Review published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 5:2 (2015) ► pp.340347
References (15)
References
Bakhtin, Mikahil M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bohm, David. 1996. On Dialogue. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buber, Martin. 1978. Between Man and Man. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fishelov, David. 2010. Dialogues with/and Great Books: The Dynamics of Canon Formation. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Dialogue and Dialogicality: Swift’s A Modest Proposal and Plato’s Crito .” In Literature as Dialogue: Invitations Offered and Negotiated, ed. by Roger D. Sell, 23–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keats, John. 1954. Letters of John Keats. Frederick Page (ed.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kinzel, Till, and Jarmila Mildorf (eds). 2012. Imaginary Dialogues in English: Explorations of a Literary Form. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. 1961. An Experiment in Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muždeka, Nina. 2014. “Multifaceted Postmodernist Dialogue: Julian Barnes’s Talking It Over and Love, etc .” In Literature as Dialogue: Invitations Offered and Negotiated, ed. by Roger D. Sell, 67–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikulin, Dmitri. 2010. Dialectic and Dialogue. Stanford: Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sell, Roger D. 2000. Literature as Communication: The Foundations of Mediating Criticism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Communicational Critcism: Studies in Literature as Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2014. Literature as Dialogue: Invitations Offered and Negotiated. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sell, Roger D., Adam Borch, and Inna Lindgren (eds). 2013. The Ethics of Literary Communication:Genuiness, Directness, Indirectness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Womack, Peter. 2011. Dialogue. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar