Article published In:
Writing in interactionEdited by Lorenza Mondada
[Language and Dialogue 6:1] 2016
► pp. 140–178
Edited by Lorenza Mondada
[Language and Dialogue 6:1] 2016
► pp. 140–178
Going to write
Embodied trajectories of writing of collective proposals in grassroots democracy meetings
This paper offers a multimodal approach of writing as an embodied interactional action, prefigured by the movements of the entire body, projecting going to write. It considers grassroots participatory democracy meetings as an exemplary setting for studying issues related to writing in public, for the public and on behalf of the public. In this context, a facilitator is in charge of writing down the outcome of the participatory discussion, in a way that is public, transparent and intelligible for the audience. On the basis of extensive video recordings, I study the methodic embodied practices that precede and lead to public writing. The analysis shows that the writing of proposals is contingent on the establishment of an agreement about them: clear agreement is followed by a straight and brisk walk of the facilitator towards the board, projecting the inscription. By contrast, when there are problems in establishing the agreement, his walk is more discontinuous. Finally, in case of persisting disagreement, the walk deploys in very different manners. Thus embodied movements of the facilitator are reflexively related to the agreed upon vs. disagreed status of the proposal that the facilitator is going to inscribe. This demonstrates how writing is strongly projected by walking; and how writing is observably done in a public, transparent, and revisable way as the product of a collective action.
Keywords: walking, public writing, embodiment, walking, social interaction, multimodality, writing, collectivity, agreement
References (25)
Asmuss, Birte. 2012. “Implikationen technischer Arbeitsgeräte für die Koordination und Ko-Orientierung in einer Arbeitsbesprechung” [“Consequences of technical devices for the coordination and the co-orientation of professional meetings”]. In Raum als Interaktive Ressource [Space as interactional resource], ed. by H. Hausendorf, L. Mondada, and R. Schmitt, 317–346. Tübingen: Narr.
Asmuß, Birte, and Sae Oshima. 2012. “Negotiation of Entitlement in Proposal Sequences.” Discourse Studies 14 (1): 67–86. 
Broth, Mathias, and Lorenza Mondada. 2013. “Walking Away. The Embodied Achievement of Activity Closings in Mobile Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 471: 41–58.
De Stefani, Elwys, this issue.
Goodwin, Charles 2000. “Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1489–1522.
Greiffenhagen, Christian, and Wes Sharrock. 2005. “Gestures in the Blackboard Work of Mathematics Instruction.”
Proceedings of Interacting Bodies, Online Proceedings of the 2d ISGS Conference
. [URL]
Hazel, Spencer, and Christian Mortensen. 2014. “Embodying the Institution. Object Manipulation in Developing Interaction in Study Counselling Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics 651: 10–29.
Heath, Christian, and Paul Luff. 2000. Technology in Action. Cambridge: CUP.
Heritage, John, and Rodney Watson. 1980. “Aspects of the Properties of Formulations: Some Instances Analyzed.” Semiotica 301: 245–262.
Jefferson, Gail 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols With an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, ed. by G.H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Komter, Marta L. 2006. “From Talk to Text: The Interactional Construction of a Police Record.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 39 (3): 201–228.
Mondada, Lorenza 2011. “The Interactional Production of Multiple Spatialities Within a Participatory Democracy Meeting.” Social Semiotics 21 (2): 283–308.
. 2013. “Embodied and Spatial Resources for Turn-taking in Institutional Multi-party Interactions: The Example of Participatory Democracy Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 461: 39–68.
. 2014. “Bodies in Action: Multimodal Analysis of Walking and Talking.” Language and Dialogue 4 (3) : 357–403.
. 2015. “The Facilitator’s Task of Formulating Citizens’ Proposals in Political Meetings: Orchestrating Multiple Embodied Orientations to Recipients.” Gesprächsforschung 161: 1–62. [URL]
. 2016. “An Interactionist Perspective on the Ecology of Linguistic Practices: The Situated and Embodied Production of Talk.” In Language Ecology and Language Contact, ed. by R. Ludwig, P. Mühlhäusler, and S. Pagel, Cambridge: CUP.
. in press. “Questions on the Move.” In Multiple Temporalities in Interaction, ed. by A. Deppermann, and J. Streeck, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Nissi, Riikka. 2015. “From Entry Proposals to a Joint Statement: Practices of Shared Text Production in Multiparty Meeting Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 791: 1–21.
Pälli, Pekka, and Esa Lehtinen. 2014. “Making Objectives Common in Performance Appraisal Interviews.” Language & Communication 391: 92–108.
Pitsch, Karola. 2007. “Unterrichtskommunikation Revisited: Tafelskizzen als interaktionale Ressource.” [“School communication revisited: Sketches on the blackboard as an interactional resource”] Bulletin VALS-ASLA 851: 59–80.
Schegloff, Emanuel. A. 1998. “Body Torque.” Social Research 65 (3): 535–586.
Stevanovic, Melisa. 2013. “Constructing a Proposal as a Thought: A Way to Manage Problems in the Initiation of Joint Decision-making in Finnish Workplace Interaction.” Pragmatics 23 (3): 519–544.
Svensson, Hanna. 2016. “Surveiller et corriger. L’accomplissement interactionnel de révisions d’inscriptions publiques.” [“To surveil and to correct. The interactional achievement of revisions of public inscriptions”] In Participation et Asymétries dans l’Interaction Institutionnelle [Participation and asymmetries in institutional interactions], ed. by L. Mondada, and S. Keel, Paris: L’Harmattan.
Svinhufvud, Kimmo., this issue.
Svinhufvud, Kimmo., and Sanna Vehviläinen. 2013. “Papers, Documents, and the Opening of an Academic Supervision Encounter.” Text & Talk 331: 139–166.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Tomasine, Joseph S.
2024. Accomplishing feedback through inscription during reading assessment interaction. Linguistics and Education 80 ► pp. 101282 ff. 
Mlynář, Jakub
2023. Lifting the pen and the gaze: embodied recruitment in collaborative writing. Text & Talk 43:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Weiste, Elina, Inka Koskela, Aku Kallio, Hanna Keränen, Sanna Pesonen, Erja Sormunen, Pirjo Juvonen-Posti & Johanna Ruusuvuori
2023. Balancing participation in writing meeting minutes online in video-mediated return-to-work negotiations. Frontiers in Communication 8
Nissi, Riikka & Esa Lehtinen
2022. Digital Documenting Practices: Collaborative Writing in Workplace Training. Written Communication 39:4 ► pp. 564 ff.
Norén, Niklas, Helen Melander Bowden & Ann-Carita Evaldsson
2022. Young students’ treatment of synthetic voicing as an interactional resource in digital writing. Classroom Discourse 13:3 ► pp. 241 ff.
Salomaa, Elina & Esa Lehtinen
2022. Changing the ownership of ideas: Multimedial accomplishment of collaborative reflection in an organizational workshop. Language & Communication 85 ► pp. 14 ff.
Salomaa, Elina & Esa Lehtinen
2023. Public note-taking on a digital platform as a workplace practice. Discourse Studies 25:6 ► pp. 775 ff.
Nielsen, Søren Beck
2021. Interactional integration of talk and note-taking. Psychology of Language and Communication 25:1 ► pp. 145 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
2018. Controversial Issues in Participatory Urban Planning: An Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Historical Study. In Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction, ► pp. 287 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.