Part of
The Form of Structure, the Structure of Form: Essays in honor of Jean Lowenstamm
Edited by Sabrina Bendjaballah, Noam Faust, Mohamed Lahrouchi and Nicola Lampitelli
[Language Faculty and Beyond 12] 2014
► pp. 123138
Anderson, John M., and Colin Ewen
1987Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M., and Charles Jones
1974“Three Theses Concerning Phonological Representations.” Journal of Linguistics 10: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977Phonological Structure and the History of English. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco
1981Strutture prosodiche della lingua italiana. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão de
2008“From Positions to Transitions: A Contour-based Account of Lenition and Fortition.” In Lenition and Fortition, ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer, and Philippe Ségéral, 415–445. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischhacker, Heidi
2001“Cluster-dependent Vowel Insertion Asymmetries.” UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers in Phonology 5: 71–116.Google Scholar
Guerssel, Mohand, and Jean Lowenstamm
1990“The Derivational Morphology of the Classical Arabic Verbal System.” Ms., Université du Québec à Montréal, Université Paris 7.
Kahn, Daniel
1976Syllable-based Generalizations in English Phonology. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung
2003“Perceptual Similarity in Loanword Adaptation: English Post-vocalic Word-final Stops in Korean.” Phonology 20: 219–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Malika Echchadli, and Souad El Ayachi
1986“Les formes verbales de l'arabe marocain.” Revue québécoise de linguistique 16: 61–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, and Jean Lowenstamm
1984“De la syllabicité”. In Forme sonore du langage, ed. by Francois Dell, Daniel Hirst, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 123–159. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael
1994Phonology in Generative Grammar. Oxford & Cambridge (Mass.): Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
1975A Course in Phonetics, 1st edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Levin, Juliette
1983 “Dependent Levels of Representation: The Skeletal Tier and Syllabic Projections.” Communication at the GLOW Meeting , York.
Lowenstamm, Jean
1996“CV as the Only Syllable Type.” In Current Trends in Phonology: Models and Methods, ed. by Jacques Durand, and Bernard Laks, vol. 2, 419–441. CNRS, Paris X: ESRI.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon, and Emmanuel Dupoux
2003 “Reinterpreting Loanword Adaptations: The Role of Perception.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. by Maria-Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens and Joaquín Romero. 367–370. Adelaide: Causal Productions.Google Scholar
Rowicka, Grażyna Jadwiga
1999On Ghost Vowels: A Strict CV Approach. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1982 [1916] Cours de linguistique générale, éd. critique par Tullio de Mauro. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias
1998“A Unified Model of Proper Government.” The Linguistic Review 15: 41–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004A Lateral Theory of Phonology: What is CVCV, and Why Should It Be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheer, Tobias, and Markéta Ziková
2010 “The Coda Mirror v2.” Ms., Université de Nice, Masarykova Univerzita v Brnĕ.
Taki, Mohammed
1990Syllabation, association et variation: approche phonologique tridimensionnelle de l'arabe. Doctoral diss., Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Vago, Robert
1985“The Treatment of Long Vowels in Word Games.” Phonology Yearbook 2: 329–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger
1982Communication at the GLOW Meeting , Paris.
Whalen, Douglas H
1990 “Coarticulation is Largely Planned.” Haskins Laboratory Status Report on Speech Research 101/102: 149–176.Google Scholar