Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Ecology
Vol. 1:2 (2017) ► pp.185–212

Language contact in the Philippines

The history and ecology from a Chinese Filipino perspective

| National University of Singapore
This article narrates the sociohistory of the Philippines through the lens of a Sinitic minority group – the Chinese Filipinos. It provides a systematic account of the history, language policies, and educational policies in six major eras, beginning from the precolonial period until the Fifth Republic (960 – present). Concurrently, it presents a diachronic narrative on the different linguistic varieties utilized by the ethnic minority, such as English, Hokkien, Tagalog, and Philippine Hybrid Hokkien (PHH). Following an exposition on how these varieties were introduced to the ecology is a discussion focused on contact that highlights potential theories as to how Philippine contact varieties like PHH emerged. How this account contributes to the overall language ecology forms the conclusion. Overall, this article delineates the socio-historical sources that intrinsically play a significant role in the (re)description of Philippine contact varieties. In its breadth, this article goes beyond providing second-hand information, and presents ideas that can be crucial for understanding how Philippine contact languages work.
Keywords: Chinese Filipino, language contact, language ecology, Philippine contact languages, sociohistory
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Period 1: Pre-colonial Philippines (before 1521)
  • 3.Period 2: Spanish colonization (1521–1898)
  • 4.Period 3: American occupation (1898–1946)
  • 5.Period 4: Post-colonization (1946–1965)
  • 6.Period 5: Martial law era (1965–1986)
  • 7.Period 6: The Fifth Republic onwards (1986 – present)
  • 8.Language contact in focus
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 January 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.1.2.04gon
References (54)
References
Ang See, Teresita. 1990. The Chinese in the Philippines: Problems and Perspectives, Volume 11. Manila: Kaisa Para sa Kaunlaran, Inc.Google Scholar
. 2005. Chinese in the Philippines. In M. Ember, C. Ember and I. Skoggard, eds. Encyclopedia of Diasporas: Immigrant and Refugee Cultures around the World. NY: Springer. 760–769.Google Scholar
Bautista, Maria Lourdes S. 1996. Notes on three sub-varieties of Philippine English. In M. L. S. Bautista, ed. Readings in Philippine Sociolinguistics. Manila: De La Salle University Press.Google Scholar
2000. Attitudes of English language faculty in three leading Philippine universities toward Philippine English. Asian Englishes 4(1): 4–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Tagalog-English code switching as a mode of discourse. Asia Pacific Education Review 5(2): 226–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga. 2009. A survey on language use, attitudes, and identity in relation to Philippine English among young generation Filipinos: An initial sample from a private university. Philippine ESL Journal 31: 74–107.Google Scholar
. 2016. Relocating Philippine English in Schneider’s dynamic model. Asian Englishes 18(3): 232–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CartoGIS, College of Asia and the Pacific, and The Australian National University. 2016. Philippine languages. Retrieved from [URL]
Chan-Yap, Gloria. 1980. Hokkien Chinese Borrowings in Tagalog. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Chu, Richard T. 2010. Chinese and Chinese Mestizos of Manila. Leiden/ Boston, MA: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doeppers, Daniel F. 1986. Destination, selection and turnover among Chinese migrants to Philippine cities in the nineteenth century. Journal of Historical Geography 12(4): 381–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enriquez, Maria Althea T. 2012. Philippine English and Taglish from a Language Contact Perspective. PhD Dissertation. National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Gonzales, Hernando V. and J. R. Cortes. 1988. The Philippines. In G. T. Kurian, ed. World Education Encyclopedia. NY: Facts on File Publications. 992–1004.Google Scholar
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong. 2016. Trilingual code-switching using quantitative lenses: An exploratory study on Hokaglish. Philippine Journal of Linguistics 471: 109–131.Google Scholar
. 2017. Philippine Englishes. Asian Englishes 19(2): 79–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong and Shirley Navarro Dita. 2017. Split infinitives across World Englishes: A corpus-based investigation. Asian Englishes. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, Andrew. 2004. The social dimensions of Philippine English. World Englishes 23(1): 7–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Donn V. 1970. Studies in Philippine Church History [Book review]. The Journal of Asian Studies 29(4): 994–997.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., and S. Gal. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity, ed. Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press. 35–84.Google Scholar
Jensen, Irene Khin Khin Myint. 1975. The Chinese in the Philippines During the American Regime: 1898–1946. San Fransisco: R and E Research Associates.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk and H. G. Widdowson, eds. English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 11–30.Google Scholar
1997. English is an Asian language. In M. L. S. Bautista, ed. English is an Asian Language: The Philippine Context (Proceedings of the Conference held in Manila on August 2–3). North Ryde, NSW: Macquarie Library. 1–23.Google Scholar
Klöter, Henning. 2011. The Language of the Sangleys: A Chinese Vernacular in Missionary Sources of the Seventeenth Century. Leiden/ Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, G. Simons, and C. Fennig. 2016. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, nineteenth edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2007. Mergers and acquisition: On the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes 26(4): 446–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa and Umberto Ansaldo. 2016. Languages in Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipski, John M. 2012. Remixing a mixed language: The emergence of a new pronominal system in Chabacano (Philippine Creole Spanish). International Journal of Bilingualism 17(4): 448–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llamzon, Teodoro A. and John P. Thorpe. 1972. Review of Jose Villa Panganiban’s Talahuluganang Pilipino-Ingles. Philippine Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 130–139.Google Scholar
Majul, Cesar Adib. 1978. Principales, ilustrados, intellectuals and the original concept of a Filipino national community. Second National Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 14–18 May 1978.
Martin, Isabel Pefianco. 2014. English language teaching in the Philippines. World Englishes 33(4): 472–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McBeath, Gerald A. 1973. Political Integration of the Philippine Chinese. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
McFarland, Curtis. 2004. The Philippine language situation. World Englishes 23(1): 59–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pacho, Arturo Guzman. 1981. Policy Agenda of the Ethnic Chinese in the Philippines. PhD Dissertation. Kent State University Graduate College.Google Scholar
Poa, Dory. 2004. 从四语人到双语人：论菲律宾华校的多语教学. [From quadrilingual to bilingual: On the multilingual teaching in the Chinese schools in the Philippines.] 双语学研究 [Bilingual Studies] (2): 96–107.Google Scholar
Rafael, Vicente L. 1995. Taglish, or the phantom power of the lingua franca. Public Culture 81:101–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reid, Lawrence A. 2009. Who are the indigenous? Origins and transformations. The Cordillera Review: Journal of Philippine Culture and Society 1(1): 2–25.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. The dynamics of new Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. 2016. Hybrid Englishes: An exploratory survey. World Englishes 35(3): 339–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
See, Chinben. 1988. Chinese organizations and ethnic identity in the Philippines. In J. Cushman and G. Wang, eds. Changing Identities of the Southeast Asian Chinese Since World War II. Hong Kong, SAR: Hong Kong University Press. 319–334.Google Scholar
Sibayan, Bonifacio P. 2000. Resulting patterns of sociolinguistic, socioeconomic, and cultural practice and behavior after more than four hundred years of language policy and practice in the Philippines. In M. L. S. Bautista, T. A. Llamzon and B. P. Sibayan, eds. Parangal cang Brother Andrew: Festschrift for Andrew Gonzalez on his sixtieth birthday. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines. 247–261.Google Scholar
Sicam, Patricia M. and R. Lucas. 2016. Language attitudes of adolescent Filipino bilingual learners towards English and Filipino. Asian Englishes 18(2): 109–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solheim, Wilhelm. 1964. Pottery and the Malayo-Polynesians. Current Anthropology 5(5): 376–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Susan Villanueva. 1972. The Chinese in the Philippines, 1898–1935: A Study of their National Awakening. Quezon City: R.P. Garcia Publishing Co.Google Scholar
. 1993. The Education of Chinese in the Philippines and Koreans in Japan. Unpublished MA thesis. The University of Hong Kong. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Roger M. 2003. Filipino English and Taglish: Language Switching from Multiple Perspectives. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uytanlet, Juliet Lee. 2014. The Hybrid Tsinoys: Challenges of Hybridity and Homogeneity as Sociocultural Constructs among the Chinese in the Philippines. PhD dissertation. Asbury Theological Seminary.Google Scholar
. 2016. The Hybrid Tsinoys: Challenges of Hybridity and Homogeneity as Sociocultural Constructs among the Chinese in the Philippines. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Villanueva, Rey John Castro. 2016. The Features of Philippine English across Regions. PhD dissertation. De La Salle University, Manila, The Philippines.Google Scholar
Viray, Patricia Lourdes. 2016. China: Ties with Philippines improved since Duterte visit. Philippine Star. 20 December 2016. [URL]. Accessed 27 December 2016.
Weightman, George H. 1985. The Philippine Chinese: From aliens to cultural minority. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 16(2): 161–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickberg, Edgar. 1965. The Chinese in Philippine Life, 1850–1898. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zayas, Cynthia Neri. 2004. Language contact in the Visayas: The case of Ati ethno-pharmacology. In S. Burusphat, ed. Papers from the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. Tempe, AZ. Arizona State University. 487–501.Google Scholar
Zulueta, Johanna O. 2007. “I speak Chinese but…”: Code-switching and identity construction among Chinese-Filipino youth. Caligrama 3(2).Google Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Bolton, Kingsley, Priscilla T. Cruz & Isabel Pefianco Martin
2024. Research bibliography for Philippine English (2008–2023). World Englishes DOI logo
Martinez, Julius C.
2023. Recovering translingualism in precolonial Philippines. International Journal of Multilingualism 20:3 ► pp. 1031 ff. DOI logo
Matienzo, Rhochie Avelino Ebora
2022. Back to indigeneity: The philosophy of Loób and Kapwa as education’s past and future. Educational Philosophy and Theory ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Meakins, Felicity & Jesse Stewart
2022. Mixed Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2021. Interactions of Sinitic Languages in the Philippines: Sinicization, Filipinization, and Sino-Philippine Language Creation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2021. Interactions of Sinitic Languages in the Philippines: Sinicization, Filipinization, and Sino-Philippine Language Creation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2022. Interactions of Sinitic Languages in the Philippines: Sinicization, Filipinization, and Sino-Philippine Language Creation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2023. Variability in clusters and continuums. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 9:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2023. Spread, stability, and sociolinguistic variation in multilingual practices: the case of Lánnang-uè and its derivational morphology. International Journal of Multilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2024. Mixed language in flux? The various impacts of multilingual contact on Lánnang-uè’s wh-question system. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2024. Philippine Englishes in the Sino‐Philippine Lannang context: Towards a concentric‐pluricentric interactional‐interplanar model of English. World Englishes DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2024. Advancing Sino-Philippine linguistics and sociolinguistics using the Lannang Corpus (LanCorp). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong & Mie Hiramoto
2020. Two Englishes diverged in the Philippines?. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 35:1 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Lising, Loy, Pam Peters & Adam Smith
2020. Code-switching in online academic discourse. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 41:2 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Peters, Pam
2020. Cultural Keywords in Philippine English. In Dynamics of Language Changes, ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Wong Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel & Rebecca Lurie Starr
2020. Vowel system or vowel systems?. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 35:2 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Lim, Lisa
2019. The Contribution of Language Contact to the Emergence of World Englishes. In The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes, ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Contact, Emergence, and Language Classification. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.