Part of
The Form of Structure, the Structure of Form: Essays in honor of Jean LowenstammEdited by Sabrina Bendjaballah, Noam Faust, Mohamed Lahrouchi and Nicola Lampitelli
[Language Faculty and Beyond 12] 2014
► pp. 287–302
Edited by Sabrina Bendjaballah, Noam Faust, Mohamed Lahrouchi and Nicola Lampitelli
[Language Faculty and Beyond 12] 2014
► pp. 287–302
Sepp vs Paradigms
We present data from a Middle Bavarian language in order to argue against the notions lexeme and paradigm. We argue that there is no level of abstraction at which lexemes have coherent properties, unless that level is the one of morphemes, i.e., of roots and affixes. Our argument is based on an examination of the “paradigm” of clitic determiners: /s/, /d/, /n/ and /da/. We show that each of them has its own phonological, morpho-syntactic and semantic properties. While such data are well compatible with a morpheme-based theory (the finer properties are captured in terms of the properties of individual lexical items, the general properties in terms of natural classes), they illustrate the arbitrariness and incoherence of the notions paradigm and lexeme.
References
Bendjaballah, Sabrina
2012 La grammaire des gabarits. Habilitation thesis, University of Paris 7.
Bendjaballah, Sabrina, and Martin Haiden
2008 “A Typology of Emptiness in Templates.” In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, ed. by Jutta Hartmann, Vera Hegedus, and Henk C. van Riemsdijk, 21–57. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Brugger, Gerhard, and Martin Prinzhorn
1996 “Some Properties of German Determiners.” Ms.
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michal Starke
1999 “The Typology of Structural Deficiency. On the Three Grammatical Classes.” In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Henk van Riemsdijk, 145–234. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
1998 “Paradigmatic Structure: Inflectional Paradigms and Morphological Classes.” In The Handbook of Morphology, ed. by Andrew Spencer, and Arnold M. Zwicky, 322–334. Oxford, England; Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
Dowty, David
1991 “Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection.” Language 67: 547–619. 
Faust, Noam
2013 “Decomposing the Feminine Suffixes of Modern Hebrew.” Morphology 23: 409–440.
Kloeke, W.U.S. van Lessen
1985 Enklitische Formen und Flexion im Bairischen und im Hochdeutschen, In Grammatik, Semantik, Textlinguistik, ed. by W. Kürschner and R. Vogt, 73–80. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
Lowenstamm, Jean
2008 “On Little n, Root, and Types of Nouns.” In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, ed. by Jutta Hartmann, Vera Hegedus, and Henk C. van Riemsdijk, 105–143. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2011 “The Phonological Pattern of phi-features in the Perfective Paradigm of Moroccan Arabic.” Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 3: 140–201.
2012 “Feminine and Gender, or Why the Feminine Profile of French Nouns has Nothing to Do with Gender.” In Linguistic Inspirations. Edmund Gussmann in Memoriam, ed. by Eugenius Cyran, Henryk Kardela, and Bogdan Szymanek, 371–406. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski.
to appear. “Derivational Affixes as Roots, no Exponence (Phasal Spellout meets English Stress Shift).” In The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer, and Florian Schäfer Oxford Oxford University Press
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta
1992 “The Definite Determiner and the Inalienable Constructions in French and in English.” Linguistic Inquiry 23: 595–652.
Weiß, Helmut
1998 Syntax des Bairischen: Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Linguistische Arbeiten. Tübingen: Niemeyer.