Article published In:
(Inter)Cultural Dialogues
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu
[Language and Dialogue 13:3] 2023
► pp. 427452
References (38)
Agar, Michael
1994Language Shock: Understanding the Culture of Conversation. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
2002 “Interjections in a Contrastive Perspective”. In Emotion in Dialogic Interaction, ed. by Edda Weigand, 99–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Airenti, Gabriella, Bruno G. Bara, and Marco Colombetti
1993 “Conversation and Behavior Games in the Pragmatics of Dialogue.” Cognitive Science 17(2): 197–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avram, Mioara
1986Gramatica pentru toți. București: Editura Academiei.Google Scholar
Bara, Bruno
2011 “Cognitive Pragmatics: The Mental Processes of Communication.” Intercultural Pragmatics 8(3): 443–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard and Charles F. Hockett
1984Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, Kenneth
1969A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of CA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonagy, Ivan
2001Languages Within Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foss, Sonja
2008Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice, 2nd edition. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
GLR – Guţu-Romalo, Valeria
(ed.) 2005/2008Gramatica limbii române/ Grammar of Romanian. I – II. București: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 31: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane and Weir, Andrew
2015 “The cartography of yes and no in West Flemish.” Discourse-oriented Syntax 2261: 175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2015The Syntax of Yes and No. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2007 “Formulaic Language in English Lingua Franca.” Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Larry Horn, 191–219. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 40(3): 385–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “The Paradox of Communication: A Socio-Cognitive Approach.” Pragmatics and Society 1(1): 50–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Intracultural communication and intercultural communication: Are they different?International Review of Pragmatics 7 (2): 171–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “A Dialogic Approach to Pragamtics”. Russian Journal of Linguistics 20 (4): 26–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “From Pragmatics to Dialogue.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 78–92. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2022The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazziotta, Nicolas and Sylvain Kahane
2016 “Le «mot-phrase» dans les conceptions syntaxiques de Lucien Tesnière.” Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 111(1): 71–107.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1978 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 7–55. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sæbø, Kjell Johan
1988 “A cooperative yes-no query system featuring discourse particles.” Coling Budapest 1988 Volume 2: International Conference on Computational Linguistics 1988 Available at [URL]. DOI logo
Scollon, Ron, Suzane Wong Scollon
2001 “Discourse and Intercultural Communication.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Shiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi E. Hamilton, 537–547. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A.
1962 “The Architecture of Complexity: Hierarchic Systems.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1061: 467–482.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2013 “From TAM to Discourse. The Role of Information Status in North-Western Italian già ‘already’”. In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description, ed. by Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornilie, and Paola Pietrandrea, 163–190. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1900A New English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vasilescu, Andra
2016 “Towards a “Theory of Everything”.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use in Human Communication, ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, 305–334. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 “Subspecificare și polifuncționalitate. Studiu de caz: frumos .” In Actele celei de a 21-a Conferințe a Departamentului de Lingvistică, ed. by Isabela Nedelcu, Irina Paraschiv, and Andra Vasilescu, 553–563. București: Editura Universității din București.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
1986 “ Generated or Degenerate?In Linguistics Across Historical and Geographical Boundaries , ed. by Dieter Kastovsky, A. J. Szwedek, Barbara Płoczińska, and Jacek Fisiak. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2009Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “The Mixed Game Model. A Holistic Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 174–194. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2018 “Dialogue: The Key to Pragmatics.” In From Pragmatics to Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand and Istvan Kecskes, 5–27. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar


Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica, Stoica, Gabriela
2022Româna ca limbă străină. București: Editura Universității din București.Google Scholar