Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Ecology
Vol. 3:1 (2019) ► pp.89–119

Creole typology is analytic typology

 | University of Hong Kong
 | University of Chicago
 | University of Hong Kong | University of Sydney
This paper reviews a number of specific features typical of analytic languages, in an attempt to investigate whether Creole languages can indeed be grouped, at least structurally, with other languages of the analytic (or isolating) type. Based on Sybesma et al. (forthcoming), a study of the nature of analyticity, we select eight features which constitute rather obvious structural parallels between two unrelated groups, namely Sinitic and Kwa. In terms of Creole languages, these eight features can be also clearly located within the APiCS (Michaelis et al. 2013). Contrary to works like Bakker et al. (2011) which argue for the existence of a “Creole Prototype”, our results show that Creole languages do not cluster with each other against other non-Creole languages. Instead, various Creoles clearly owe their grammatical profile to the languages that dominate the typological environment in which they are formed.
Keywords: analytic language, Creole, linguistic complexity, phylogenetic network, Kwa, Sinitic
Article outline
  • 1.On linguistic complexity
  • 2.Kwa and Sinitic
    • 2.1Tone
    • 2.2Bare Nouns
    • 2.3Determiners and classifiers
    • 2.4Inherent objects
    • 2.5Verb-object compounds
    • 2.6Tense
    • 2.7Serialization
    • 2.8Reduplication
    • 2.9Nominal case marking
  • 3.Creole features
  • 4.Additional features that Creoles and analytic languages share
    • 4.1‘Say’-complementizer
    • 4.2Utterance particles
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.17003.sze
References (65)
References
Aboh, Enoch O. 2010. The morphosyntax of the noun phrase. In Enoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, eds. Topics in Kwa Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer. 11–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Creole distinctiveness: A dead end. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31(2): 400–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. and Michel DeGraff. 2014. Some notes on bare nouns in Haitian creole and in Gungbe: A transatlantic Sprachbund perspective. In Tor A. Åfalí and Brit Mæhlum, eds. The Sociolinguistics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 203–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. A null theory of Creole formation based on Universal Grammar. In Ian Roberts, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 401–458.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. and James Essegbey. 2010. General properties of the clause. In Enoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, eds. Topics in Kwa Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer. 39–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. and Norval Smith. 2012. The morphosyntax of non-iconic reduplications: A case study in Eastern Gbe and the Surinam creoles. In Enoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds. The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 27–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O., Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Hertz. 2012. Reduplication beyond the word level: A cross-linguistic view. In Enoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds. The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. 2008. Aspect and modality in Ewe: A survey. In Felix K. Ameka and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, eds. Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 135–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu. 2008. Imperfective constructions: Progressive and prospective in Ewe and Dangme. In Felix K. Ameka and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, eds. Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 215–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2009. Contact Languages: Ecology and Evolution in Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Contact and Asian varieties of English. In Raymond Hickey, ed. The Handbook of Language Contact. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. 498–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Sri Lanka Malay and its Lankan abstrates. In Claire Lefebvre, ed. Creoles, Their Substrates, and Language Typology. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 367–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall and Ingo Plag. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baptista, Marlyse and Jacqueline Guéron, eds. 2007. Noun Phrases in Creole Languages: A Multi-Faceted Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(2): 173–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blasi, Damián E., Susanne Maria Michaelis and Martin Haspelmath. 2017. Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages. Nature Human Behaviour 11: 723–729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brousseau, Anne-Marie. 1988. Triptyque sur les composés: les noms composés en français, fongbe et haïtien en regard des notions de tête et de percolation. Travaux de recherche sur le créole haïtien 21: 1–109.Google Scholar
Bryant, David and Vincent Moulton. 2004. Neighbor-Net: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21(2): 255–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Hilary. 2008. Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages. Linguistic Typology 12(1): 45–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris. 1994. The factive construction in Kwa. Ms. Cornell University.Google Scholar
. 1997. Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 281: 461–497.Google Scholar
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric. 2013. First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45(2): 274–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dede, Keith. 2007. The deep end of the feature pool: Syntactic hybridization in Chinese dialects. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 35(1): 58–80.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 2007. Kreyòl or Haitian Creole. In John Holm and Peter L. Patrick, eds. Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge. 101–126.Google Scholar
Essegbey, James. 1999. Inherent Complement Verbs Revisited: Towards an Understanding of Argument Structure in Ewe. PhD thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
. 2008. The potential morpheme in Ewe. In Felix K. Ameka and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, eds. Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 195–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fattier, Dominique. 2013. Haitian Creole. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages (Vol. II1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 195–204.Google Scholar
Fon Sing, Guillaume. 2017. Creoles are not typologically distinct from non-Creoles. Language Ecology 1(1): 44–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, David. 2009. How Much grammar does it take to sail a boat? In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil and Peter Trudgill, eds. Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 19–33.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glaude, Herby and Anne Zribi-Hertz. 2012. Verb focus in Haitian: From lexical reiteration to Predicate Cleft. In Enoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds. The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 77–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holm, John. 2007. Creole typology and substrate typology. Presentation at the Symposium on Language Contact and the Dynamics of Language: Theory and Implications: Max Planck Institute, Germany, May 10–13.
Holm, John and Peter L. Patrick, eds. 2007. Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li and Yafei Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huson, Daniel H. and David Bryant. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(2): 254–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Martha. 2010. The Empty Subject construction: Verb serialization in Baule. In Enoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, eds. Topics in Kwa Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer. 195–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. 1998. Creole Genesis and the Acquisition of Grammar: The Case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. On the relevance of Pidgins and Creoles in the debate on the origins of language. Presentation at the Summer Institute on The Origins of Language: Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada, June 21–30.
Lefebvre, Claire and Anne-Marie Brousseau. 2002. A Grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2007. Mergers and acquisitions: On the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes 27(4): 446–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa and Umberto Ansaldo. 2006. Keeping Kirinda vital: The endangerment-empowerment dilemma in the documentation of Sri Lanka Malay. In Enoch O. Aboh and Miriam van Staden, eds. ACLC (Amsterdam Centre for Language & Communication) Working Papers 11: 51–66.Google Scholar
Lord, Carol. 1974. Causative constructions in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics, Supplement 51: 195–204.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang-kwong. 1990. Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manfredi, Victor. 1991. Agbo and Ehugbo: Igbo Linguistic Consciousness, its Origins and Limits. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2010. Romani in Britain: The Afterlife of a Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Philippe and the APiCS Consortium. 2013a. Tense-aspect systems. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 192–195.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Tone. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 480–483.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2011. Linguistic Simplicity and Complexity: Why do Languages Undress? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne Maria, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. 2013. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael. 2008. The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki and Fred Karlsson, eds. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 265–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfänder, Stefan. 2013. Guyanais. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages (Vol. II1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 220–228.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sarah Julianne. 1998. The role of diffusion in the genesis of Hawaiian creole. Language 74(1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwegler, Armin. 1990. Analyticity and Syntheticity: A Diachronic Perspective with Special Reference to Romance Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Palenquero. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages (Vol. II1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 182–192.Google Scholar
Stewart, Osamuyimen. 2001. The Serial Verb Construction Parameter. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Su, Lily I-wen. 2004. Subjectification and the use of the complementizer SHUO. Studies in Linguistics 30(1): 19–40.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint, Enoch O. Aboh, Umberto Ansaldo and Lisa L. S. Cheng (forthcoming). Analyticity: A Comparison of Sinitic and Kwa. Unpublished draft.
Szeto, Pui Yiu, Umberto Ansaldo and Stephen Matthews. 2018. Typological variation across Mandarin dialects: An areal perspective with a quantitative approach. Linguistic Typology 22(2): 233–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Jian. 2015. Bare classifier phrases in Sinitic languages: A typological perspective. In Hilary M. Chappell, ed. Diversity in Sinitic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 110–133.Google Scholar
Xu, Dan. 2014. 甘青一帶的賓格標記及其類型學上的意義 Gānqīng yīdài de bīngé biājì jí qí lèixíngxué shàng de yìyì [Accusative case marking in the Gansu-Qinghai region and its significance on typological studies]. In Che Wah Ho and Shengli Feng, eds. 承繼與拓新：漢語語言文字學研究 Chéngjì yǔ tuòxīn: Hànyǔ yǔyán wénzìxué yánjiū [Inheritance and Innovations: Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Philology]. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press. 494–514.Google Scholar
Yakpo, Kofi. 2012. Reiteration in Pichi: Forms, functions and areal-typological perspectives. In Enoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds. The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 251–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Pichi. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 194–205.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Szeto, Pui Yiu & Chingduang Yurayong
2021. Sinitic as a typological sandwich: revisiting the notions of Altaicization and Taicization. Linguistic Typology 25:3 ► pp. 551 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.