretical Approaches to Ethics Auditing.” Journal of Business Ethics 57 (3): 209–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony
1984The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Golob, Ursa, and Klement Podnar
2014 “Critical Points of CSR-Related Stakeholder Dialogue in Practice.” Business Ethics: A European Review 23 (3): 248–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gurevitch, Zali
2000 “Plurality in Dialogue: A Comment on Bakhtin”. Sociology 34 (2): 243–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennion, Antoine
2017 “From Valuation to Instauration: On the Double Pluralism of Values.” Valuation Studies 5 (1): 69–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Illia, Laura, Stefania Romenti, Belén Rodríguez-Cánovas, Grazia Murtarelli, and Craig Carroll
2017 “Exploring Corporations’ Dialogue About CSR in the Digital Era.” Journal of Business Ethics 146 (1): 39–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johannesen, Richard L.
1971 “The Emerging Concept of Communication as Dialogue.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 57 (4): 373–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel
(1785) 2002Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Ed. by Thomas E. Hill and Arnulf Zweig. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [URL]
Krippendorff, Klaus
1989 “On the Ethics of Constructing Communication.” In Rethinking Communication: Paradigm Issues, ed. by B. Dervin, Lawrence Grossberg, B. J. O’Keefe, and E. Wartella, 66–96. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [URL]
Latour, Bruno
2011 “La Société Comme Possession – La « preuve Par l’orchestre »’. In Philosophie des Possessions, ed. by Didier Debaise, 9–34. Dijon: Presses du réel.Google Scholar
2013An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Létourneau, Alain
2012 “Towards an Inclusive Notion of Dialogue for Ethical and Moral Purposes.” In (Re)Presentations and Dialogue, ed. by François Cooren and Alain Létourneau, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel
1987Time and the Other. Translated by Richard A. Cohen. Revised edition. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Neil
2014 “Forced to Be Free? Increasing Patient Autonomy by Constraining It.” Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5): 293–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano, Josep M., and Alfons Sauquet
1999 “Integrating Business and Ethical Values Through Practitioner Dialogue.” Journal of Business Ethics 22 (3): 203–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair C.
1981After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Maclagan, Patrick
1999 “Corporate Social Responsibility as a Participative Process’. Business Ethics: A European Review 8 (1): 43–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matte, Frédérik, and Nicolas Bencherki
2019 “Materializing Ethical Matters of Concern: Practicing Ethics in a Refugee Camp.” International Journal of Communication 131: 5870–5889.Google Scholar
Matte, Frédérik, and François Cooren
2015 “Learning as Dialogue: An “on-the-Go” Approach to Dealing with Organizational Tensions.” In Francophone Perspectives of Learning Through Work: Conceptions, Traditions and Practices, ed. by Laurent Filliettaz and Stephen Billett, 169–187. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamee, Sheila, and John Shotter
2004 “Dialogue, Creativity, and Change.” In Dialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, by Rob Anderson, Leslie Baxter, and Kenneth Cissna, 91–104. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meunier, Dominique, and Consuelo Vásquez
2008 “On Shadowing the Hybrid Character of Actions: A Communicational Approach.” Communication Methods and Measures 2 (3): 167–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2018 “The Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet Shops.” Discourse Studies 20 (6): 743–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morrell, Kevin, and Michael Anderson
2006 “Dialogue and Scrutiny in Organizational Ethics.” Business Ethics: A European Review 15 (2): 117–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morsing, Mette, and Majken Schultz
2006 “Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies.” Business Ethics: A European Review 15 (4): 323–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oosterhout, J. (Hans) van, Ben Wempe, and Theo van Willigenburg
2004 “Rethinking Organizational Ethics: A Plea for Pluralism.” Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4): 385–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poulos, Christopher N.
2008 “Accidental Dialogue.” Communication Theory 18 (1): 117–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John
1971A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricœur, Paul
1991From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, II1. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Robert E.
2012 “Strategy and Creativity in Dialogue.” In Spaces of Polyphony, ed. by Clara-Ubaldina Lorda and Patrick Zabalbeascoa, 11–24. Amsterdam; New York, NY: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Souriau, Étienne
(1956) 2015 “Of the Mode of Existence of the Work To-Be-Made.” In The Different Modes of Existence, translated by Erik Beranek and Tim Howles, 219–240. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishers.Google Scholar
(1943) 2015The Different Modes of Existence. Translated by Erik Beranek and Tim Howles. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishers.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty
1988 “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Stam, Henderikus J.
2010 “Self and Dialogue: Introduction.” Theory & Psychology 20 (3): 299–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, John, and Karen Zediker
2000 “Dialogue as Tensional, Ethical Practice.” Southern Communication Journal 65 (2–3): 224–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stückelberger, Christoph
2009 “Dialogue Ethics: Ethical Criteria and Conditions for a Successful Dialogue Between Companies and Societal Actors.” Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3): 329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy
1987Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-Machine Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles
1992The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, Consuelo, and Timothy R. Kuhn
eds. 2019Dis/Organization as Communication: Exploring the Disordering, Disruptive and Chaotic Properties of Communication. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2010Dialogue – The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Létourneau, Alain, Geneviève Boivin & Nicolas Bencherki
2023. Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice. Language and Dialogue 13:2  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.