On feature interpretability and inheritance
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the theoretical motivations given for feature inheritance, and the workings and distribution thereof. The standard motivations for feature inheritance in the literature are shown not to be tenable. The rationale for feature inheritance given in the literature is based on the requirement that Value and Transfer happen at the same time. This requirement falls through, however; hence, feature ineritance cannot be derived on that basis. Feature inheritance can instead be enforced as the only way to meet a constraint to the effect that the EPP property of a phase head must be satisfied within the minimal structure created by Merge of the phase head with its complement. Syntax then requires feature inheritance as long as ‘EPP’ is necessary and is defined as a Spec–Head relation. Both of these premises are subjected to close scrutiny in the paper, as is the question of whether the predicates ‘(un)interpretable’ and ‘(un)valued’ both need to be recognised by syntactic theory.
References (42)
References
Aoun, Joseph, Benmamoun, Elabbas and Sportiche, Dominique. 1994. “Agreement, word order, and conjunction in some varieties of Arabic.” Linguistic Inquiry 25: 195–220.
Alexiadou, Artemis and Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1998. “Parametrizing Agr: Word order, verb-movement and EPP-checking”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539.
Baltin, Mark. 1995. “Floating quantifiers, PRO, and predication”. Linguistic Inquiry 26:199–248.
Barbosa, Pilar. 1995. “Null Subjects.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Belletti, Adriana. 1999. “Inversion as focalization and related questions”. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 9–45.
Biberauer, Theresa and Roberts, Ian. 2010. “Subjects, tense and verb-movement”. In Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts and Michelle Sheehan (eds), 263–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bošković, Željko. 2011. “On valued uninterpretable features”. Proceedings of NELS 39.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by phase”. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2007. “Approaching UG from below”. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language?, Uli Sauerland and Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 1–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. “On phases”. In Robert Freidn, Carlos Otero and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: 133–166.
Dikken, Marcel. 1995. Particles. On the Syntax of Verb-particle, Triadic and Causative Constructions. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dikken, Marcel den. 2007. “Phase extension. Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction”. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 1–41.
Dikken, Marcel den. 2013. “Prepare and repair: On pre-emptive strikes and post-hoc patches”. In Repairs, Patrick Brandt and Eric Fuß (eds), 131–153. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haider, Hubert. 2000. “OV is more basic than VO”. In The Derivation of OV and VO, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 45–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, S. Jay. 1993. “On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations”. In The View from Building 20, Kenneth Hale and S. Jay Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hornstein, Norbert and Uriagereka, Juan. 2002. “Reprojections”. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Samuel Epstein and T. Daniel Seely (eds), 106–132. Oxford: Blackwell.
Horvath, Julia. 1986. Focus in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Larson, Richard. 1988. “On the double object construction”. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
Lasnik, Howard and Saito, Mamoru. 1991. “On the subject of infinitives”. In CLS Proceedings 27, Part I. 324–343.
López, Luis. 2007. Locality and the Architecture of Syntactic Dependencies. London: Palgrave.
López, Luis. 2009. A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matthewson, Lisa. 1998. Determiner Systems and Quantificational Strategies. Evidence from Salish. The Hague: Holland Academic Press.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2005. “Unifying agreement and agreement-less languages”. Proceedings of WAFL2. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Pesetsky, David and Torrego, Esther. 2001. “T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences”. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 355–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rackowski, Andrea and Richards, Norvin. 2005. “Phase edge and extraction: a Tagalog case study”. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 565–599.
Reid, Wallis. 1991. Verb and Noun Number in English. London: Longman.
Reid, Wallis. 2011. “The communicative function of English verb number”. NLLT 29: 1187–1146.
Richards, Norvin. 1998. “The Principle of Minimal Compliance”. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 599–629.
Richards, Marc. 2007. “On feature inheritance: An argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition”. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 563–572.
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sheehan, Michelle. 2006. “The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance.” Ph.D. dissertation, Newcastle University.
Shim, Ji Young. 2012. “Deriving Word Order in Code-switching: Feature Inheritance and Light Verbs.” Ph.D. dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center.
Surányi, Balázs. 2008. “Cyclic spell out and reprojection in head movement”. In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedűs and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 293–337. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Tzanidaki, Dimitra Irini. 1996. “Configurationality and Greek clause structure.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8.
Wiltschko, Martina. 2003. “On the interpretability of tense on D and its consequences for case theory.” Lingua 113: 659–696.
Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.